(If you can read while listening to music, you should play this song we selected for this post! Just hit the play button!!!)
Please read this brief, but important notice before continuing; This post is an example of just how much information exists on the subject of biblical satanism. (not modern satanism, it’s NOT the same!) It’s information from a few other prominent writers who helped us (Peggy and David) begin our journey of truth. Without them we would never have been able to even begin to grasp the bigger pictures we are fortunate enough to now reveal in our furthered works which you have before you now. Please note how there are no ads and everything is free. If you think our work is worth it and are able, please contribute generously at Unidigi because it is YOUR REPUBLIC, LIFE, HAPPINESS & FREEDOM we’re trying to protect!
Think of Goyim Gazettes as “Your Real History Class, Room 101”. It is required study before advancing and graduating in the school of life and finally understanding the real ins and outs of the world we’re living in. We’re here to reveal that world to you in the quickest, easiest manner possible while delivering the message in it’s fullest, most succinct form.
The idea was to discover and then encapsulate the most important and necessary bits of information available to help others awaken in the shortest amount of time possible. It took us about 600 documentaries and 1,800 books over the course of 3 years to get to where you’ll be able to land in a much shorter period. If successful, that’s an achievement you and we can be proud of! Taking over the world has been no small feat for the owners of the Worlds’ Banking Cartel. It is intentionally rife with deceptions and counter intelligence operations to such a degree that the average person would never figure out. But you will now!
Firstly, There is ZERO room for Doubt as to whether or not the Jewish “conspiracy” for World Domination is Real. NONE. NOTTA. ZIP. It is as Real As Apple Pie! And for the record, there are Very Few “theories” around here. Facts are Facts Regardless Of Whether YOU know them YET.
Secondly, It Would Take The Average Reasonably Intelligent Person At Least 1 to 5 Years to Search for Truthful Information and Disseminate it From the Miles of Disinformation Pertaining to How Satanists Run the World. We Have Condensed It Into 9, Easy to Read, 2 Page Newsletters And That Is The Value of The Goyim Gazette! If you Haven’t read all the GG Issues and watched our videos, do that first. This post is just an example of how massive the conspiracy is.
Here is the entrance to a very deep rabbit hole that you could spend many, many years, even decades or centuries exploring which is why we’ve encapsulated the most important parts into the Gazette and about a dozen easy to read blogs. Use this page and the links below to get an idea of how mind bogglingly huge this learning process can be. Indeed, “The individual is handicapped by a conspiracy so monstrous they cannot believe it exists”, Edgar J. Hoover.
The Legal and Legislative Profession is controlled
Jewish ADL now controls YouTube
Another False Flag by ISRAELI-
Bilderberg: 70% are Jews
Jews Torturing, Killing and
Nearly 300 U.S. Congressman
Jewish Glenn Greenwald Destroys
A Jew Exposes the Fact of
Below we have 21, mostly short blogs from Aussie Bernard Weckmann which is a good introduction to the satanic problem Gentiles are now confronted with. Australians tend to be much more “jew aware” due to several reasons which include the fact that its indigenous peoples, the Aborigines were horrifically slaughtered much like those of the Americas were by European royals who were satanic jews then too.
This was back in the 18th century when they used Australia for “Penal Colonies” the worlds’ largest internment camp for dissident European gentiles. Since then, Australia has always been “Crown Land” with no real armies nor resistance to the jewish banking and Vatican Royals other than that of it’s “colonists” who like many other non-satanic Real Jews and Gentiles are plenty fed up, and knowledgeable;
There is a movement afoot in the Jewish world aimed at uniting mankind under the aegis of the Noahide Laws, a movement that has even been officially sanctioned by the government of the United States. The motto: One People – One World – One God
All of humanity living in peace and harmony on the one and only world we have? Count me in! But here’s the snag! One God? Whose God?
The Institute of Noahide Code is a UN-accredited NGO dedicated to spreading awareness of the Seven Noahide Laws, which all peoples of the world are obligated to follow.
It takes its guidance from the inspiring vision of the Lubavitcher Rebbe, who understood the inherent power of these laws to unite the nations of the world.
Correction! This does not come from the Lubavitcher Rebbe but straight from the world’s most rabidly genocidal and racist book – the Talmud and it goes back a long way. If this piece of lunacy, euphemistically called an “inspiring vision”, were ever fully implemented we would end up with a two-tiered world religion. The traditional “Jew-Only Judaism” at the top and the “Noahide pseudo-Judaism” for the Gentile masses at the bottom. But whether Jew or Gentile – all of humanity would be under the jurisdiction of Talmudic Law as created and interpreted by the rabbis. Anybody who does not want to be a Noahide will be considered an idolater who has, under Talmudic law, no right to live! Off with his head!
Nobody can be entrusted with the responsibility and power of having jurisdiction over all of mankind! Are the rabbis even mentally competent and morally fit to inspire, guide humanity and administer justice? Based on my study of the Jews’ role in history, based on my first-hand knowledge of the Jewish religion, its laws and practices and based, above all, on personal experience with the Jewish people, including rabbis, both in Israel and outside, my answer is a resounding NO!
Why would it even be necessary to introduce these laws? Every religion I know of, every culture I have ever heard of, every country in the world, already has moral laws! Who decides that we are all obligated to obey this particular set of laws? And anyway, there is no legal system anywhere in the world which comes even close to the Anglo-Saxon system in its respect for justice, least of all that of the Talmud. And here is why:
Anglo-Saxon jurisprudence is without the slightest doubt the most advanced system in the world. It rests on the twin pillars of
Innocent until Proven Guilty
You Have The Right Of A Trial By A Jury Of Your Peers.
Under Talmudic law there is NO trial by a jury of peers! Period!
And furthermore, you are presumed guilty until proven innocent. In fact, you can be judged and convicted on the strength of nothing more than a mere presumption.
Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Kiddushin 80a, Soncino 1961: R. Hiyya b. Abba said in R. Johanan’s name: We flagellate on the strength of presumption, we stone and burn on the strength of presumption …
You also need to know that a non-Jew is ALWAYS punished much more harshly than a Jew for the exact same offence.
But you don’t have to wait for a court to sentence you to death. As a Gentile you are fair game to any Jew!
Listen to Rabbi Yitzhak Shapiro, head of the Od Yosef Chai Yeshiva in the Yitzhar settlement:
“If we kill a Gentile who has sinned or has violated one of the seven commandments – because we care about the commandments – there is nothing wrong with the murder.”
If you, dear Gentile reader, wonder exactly what your place would be in Talmudic law Sanhedrin 2a removes any doubt:
Under Talmudic law Jews on the one hand and non-Jews on the other are judged by totally different standards. In capital cases, for instance, 23 judges must sit in judgment on a Jew and there must be two witnesses. A capital case against an ox, a hyena, or a serpent (yes, you read that right!) is also tried by 23 judges.
A capital case against a Gentile, however, is heard by one judge and he is convicted on the testimony of just one witness. You aren’t considered worth more than one judge and one witness! You even rank below animals! How does that make you feel?
That’s Jewish justice for you! Thanks but no thanks!
The average Jew will go to a synagogue perhaps once a week or even less frequently, say for a special occasion such as a wedding or funeral or a religious holiday. He will engage in rituals the origin and meaning of which he more often than not does not fully understand. In fact, he probably does not even know Hebrew or Aramaic well enough to have more than the vaguest notion of what his prayers actually mean. Of the Talmud he knows as little as his Christian neighbour, i.e. virtually nothing.
Considering the inordinately strong influence of Jews and Jewish “values” on almost every aspect of Western civilization and thus the whole world, and furthermore in view of what is planned for the future, does it not behove us, Jew and Gentile alike, to acquaint ourselves with the Talmud and its tenets? Where does it come from? What exactly does it teach? Let’s have a look!
There are actually two versions of the Talmud: the “Talmud Yerushalmi” (Jerusalem Talmud) and the “Talmud Bavli“, (Babylonian Talmud). They differ in many respects. In any conflict between the two it is the authority of the Babylonian Talmud, however, that decides the issue.
A rabbi will tell you that the Talmud is based on the Oral Law given to Moses at Mt Sinai. It isn’t. It is no more than a compilation of ideas, laws, rituals and practices drawn from a wide variety of sources; from pagan and Atenist Egypt, from the legends and polytheistic mystery cults of Sumer and Canaan and above all from Zoroastrian Persia, which dominated Babylon politically and culturally in those long-gone days when Pharisaic Judaism and the Talmud were in the making. It is in its entirety a product manufactured in Babylon.
This huge collection of teachings was compiled and written before the 8th Century A.D. by ancient Jewish teachers, known as the Pharisees. The word “pharisee” comes from the word “Farsi”, which means “Persian”. Even today the language spoken in Iran and some adjoining areas is Farsi and the remaining practitioners of the ancient religion of the Persian prophet Zoroaster call themselves Farsi!
The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia acknowledges the link to the pharisees, the Persians:
The Jewish religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees.
The Talmud is the undisputed foundation on which the Jewish religion and the Jewish way of life, as we know them today, rest.
In many ways the Talmud is the most important book in Jewish culture, the backbone of creativity and of national life. No other work has had a comparable influence on the theory and practice of Jewish life, shaping spiritual content and serving as a guide to conduct.
Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz
The Talmud is to this day the circulating heart’s blood of the Jewish religion. Whatever laws, customs or ceremonies we observe — whether we are Orthodox, Conservative, Reform or merely spasmodic sentimentalists — we follow the Talmud. It is our common law.
Herman Wouk, American Jewish author
The world, in the Pharisee’s view, was created for one purpose only: the glorification of God by the People of Israel (the rest of mankind is nothing more than a stage prop!). It is the Pharisees and their modern descendants, the rabbis, who claim to have inherited the Oral Law and arrogantly presume to have a mandate from on high not only to interpret the laws of the Torah and the Oral Law but to actually amend them in any way they desire or to abrogate them altogether.
Jews take great pride in presenting themselves as the people that gave the world “ethical monotheism” and as being in possession of the most moral religion, Judaism. Everything about this grandiose self-assessment is wrong:
a) Monotheism is a UNIVERSAL phenomenon and precedes Judaism
b) Judaism is NOT A RELIGION but a legal code packaged and marketed as a religion
c) Judaism is utterly DEVOID OF MORALITY – there is only blind obedience to the Law
Some thirty years ago I converted to Orthodox Judaism. Being young, idealistic, naive – and brainwashed as a consequence of my upbringing in Zionist-occupied Germany – I did not really know what I let myself in for. After moving to Israel I studied for a while in a yeshiva (a religious academy in which the Talmud, and only the Talmud, is studied).
Talmudic scholars are masters of biblical exegesis, the brilliant science and exquisite art of making any text say anything they want it to say including the exact opposite of its clear and unambiguous meaning! And they are swaggeringly proud of it. Read this piece of self-aggrandizement:
“Through his keen intellect, his vast learning and his energetic activity he wielded a great influence in developing and diffusing the traditional law. He arranged the accumulated material of that law in a proper system and methodical order, and enriched its substance with many valuable deductions of his own … Besides, he introduced a new method of interpreting the Scriptures, which enabled him to find a biblical basis for almost every provision of the oral law. This ingenious method was admired by his contemporaries, and notwithstanding the opposition of some of his colleagues, generally adopted in addition to the hermeneutic rules of R. Ishmael.”
But don’t you dare disagree with them! Whosoever disobeys the rabbis deserves death and will be punished by being boiled in hot excrement in hell. (Erubin 21b)
Really? Well, with Talmudic Jews in charge of the world who needs hell?
The plainly obvious intellectual dishonesty and insanity of their pilpul (casuistry) is repugnant enough but there is also the fact that Talmudic studies are not at all, as Jews would have you believe, challenging and stimulating, quite the contrary – they are stifling, mind-numbing and stupefying in their total focus on the minutiae of trivial, irrelevant, asinine and obscene matters.
When I could no longer take the idiocies, obscenities and reptilian coldness of the Talmud and its adherents I removed myself from everything Jewish to preserve my sanity and after four years I left the country for good.
If asked to define a Talmudic Jew in one word I would say: GOLEM, writ large! It is, in my view, the most fitting description. Both the golem of Jewish legend and the Talmudist only give the appearance of being alive. Just as the golem – a creature made of clay – is magically animated by a sacred word from Jewish scriptures, written on parchment and inserted into the mouth or affixed to the head, so the Talmudist is animated by the “magic” words of the Talmud which he studies and crams into his head, to the exclusion of everything else.
The Talmudist, no matter how vast his knowledge, is capable only of dealing with the surface meaning of anything, i.e. the mere dead letter of the law, not the spirit that animates it.
The Talmudist’s knowledge of and interest in anything which is not directly connected to his particular way of life is quite literally zero. There is no curiosity about the natural world, for example, let alone appreciation of it. Yes, they will say a blessing (in fact, there are many of them!) when they come across certain natural phenomena but only because they are commanded by the Talmud. Such blessings come from the brain, never from the heart. It is all purely mechanical. Not once did I have the impression that they were genuinely touched by, say the beautiful smile of an innocent child or the sight of a breath-taking sunrise, by the sensuous movement and sleekness of a cat, the song of a bird or … Enough said … you get the idea! They are dead on the inside!
There is no interest in and appreciation of art, be it literature or music or painting or sculpture. Dante, Shakespeare, Goethe, Tolstoy? Rubens, Botticelli, Michelangelo, Da Vinci? Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Wagner? “Never heard of them! Are they Jewish? No? Then go away and do not waste my time!” In order to appreciate art you need creative imagination, the ability to take flight in your mind and to transport yourself somewhere else – and that is something a Talmudist is incapable of!
There is no interest in opening and broadening the mind by studying, for example, history or other people’s languages, religions, philosophies and ways of life. “They aren’t Jewish so what would they really know? What could they possibly teach us?”
To a Talmudist there is also no point in pondering such questions as: “Where do we come from? Why are we here? How do I live a meaningful and moral life?” He is exactly the same as any zombified New Age follower of this, that or the other guru. His beloved guru-rebbe will relieve him of the hard work of thinking and making moral decisions.
Which leaves him free to attend to life’s more important things. He is concerned with making sure not to sit next to a woman; she might be menstruating and thus be ritually unclean. Better not to sit next to a woman at all. He worries about the distant possibility that his food, God forbid, has, at some stage, been handled by a goy and might therefore be trefah (i.e. not kosher). He has great difficulty falling asleep at night because he is assailed by nagging doubts whether he did put on his clothes in the morning in the right order as Talmudically ordained; he was in such a rush, you see, and can’t quite remember. What a calamity!
A Talmudic Jew thanks God every day that He did not make him a Gentile. I do not suffer from claustrophobia nor do I have the fear of being buried alive. But when I remember my years living in Israel as a Jew I have a glimpse of what the sufferers of these fears must experience. Why would anybody even want such a life? Can you imagine what it is like in the self-imposed narrow world of a Talmudist? Perhaps Gentiles should feel sorry for the Jews and thank God that He did not make them Jewish?
Curiosity killed the cat. Perhaps it did.. But without it the cat won’t learn anything, will it? And what is a human being without curiosity? Even a Talmudist has curiosity. Do you want to know what moves a Talmudist? What he is curious about? What kind of profound questions Talmudists ponder and debate in their yeshivot (plural of: yeshiva)?
Let’s have a look at some of them:
Are you allowed to pick your nose on the Sabbath?
Are you allowed to kill a flea on the Sabbath?
What size breasts are required for a girl to be considered an adult?
Is it permitted to have sex with a mouse or fly or mosquito in the room?
If urinating from the roof of the synagogue are you permitted to hold your sexual organ?
Is it permitted on a Sabbath to give a piece of bread to a midget who is less than 30 cm?
If a man falls off a bench and accidentally sexually penetrates his brother’s widow who lies below him on the floor does he thereby contract a levirate marriage? (Just think about this one for a moment!)
The above are, admittedly, some of the more bizarre questions but this kind of far-fetched nonsense is indeed the bread and butter of the Talmudist’s mental diet. Hilarious, isn’t it?
The pre-occupation of Jewish sages with sexual and excretory functions is truly staggering! Does this perhaps explain why Jews are such great purveyors of pornography and sexual aberration?
Talmudic sages just love to discuss dirt and smut; any sort of dirt and smut. Especially if it is about goyim!
Gentiles prefer sex with cows. Abodah Zarah 22a-22b
Adam had sexual intercourse with all the animals in the Garden of Eden. Yebamoth 63a
There is not a whore in the world that the Talmudic sage Rabbi Eleazar has not had sex with. On one of his whorehouse romps, Rabbi Eleazar leanred that there was one particular prostitute residing in a whorehouse near the sea, who would receive a bag of money for her services. He took a bag of money and went to her, crossing seven rivers to do so. During their intercourse the prostitute farted. After this the whore told Rabbi Eleazar: “Just as this gas will never return to my anus, Rabbi Eleazar will never get to heaven. Abodah Zarah 17a
Are you perhaps beginning to suspect that the Talmud is NOT the work of intellectual and moral giants but of imbeciles and perverts! Whether Jew or Gentile – do we really want these sick puppies to administer law and sit in judgement over us?
If this was all there was to be found in the Talmud we could have a good laugh and turn our backs on it. But there is an aspect to it that the Jews are eager to hide from the non-Jewish world – a side that presents a clear and present danger to non-Jews. Something that should set alarms bells ringing: undisguised hatred of the non-Jew! We cannot afford to laugh this off and walk away!
A heathen who studies the Torah deserves death…it is our inheritance, not theirs… Naturally, they wouldn’t want their anti-human criminality revealed in the Talmud to become common knowledge.
The Talmud Berakoth 58a teaches that anyone deserves death, including a Jew, who reveals what the Talmud says about non-Jews because such revelation will make Gentiles angry (You bet it does!) and thus lead to the suppression of Judaism.
Have you ever wondered why the Talmud has been burnt so often and in so many places? Could it, perhaps, be that the Gentiles did find out what the Talmud teaches about them? Could it, perhaps, be that the Gentiles did find out how they can be lied to, defrauded and exploited or worse, done away with? And all of it sanctioned by the God of the Jews!
The Talmudic view of non-Jews is neatly summed up in the words of Rabbi Shneur Zalman of Liadi, founder of the Lubavitch Chabad movement, one of the most active hate-mongering Jewish sects in the world, the very same bunch of morons that want to impose their laws on us! All Jews are good by nature, all non-Jews are evil by nature. The Jews are creation’s crowning glory, the non-Jews are the scum of the earth.
A Jew need not pay a non-Jew wages owed him for work done. Sanhedrin 57a
If a Jew finds an object lost by a gentile it does not have to be returned. Baba Mezia 24a (He is, however, encouraged to return the item if this act would lead to praise for the Jew and his God. That’s “honesty” for you!)
Jews may use lies to circumvent a Gentile. Baba Kamma 113a
The teachings of the Talmud are oriented towards the worship of God. There is no morality for its own sake simply because it is the right thing! There is NO pity or mercy or love for anyone needy or weak or down-trodden simply because he is a human being. No, he has to be a Jew to be worthy of these sentiments and worthy of help; non-Jews don’t count. What of Deuteronomy 10,19? Does it not command the Jew to love the stranger? Yes, but the word “stranger” is NOT interpreted to refer to a non-Jew but to a convert, a definition which actually manages to demean the non-Jew as well as the convert! There is also, as their ritual slaughter method proves, no compassion whatsoever for animals.
Love, mercy, pity and compassion are commanded – is that even possible? – and valued only inasfar as they serve the Jews and their God. Do they perhaps hate the non-Jew so much because they can see in him something they themselves do not possess – the capacity for unselfish conduct? Are Jews jealous and envious because deep down they understand that the non-Jew has something that dwarfs their own miserly hoard of ill-gotten material wealth by many orders of magnitude: a compassionate heart?
From Maimonides, one of Jewry’s greatest scholars:
“….. but when Israel rules over them (the Gentiles), we are forbidden to suffer idolaters (the Gentiles) amongst us, even if it is only temporary or while traveling from place to place for business; none of them shall pass through our land until they accept upon themselves the seven Noahide commandments as it is said, ‘They shall not dwell in your land’ — not even for an hour’.”
The rabid racism and genocidal mania found in the pages of the Talmud absolutely boggle the mind. You do not even need to know Hebrew and Aramaic or actually read the Talmud itself. Read the Five Books of Moses, the Torah/Pentateuch, which establish the principles upon which the Talmud only expands.
From ancient times: Even the best of the gentiles should all be killed Rabbi Simon ben Yohai
And more recently Rabbi Yaacov Perrin said: One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail. (NY Daily News, Feb. 28, 1994, p.6). These people expect us to trust them?
A specially virulent hatred and obscene language is reserved for Jesus and Mary and for Christians and their beliefs and practices in general. You do not have to be a Christian to be outraged and disgusted! And at the same time as they indulge their utter contempt for and hatred of the non-Jewish societies that have graciously accepted them they expect, in all seriousness, to be embraced and respected, if not actually loved as the Elder Brothers.
Is there perhaps something that can be done which could lead to the peaceful co-existence of Jews and non-Jews? In theory – yes! I am reminded here of the Alcoholic Anonymous maxim: when the alcoholic acknowledges the fact that he is an alcoholic and needs help then and only then will he be ready to address the problem and solve it.
By the same token: when Jews admit the fact that their claim of being God’s Chosen People and their belief in intellectual and moral superiority are delusions; when they are ready to relinquish the idea that the world exists for their sake, and theirs only; when they take control of their lives and start thinking for themselves instead of outsourcing their thinking and moral decisions to their criminally insane religious and secular leaders; when they are showing remorse for past crimes and willingness to make amends; when they are prepared to jettison the toxic teachings of the Torah and the Talmud then we can talk about peaceful co-existence!
To Jews I say this:
You have had thousands of years to prove your worth and you failed miserably! A One People – One World – One God religion under your aegis? Forget it! You are not fit to usher in the Brotherhood of Man. You and your religion, so-called, are not fit to inspire and guide anybody! And you sure as hell are not fit to exercise jurisdiction over anybody!
You belong on the dunghill of history!
DILLING On the Talmud
Israel Shahak On Judaism
www.cais-soas.com/index.htm On the Pharisees and their connection to Zoroastrianism
www.daatemet.org More On Talmudic Lunacy and Dishonesty
www.come-and-hear.com/ On the Talmud and its Teachings
Israeli vandals spray paint “Jesus is a monkey – Mary is a cow”
By Michael Hoffman
Israelis have vandalized a Catholic monastery and spray-painted in Hebrew on a wall:
“Jesus is a monkey, Mary is a cow.”
Late in the evening of Monday, March 31, 2014, vandals slashed automobile tires and defaced the walls of the Catholic Deir Rafat monastery, near the Israeli city of Beit Shemesh, 19 miles west of Jerusalem. Beit Shemesh is home to the Ramat Beit Shemesh Bet neighborhood, a Talmudic, “ultra-Orthodox” enclave. On Tuesday morning, the monks awoke to discover the blasphemy. Other monasteries in the Israeli state have suffered repeated attacks. In August, 2013, a firebomb was hurled at the neighboring Beit Jimal monastery. Since 2009, twenty-nine Christian monasteries have been desecrated in the Israeli state and the occupied West Bank.
These attacks derive from the teachings of contempt for Jesus (BT Gittin 56b, 57a) and Mary (BT Sanhedrin 106A) which the Talmud imparts to its followers. The Establishment media and the Pope of Rome usually have little or nothing to say about these Judaic blasphemies, whereas had these crimes been directed at a synagogue located in close proximity to an “ultra-traditional Catholic enclave,” then the outrage of the pope, the professors and the media would reverberate around the world, with cries of “Antisemitism is spiraling out of control!” The result would be another indoctrination campaign concerning “hate speech and the rising tide of anti-Jewish bigotry.”
When the animosity emanates from the Talmudic religion of counterfeit-Israel however, as in this case, there is a massive, collective silence which testifies to the fact that anti-Christian Talmudic hate speech is not regarded as being worthy of exposure, protest or condemnation. It is by suppressing reports of attacks like the one that occurred on this monastery, while magnifying anything remotely similar that befalls rabbinic people and places, that the impression is deceitfully conveyed by the media and the leaders of Judeo-Churchianity that “hate” is a one-way street: mostly a matter of the victimization of the eternally persecuted “Holy People” by wicked Christians who must make amends, undergo sensitivity training, repudiate their heritage, and beg forgiveness of the “Jews.”
To this we say, “God exalted Him to the highest place and gave Him the name that is above every name, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow.” (Philippians 2:9-10). Jesus said to His followers that to have our prayers answered we should ask in His Name (John 14:13). We will defend His Name and Gospel to the utmost, while praying for the bigoted and deluded people who, to the detriment of their eternal salvation, defile and defame Jesus, the Messiah of True Israel.
For further research:
2012 blasphemy against the Trappist monastery in Latrun, near Jerusalem Allegedly perpetrated by Micky Rosenfeld from Bnei Brak (a center of Talmudic Judaism):
by Anthony Migchels on June 5, 2014
Capitalism is Usury. Its defining belief is ‘return on investment’. This is an extension of the ‘time value’ of money, which is the central tenet of modern economics. Capitalism is unthinkable without banking and banking is institutionalized Usury.
Usury is Plutocracy. Compound interest makes it unavoidable that the very richest own everything in generations.
And this is indeed what happened: Capitalism is one huge global monopoly. All the major banks own each other and most Transnationals plus a huge chunk of land. This juggernaut was built with the plunder of Usury.
We have all seen that Rothschild was worth 50 billion in 1850. At 5% per year, this fortune would now be a trillion, at 8% per year Rothschild would now be worth hundreds of trillions.
This is why it has been said that ‘compound interest is the strongest force in the Universe’.
This is Usurious Usurpation.
The Rise of Capitalism
Modern Capitalism was first clearly visible in the Dutch Republic, where Italian Banking, expelled Iberian Jews, the Reformation, naval power and the acquisition of huge trade fortunes came together in the Amsterdam Empire, which would outshine its much bigger Spanish, British and even French competitors until the mid seventeenth century.
Everything that defines modern Capitalism was either invented or came to fruition in Amsterdam. The first Stock Exchange, Multinationals (the East Indies Company, which would rule over Indonesia with unrestrained Corporatocracy for centuries), and most importantly, a Central Bank, the ‘Amsterdamsche Wisselbank’. And of course a huge pile of money, that would be the envy of Europe even long after its ‘glory’ had subsided.
Amsterdam also saw the first bubble: the Tulip mania, 1637. This typical banker device, blowing bubbles with easy credit and then popping them by calling in loans, would haunt Western economies for centuries to come.
The Dutch Republic resulted from a Calvinist rebellion against Catholic Spain. Calvin is considered by many to have been Jewish. He openly defended Usury. This was in an era that the Medieval era of Usury prohibition was in terminal decline.
Calvinist thought was also infected by the typically Jewish notion that wealth is a sign of God’s favor.
Notwithstanding Usury prohibition, Jewish Usury had been a huge issue throughout the Middle Ages and it does not require a great leap of the imagination to see that Capitalism is in fact the modern equivalent of what was once known as Jewish Usury.
Jewish fortunes and their methods played a large part in Amsterdam. Their ships would also dominate the growing slave trade on America. They had come from Spain, after being expelled in 1492. Holland was known at the time for its ‘tolerance’.
Amsterdam was the first great star of high finance. Opulence acquired through trade became Capital, looking for returns. And here we see that Capitalism is about finance, not production or consumption. Finance rules over producers, workers, consumers, farmers, crafstmen and industrialists alike.
They lend to those they control or want to control and withhold credit to those for whom they have no purpose. Usury gives them their take of any venture. By keeping money scarce, they keep labor cheap. This is how money rules.
Moving on to Britain
Amsterdam peaked in 1648, when the peace of Westphalia ended both the 80 year war for independence with Spain and the 30 year war in Germany. But after the peak comes the decline and already in the fifties problems began to mount when Cromwell landed a blow on Dutch naval supremacy with the Acts of Navigation.
The Jews had been expelled from Britain in 1290. This was a few decades after the Magna Carta, which clearly points at Jewish Usury as a huge problem at the time.
Cromwell, who was a calvinist Puritan, negotiated extensively with Amsterdam Jews about resettlement. He probably was a tool of Jewish/Amsterdam finance to begin with.
Resettlement came with the promise of making London a better Amsterdam. And while British merchants (and many others too) were against the readmittance of the Jews, Cromwell went ahead anyway. The Puritans were optimistic and naive and thought they could ‘redeem’ the Jews. But while Jewish Capital indeed pushed Britain’s Empire to unprecedented heights, there was no redemption: by the end of the 19th century the British Aristocracy had been entirely Judaized.
While Cromwell, as a tool of Amsterdam Imperialism, ultimately failed, the Jews did not relent and they had a second shot at London with the Glorious Revolution, when William III of Orange, Stadtholder of Holland, became William III of Britain and the Dutch Republic and England were united in a personal union.
He repaid his financial backers by chartering the Bank of England in 1694 and this was the official entry of Capitalism in Britain. It came with the end of sovereign money and the ascent of Gold: until then the British economy had been financed with Talley Sticks, simple pieces of wood issued by the King. British partners in the Bank paid for their shares with them, but the first thing the Bank did was take them out of circulation. The Bank of England is only the eigth bank in history and is the second oldest to survive today.
The United States
The real history of the United States is not about the War of Independence and the Constitution. It’s about banking.
The United States did not revolt over ‘taxes without representation’. According to Benjamin Franklin the real reason for the War of Independence was that Whitehall forced scarce money through Britain’s Gold Standard on the Colonies, who had thrived with their own Colonial Scrip. A depression was the inevitable result.
Only a few years after nominal independence, Hamilton’s first Bank of the United States brought Capitalism to the United States. It was closed in 1800, but in 1816, in the aftermath of the war with Britain, a second Bank of the United States (a privately owned corporation) was opened with a 20 year charter.
The heroic President Andrew Jackson did not renew this charter and miraculously survived an attempt on his life. His last words, ‘I killed the Bank’ still ring triumphantly through the ages. Unfortunately, he failed to replace it with a decent monetary system and the country was plunged in a depression because of a tanking money supply.
This left the Whigs, Abraham Lincoln prominently among them, plenty of scope to campaign for a new ‘National’ Bank, which came in the aftermath of the Civil War.
In 1913 the Federal Reserve Bank was founded. This privately owned corporation is owned by primarily Jewish ‘member banks’. The presidents of the Federal Reserve are always Jewish and by far most of its board members are too. It’s no secret Wall Street is run by the Jews and is now the global standard bearer of Jewish Usury with derivatives being the scam du jour.
Of course there are Americans in Wall Street too, just as there are Englishmen in the City or Germans in Deutsche Bank, but whereas these nationalities compete amongst each other, the Jews are strong in all nations and this gives them supremacy.
Equally true is that the Jewish many gain nothing from the banking prowess of their ‘elites’. They may have some privileges, but on the other hand they’re also easily duped into nasty affairs or sacrificed like the pawns we all are.
But considering the above history of Capitalism and Jewish Usury, it is very hard to avoid the conclusion that they are the same thing.
YHVH emphatically orders the Jews several times to conquer the world with Usury in Deutoronomy, for instance: “15:6 For the LORD thy God blesseth thee, as he promised thee: and thou shalt lend unto many nations, but thou shalt not borrow; and thou shalt reign over many nations, but they shall not reign over thee.”
Pivotal documents from the medieval era squarely point at Jewish Usury. We have already mentioned the Magna Carta, but there is also for instance the Quran: ‘That they (the Jews) took usury, though they were forbidden; and that they devoured men’s substance wrongfully;- we have prepared for those among them who reject faith a grievous punishment.’ (sura 4.161)
Capitalism and its ‘return on investment’ is clearly the successor of medieval Jewish Usury. It arose during the destruction of medieval Usury prohibition. Its typical devices, Usury, Banking, the Stock Exchange, asset bubbles, Transnationals, all were already present in Amsterdam. It was this force that migrated to Britain and the US. It was in these three financial Empires that Captitalism showed its unrestrained imperialist designs.
Already the poor lose up to 50% of their income to Usury, mostly passed on by producers in prices. The middle classes are somewhat better off, but they are being decapitated everywhere. Usury only benefits the richest 10%, while most of the money ends up with the ‘fabulously’ wealthy.
The enslavement is total: most people work the first two and half days of the week to pay off the bank. Even if they have no debts.
And we face not only enslavement, but extinction. Mass immigration, combined with the demographic catastrophy caused by the trinity of feminism, the not-so-gay lobby, and sexual ‘liberation’, is now threatening to actually destroy the white race. Whites are expected to be a minority all over the West in 2050/2060 and irrelevant by the end of the century.
Capitalism is the core of the Jewish Question. All their other depravities, including Zionism and (Cultural) Marxism were built and financed from the Capitalist powerbase.
The Jewish Question can only be reasonably resolved by reforming money and ending its rule through Usury.
The atrocities below are in not in chronological order nor is this list a comprehensive compilation.
There are simply too many such genocidal events in our history to list them all ……….
Although there is no scientific evidence to support the Theory of Evolution it is nevertheless being presented as a rock-solid fact and shamelessly taught as such in our educational institutes – schools, colleges and universities – as are many other “science-backed” fictions.
By the same token: Although there is no evidence, scientific or otherwise, to support the holocaust narrative, although there is, in fact, a veritable mountain of proof that it is a bloody hoax, it is still being presented to the world as a historic fact and promoted ad nauseam in the Jew-owned or Jew-controlled mainstream media, together with the most disgusting rabid anti-Gentilism, i.e. the vilification of the German people.
Aren’t those of us who live in a Western democracy lucky that we have freedom of speech? If you do not believe in Charles Darwin’s Theory of Evolution or Albert Einstein’s Theory of Relativity, if you reject Robert Schoch’s dating of the Sphinx or have any doubts about the validity of the science of genetics you are free to disagree and make your views known publicly. But not if you have doubts about the holocaust!!!! Or even just ask questions!!!!
We have freedom of speech, haven’t we, and the days of the Inquisition are gone. Sorry – we haven’t and they aren’t!
The Inquisition of the medieval Church has been replaced by the Inquisition of the Synagogue of Satan! The agenda was and is the same in both cases: to control your mind and to lord it over you! And their time-tested methods are identical: the use of psychological and physical terror!
The Yid, who views Himself as a divine being, needs the Gentiles to worship, exalt and serve Him.That is the sole purpose of a Gentile’s existence and He makes no secret of it. You are required to submit yourself to His dictates, to be at His beck and call, to make yourself available for exploitation. Asking questions, disobedience or defiance is blasphemy which will be cruelly punished.
The only reason that Jews are not burning or boiling people publicly, as was the wont of the Catholic Inquisition, is the fact that they aren’t quite powerful enough – yet. It is an inescapable fact, though, that they are sadistic monsters when the power to act is given to them!
The list of the Chosenites’ crimes is long and goes back millenia so I’ll limit myself to the more recent past. Any honest study of the history of the last hundred years or so will reveal that Jewish-led and Jewish-financed communism is responsible for the death of close to a hundred and fifty million people all over the world. Of this you hardly ever hear in the mainstream media. Thanks to the deep deep pockets of the Jew and his unrelenting propaganda the world has been brainwashed into accepting the myth of six million holocausted Jews as an indisputable fact.
Yet seven decades have passed since the end of WWII and the proponents of the sacrosanct Dogma of the Holocaust have failed miserably to present hard evidence for any of their claims. Naturally, you cannot present something that you do not have! That does not bother the Yid. He simply gets his whores in politics to outlaw free speech and – hey presto! – problem solved! Or so he thinks!
The holocaust is, undoubtedly, a lucrative industry, profitable both for the State of Israel and for the staggering number of Jews who “miraculously” survived their stay in the German detention camps; many of them survived several camps and some even survived the gas chambers! Yes, really! Cross my heart and hope to die!
Eli Wiesel survived, by his own admission, a dozen of the worst camps. In Time magazine March 19,1985, he states: “In Buchenwald they sent 10,000 persons to their deaths each day. I was always in the last hundred near the gate. They stopped. Why?” Hmm! Let me think, Friend “Weasel” …. could it be because you weren’t there and the camps were never death camps at all?
Here is another Yiddish fairy tale: Gassed Six Times
These “miracle survivors” are now raking in generous reparations for their alleged suffering, write best-selling books, sell movie rights to Hollywood, appear on TV and go on lecture tours to schools to poison the guileless minds of youngsters with their sick self-worship and anti-Gentile agenda. As the song goes: “There is no business like shoah business!” Sure, they love all that money but I think that this is essentially no more than a very welcome bonus.
I have no doubt that the real purpose of the holocaust scam is to create a distraction to divert the world’s attention away from one of their most recent genocidal rampages, i.e. the crimes committed by the Jewish Bolshevik regime, crimes that prove that they are now and have always been the most rabid racists and genocidal maniacs in the history of mankind.
Count Cherep-Spiridovich, a member of the old Russian aristocracy, wrote about the destruction of his country in a book entitled The Secret World Government or The Hidden Hand, published in 1926.
He said: ‘Evil is now enthroned in Moscow. The promoters are not Russians but Jews … the Czars were murdered by this Hidden Hand.”
The murder of the Tsar, his wife, as well as their children who were surely innocent, was followed by the systematic murder of Christian Russians and the engineered Ukrainian famine, both of them events that cost millions upon millions of lives.
The American Rohrbach Commission reports in the Defender magazine (October, 1933):
“The whole cement floor of the execution hall of the Jewish Cheka of Kiev was flooded with blood; it formed a level of several inches. It was a horrible mixture of blood, brains and pieces of skull. All the walls was bespattered with blood. Pieces of brains and of scalps were sticking to them. A gutter of 25 centimeters wide by 25 centimeters deep and about 10 meters long was along its length full to the top with blood.
Some bodies were disemboweled, others had limbs chopped off, some were literally hacked to pieces. Some had their eyes put out the head, face and neck and trunk were covered with deep wounds. Further on, we found a corpse with a wedge driven into its chest. Some had no tongues. In a corner we discovered a quantity of dismembered arms and legs belonging to no bodies that we could locate.”
Here is another example of the merciful, shy and charitable Yid:
Solomon Morel, commandant of the Swietochlowice camp for Germans in southern Poland from February to November 1945, tortured inmates and is considered responsible for at least 1,538 deaths. He was charged by Polish authorities with the kind of atrocities the Yid is so fond of charging the Germans with, to wit: bashing children’s heads against a wall, torturing by sticking objects up an inmate’s anus, forcing women to parade naked in sub-zero temperatures, etc. etc. Israeli authorities facilitated his escape to Israel and, needless to say, will not extradite him.
Isn’t he a perfect specimen of the Jew, as described by Israeli Rabbi Dov Lior? Wouldn’t he make a wonderful FEMA camp commandant?
The Western Allies cannot claim the moral high ground. Their treatment of the defeated Germans was every bit as outrageous, every bit as criminal, as that of the Bolsheviks and inspired and egged on by the same Old-Testament blood-lust of the Yid working from behind the scenes. The Nuremburg tribunal and its total contempt for justice is all the proof anyone needs. This was Jewish mercy and Talmudic justice in action.
The nature of the Jew seems to be immutable. Read the Bible and learn what happened to the peoples of antiquity that the Jews were in contact with and then have a look at what is being done to the Palestinians today!
True to his psychopathic character the Yid always projects his own crimes on somebody else. Following the war the Germans were convenient scape-goats. Having just been vanquished they were in no position to defend themselves against the combination of Jewish lies and Allied guns.
The upheavals and confusion caused by the war made a wonderful smoke-screen. But the smoke is lifting now, thank God, and the karma of the Yid and his immoral minions amongst the non-Jews, is catching up with them which explains why they are so desperate to introduce their “hate crime” laws all over the world!
Our Yiddish Emperor has no clothes! But don’t you dare say so! Jewish response to anybody who tells the truth about them or who just dares to ask legitimate questions is utterly predictable: either complete and total silence or shrill accusations of anti-Semitism, denial of plainly obvious facts on the one hand and churning out monstrous lies on the other, suppression of free speech via their “hate crime” laws, vicious smear campaigns, vindictive litigation, physical attacks …….
Even a Jew is not spared if he does not toe the line as the example of Josef Burg, a holocaust denier, shows. He was beaten by Jewish thugs, shunned by the Jewish community and when he died he was denied burial in the Munich Jewish cemetary: http://www.whale.to/b/josef_ginsburg.html
You need proof of my claim that these creatures are neither merciful, nor shy nor charitable but murderous lunatics? There is so much material that I do not know where to begin. Let’s have a look at the Torah, the foundation of the Jewish religion and its toxic laws. What do we find there?
“God” orders the Hebrews to exterminate the people of Jericho (Joshua 6:1-2, 20-24) “And they utterly destroyed all that was in the city, both man and woman, young and old, and ox, and sheep, and ass, with the edge of the sword.”
“God” commands the Hebrews to “utterly and mercilessly destroy” the seven nations that dwell in the Promised Land. They are also instructed to destroy everything of those cultures (Deuteronomy 7:1-6).
“God” orders the extermination of the inhabitants of Ai and their king (Joshua 8:1-2, 18-29) Twelve thousand were killed. “And Joshua burnt Ai, and made it an heap for ever, even a desolation unto this day.”
“God” orders extermination of the Amaleks (Deuteronomy 25:17-19) “… thou shalt blot out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven; thou shalt not forget it.”
Although millenia have passed the psyche of the Yid is now just as sick as it was then.
Merciful, shy and charitable, indeed! Let’s give President Truman the last word. Speaking of Jews he said:
“… yet when they have power, physical, financial or political, neither Hitler nor Stalin has anything on them for cruelty or mistreatment of the underdog.”
They are only two tenths of one percent of the population of the Earth. Why the hell do we allow them lord it over us? Isn’t it is long past time that we unite and put them out of business? What are you waiting for? If you are held back by fear I have heartening news for you: they are far more afraid of us than we are of them!
1) Which parasites have – throughout history while being commanded by their “Holy Books” – sucked dry every nation they have been in contact with, fattening themselves while inflicting misery and hardship, ruination and collapse on others with their usurious “money magic” acquired in Babylon – and now refined into the modern central banking system?
a) The Eskimos?
b) The Pygmies?
c) The Andorrans?
d) The Hobbits of The Shire?
e) A certain Middle Eastern tribe you are not allowed to name, let alone criticise?
2) Name the people that has caused – directly and/or by proxy – the most turmoil and bloodshed for fun and above all for profit by means of carefully orchestrated social strife and upheavals, by means of skillfully engineered political and economic crises, revolutions, wars and genocidal massacres
a) Genghis Khan’s Mongols
b) Attila’s Huns
c) The Germans
d) The Hobbits of The Shire
e) A certain Middle Eastern tribe you are not allowed to name, let alone criticise
3) What degenerate people is doing its utmost to corrupt the moral fibre and to lower the standards of every nation by glorifying and spreading its own psychopathy through the Internet, newspapers, magazines, books, TV and Hollywood entertainment: i.e sexual aberration of every kind, racism, filth of every description, obsession with blood and gore and cruelty, Satanism ……. and much more – not to forget crude puerile toilet humour?
a) Amazonian tribesmen/women?
d) The Hobbits of The Shire?
e) A certain Middle Eastern tribe you are not allowed to name, let alone criticise?
4) What people is the most enthusiastic advocate of open borders, multiculturalism and miscegenation for every nation, except its own?
a) The Sherpas of Nepal?
b) The Andaman Islanders?
c) The Tungus People of Siberia?
d) The Hobbits of The Shire?
e) A certain Middle Eastern tribe you are not allowed to name, let alone criticise?
5) Name the people that has reserved for itself – on the basis of its self-proclaimed moral and intellectual superiority and at the behest of its so-called “God” – the right to entertain, express and act out – without any legal restraints or consequences! – the most rabid kind of racist sentiment vis-a-vis any nation or individual they do not like – mind, you, this includes the right to call for the genocide of White nations! – while at the same time introducing draconian hate-crime legislation to punish anybody who is even the tiniest bit critical of them, even if he speaks the truth – well, especially if he speaks the truth
a) The Australian Aborigines
b) The Tibetans
c) The Grey Aliens
d) The Hobbits of The Shire
e) A certain Middle Eastern tribe you are not allowed to name, let alone criticise
6) Which of the world’s many nations of peace-loving, merciful and kind-hearted people has a unique millenia-long history of suffering of holocaustian proportions inflicted upon it by evil, brutal, barbaric and criminally insane murderous enemies for no reason whatsoever, while itself being totally innocent of any wrong-doing – suffering that is so unique, so unspeakable that it can never ever be made amends for but can only be eased and soothed a little bit by generous never-ending monetary compensation, by mollycoddling the victims in perpetuity and by handing them a carte blanche to do as they please without having to answer to anybody?
a) The Gypsies?
b) The Native Americans?
c) The Armenians?
d) The Hobbits of The Shire?
e) A certain Middle Eastern tribe you are allowed to name and expected to admire and indulge
There are, of course, many more questions that could be asked but the above shall suffice!
And now let’s have a look at how well you did!
The correct answer to Questions 1 to 5 is, of course: d) The Hobbits!
If you answered e) to Questions 1 to 5 you are, in fact, an Anti-Semite! This is, unfortunately, a very serious problem. It is strongly suggested that you consult a psychiatrist, preferably a Jewish one who bases his approach on Siegmund Fraud. Long-winded fraudulent, sorry! Fraudian talk therapy and a course of expensive psychotropic medication will make you sane – guaranteed! Your investment of time and money, however, will be worth it. Just think of the tremendous good you are doing for your mental health and stability – and not to forget for your psychiatrist’s bank account!
The correct answer to Question No 6 is: e) The Jews
Question No 6 was, admittedly, a trick question. Did you notice? Even if you got all other answers wrong: as long as you answered e) to Question No 6 there is clearly still hope for you. Psychiatric treatment may not be necessary; you just need to release your inner shabbes goy and you will be ok! According to the wisdom of the Talmudic sages this is your divinely ordained destiny!
Contact your local Jewish community for practical advice on how to go about this and for on-going emotional support on this most virtuous and glorious path!
‘Gentile sperm leads to barbaric offspring’
Rabbi Dov Lior, a senior authority on Jewish law in the Religious Zionism movement, asserted recently that a Jewish woman should never get pregnant using sperm donated by a non-Jewish man – even if it is the last option available.
According to Lior, a baby born through such an insemination will have the “negative genetic traits that characterize non-Jews.” Instead, he advised sterile couples to adopt. Lior addressed the issue during a women’s health conference held recently at the Puah Institute, a fertility clinic. His conservative stance negated a ruling widely accepted by rabbis, which states that sperm donated by a non-Jew is preferable to that of an anonymous Jew, who might pose a genealogical risk.
“Sefer HaChinuch (a book of Jewish law) states that the character traits of the father pass on to the son,” he said in the lecture. “If the father in not Jewish, what character traits could he have? Traits of cruelty, of barbarism! These are not traits that characterize the people of Israel.”
Lior identified Jews as merciful, shy and charitable (emphasis mine BJW) – qualities that he claimed could be inherited. “A person born to Jewish parents, even if they weren’t raised on the Torah – there are things that are passed on (to him) in the blood, it’s genetic,” he explained. “If the father is a gentile, then the child is deprived of these things.
“I even read in books that sometimes the crime, the difficult traits, the bitterness – a child that comes from these traits, it’s no surprise that he won’t have the qualities that characterize the people of Israel,” he added.
The anti-Gentile racism of this tribe of psychopaths knows no bounds!!
If you are not disgusted and outraged check your pulse!
You may not be alive anymore!
The Racial Discrimination Act can be turned against you!!!
Some pictures of the “merciful, shy and charitable” Yid:
How can anyone not love these shy, merciful and charitable people?
The Kol Nidre
It is based on the Talmud Book of Nedarim, 23a-23b which says:
“And he who desires that none of his vows made during the year shall be valid, let him stand at the beginning of the year and declare “Every vow which I make in the future, shall be null” providing that he remembers this at the time of the vow.”
The setting of the Kol Nidre – in a place of worship and in a religious context – conveys the impression that this is a religious ceremony. This is emphatically NOT the case!
The Kol Nidre is neither a prayer nor an oath but a declaration – a legal formula in Aramaic designed to render null and void all vows, oaths, promises and obligations – past, present and future.
The Hebrew word for this legal procedure is heter: a noun derived from the verb le’hatir (to untie, to permit). It is used to mean a dispensation, i.e. special permission to do something that is normally prohibited.
According to halacha (Jewish law) legal declarations MUST be made during the hours of daylight.
Furthermore: courts of law cannot be in session on a Sabbath or a Yom Tov (Holy Day). The Kol Nidre is therefore recited on the eve of Yom Kippur, ideally starting and finishing just before the sun sets. However, as long as Kol Nidre begins during the daytime it does not matter if it continues into the night.
Mishnah Berurah 619:5
Mateh Efrayim 619:11
Yom Kippur begins after sundown. Although the reciting of the Kol Nidre and the Yom Kippur service are placed back to back they are technically two separate things.
In addition to the rules regarding the time the following conditions must be met by the participant:
Each MUST fully understand the meaning and implications of the Kol Nidre – otherwise it does not have legal force.
(Chayei Adam 138:8 and Kitzur Shulchan Aruch 128:16)
Each MUST recite Kol Nidre along with the chazan (cantor), loud enough for a person nearby to hear (a witness!). It must not be spoken too softly as that would render it invalid.
(Minchas Yitzchak 9:61)
(Shulchan Aruch Harav 619:3)
Care is taken to ensure that the Kol Nidre complies with all relevant legal requirements. Care is taken to impress upon the congregants the fact that this procedure has the force of law! The conclusion is inescapable: the Kol Nidre is meant to be seen as legitimate and valid under Jewish law!
The Sifrei Torah (Torah Scrolls) are taken out of the Ark, the shrine where they are stored when not in use. Three congregants represent the three dayanim, i.e. judges of a Beit Din, a Jewish court of law. The three invoke the authority/jurisdiction of two courts (one divine and one human) and grant God’s and the assembly’s permission to proceed by reciting the following words:
“By the authority of the Court on High and by authority of the court down here, by the permission of One Who Is Everywhere and by the permission of this congregation, we hold it lawful to pray with sinners”.
The cantor then chants the Kol Nidre declaration three times:
All vows, obligations, oaths or anathemas, pledges of all names, which we have vowed, sworn, devoted, or bound ourselves to, from this day of atonement, until the next day of atonement (whose arrival we hope for in happiness) we repent, aforehand, of them all, they shall all be deemed absolved, forgiven, annulled, void and made of no effect; they shall not be binding, not have any power; the vows shall not be reckoned vows, the obligations shall not be obligatory, nor the oaths considered as oaths”.
Cantor and congregation say together three times:
The Lord said: I pardon them according to your words”
The Kol Nidre is a danger to society – as is any secret oath such as a Masonic oath. No society can survive, much less flourish, if men cannot trust their fellowman. Secret oaths undermine that trust! This is all the more dangerous if those who have participated in the Kol Nidre or have sworn any kind of secret oath are in a position of power over their fellowman.
To be suspicious of Jews, given the highly controversial Kol Nidre, does NOT mean that you are an anti-Semite. To be suspicious of anybody who participates in the Kol Nidre and/or has sworn any kind of secret oath is NOT paranoid but a normal and healthy reaction of sane and self-respecting men and women. Let nobody tell you otherwise!
To protect yourself from potential harm you have the right to exercise caution when dealing with anyone who is not known to you personally. Given the disproportionately high numbers of Jews and Freemasons in the legal profession and in the judiciary you have the right to challenge anyone in a court of law to ensure that justice is not only done but seen to be done!
Anyone who is a party to a lawsuit and who has either participated in the Kol Nidre rite or sworn a secret oath, such as a member of a masonic lodge, ought to recuse himself/herself automatically. No member of the legal profession will volunteer such information so it is up to you to put them on the spot.
The interpretation – routinely given by Jewish religious authorities and fully intended to mislead – is as follows:
a) the Kol Nidre has nothing to do with vows and promises between a man and his fellowman but refers exclusively to vows and promises made to God
b) contractual obligations and oaths taken in a court of law are not included in the dispensation
BULLSHIT! The text is clear and unambiguous. It is inclusive of ALL vows, oaths, obligations and pledges! Contractual obligations and oaths taken in a court of law are not excluded nor is such an exemption implied!
And anyway, the interpretations of Jewish laws by Jewish legal authorities (i.e. the rabbis) are – even if correct! – entirely irrelevant in a non-Jewish court of law!!!
You have the right and the power to challenge the duplicity of Jews and Masons!
There are ways to counter the Kol Nidre and secret oaths!!!
Jews, it seems, are a puzzle not only to Gentiles but even to themselves. You would think – wouldn’t you – that, having been around for such a long time, they ought to have a clear idea of who and what they are and where they come from.
Throw together some Jews and let them debate the question Who is a Jew? and you will certainly have a lively – make that a heated! – discussion.
This debate has become a very hot issue for the state of Israel as the answer has implications for anyone who wishes to move there under the Law of Return. This law not only grants a Jew the right to immigrate but automatically confers citizenship immediately upon arrival.
Is a Jew someone who adheres to and is defined by the religion known as Judaism, be its flavour Reconstructionist, Liberal, Conservative, Orthodox, Ultra-Orthodox or even Karaite? Or is he a member of a clearly definable racial/ethnic group, i.e.a descendant of the ancient Judeans? Or perhaps Judaism is something so unique that it transcends any man-made definitions and becomes an ineffable mysterium of cosmic proportions?
And where exactly do converts fit in?
Hilaire Belloc, Anglo-French writer and historian, suggested something less awe-inspiring than a “cosmic mystery” by comparing Jews to chameleons: “… adjusted their notions of themselves to suit the varying circumstances with which they were confronted. They were a race when it suited them, a nationality when necessity demanded it, a religious group, and, finally, a cultural unit when the situation made such a status desirable.“
There is no shortage of definitions and descriptions, from the down-to-Earth to the mystical to the ludicrous, but none that would satisfy everybody. The only answer Jews will be able to agree upon is this: “We are not non-Jews!” Facetious as this may sound it pretty much hits the nail on the head!
The truth is: most Jews, exactly like their Gentile neighbours, are really nothing more than sheeple, ignorant and too lazy to educate themselves and do their own thinking. Having outsourced their thinking to the rabbis, self-appointed makers and interpreters of Jewish law, they are easy to dupe and manipulate. Religious and secular leaders cannot afford to allow the rank and file member of the tribe to reflect too deeply on certain matters for fear he might discover some disturbing facts that could shatter the grandiose self-image that has been so skillfully crafted and carefully cultivated over millenia.
In a rather nebulous sort of way most Jews, believers and non-believers alike, consider themselves, members of a “special” people, i.e. a group with a unique religion, a unique mission for mankind, a history of unique suffering and – above all – a unique genome that goes back thousands of years to Abraham, the alleged founding father of the tribe.
The picture they have of themselves is a delusion. The quote below illustrates how woefully inadequate their capacity for self-reflection, how ill-informed and superficial they are:
“Many Jews may not know much about Judaism, but we do know that we are somehow different because we are Jews — whatever that means. And we know that other Jews are somehow connected to us.”
Jewish author Gary Tobin, 1999 (emphasis mine BJW)
These ill-defined mystical notions (I call them wishy-washy!) are the source of their sense of self: something without a solid foundation – a castle in the clouds!
One more thing, Mr Tobin! Make that “Most Jews“! Not just “Many Jews“! The average convert to Judaism, having been compelled – as a pre-requisite for acceptance – to study the Jewish religion, history and the Hebrew language, oftentimes for a year or even more, is more informed on these matters than he who thinks that in order to be a proud Jew it is enough to be born Jewish, to eat “gefilte fish” and not be a Christian.
“Somehow different ...” – “Whatever that means ...” – “Somehow connected …“
Even atheist Zionists are firmly convinced that “somehow” their people, “whatever that means” is morally and intellectually superior to the Gentiles and it is equally obvious to them that the very same God they do not believe in promised them the Land of Israel to which they are “somehow connected“.
To Zionists who worship the Jewish “people” and revere the state of Israel as its embodiment, the concept of a “blood line” leading back to the ancient Israelites is of paramount importance. The revelation that Jews are not the descendants of the Israelites is anathema and must be resisted at all costs as it undermines claims that Jews are the rightful heirs of the Israelites and thus the rightful owners of Palestine.
There was a time, not too long ago, when you were considered an anti-Semite if you referred to Jews as a race. Now, however, Jews – ever the chameleons described by Belloc – are ready to call you an anti-Semite if you deny that they are a race, or at least a “people” with a shared genome.
It is easier to put the head in the sand than it is to think for yourself. It is psychologically more comforting to cling to the myth of being something special, the “Chosen People”, singled out by none other than God Himself and set apart from the “hoi polloi”, i.e. the rest of mankind.
Let’s have a look at this preposterous claim of descent from the ancient Israelites/Judeans.
The Bible itself informs us in the book of Exodus that the Israelites left Egypt accompanied by a “mixed multitude” without telling us who they were and how many, although the choice of words would seem to indicate a not insignificant number.
Some identify the Israelites with the Habiru, nomads that roamed in the area of the Fertile Crescent from Egypt in the West to Iran in the East. In this writer’s view, more likely than not, the “Israelites” were not even Israelites at that time but Egyptians, the adherents of the monotheistic religion Atenism, who were forced to flee for their lives after the death of the heretic Pharaoh Akhenaten, the founder of their religion.
Be that as it may! After the invasion of Canaan – more likely than not this was a very slow process of encroaching rather than a blitzkrieg-type of conquest – the Israelites, from the most humble peasant all the way up to royalty, mixed with their neighbours, informally through intermarriage and formally through conversion.
King David’s mother was a Moabite as was his great-grandmother, Ruth, a convert. King Solomon’s mother was a Hittite and he was said to have hundreds, if not thousands of wives, women of diverse lineage, e.g. Moabite, Ammonite, Edomite, and Hittite.
In doing so they were only following the example set by their ancestors: Abraham himself cohabited with Hagar, an Egyptian; Joseph married Asenath, an Egyptian and Moses married Zipporah, a Midianite and so on and so forth…….
Intermarriage has always been the cardinal offense a Jew can commit against his family and against the Jewish community. It is the religious equivalent of the political crime of high treason!
“I saw the Jews who had married women of Ashdod, Ammon, and Moab; and half of their children spoke the language of Ashdod, and they could not speak their own language. And I contended with them and cursed them and beat some of them and pulled out their hair…
Shall we then listen to you and do all this great evil and act treacherously against our God by marrying foreign women?”
The influx into the fold through intermarriage has nevertheless continued unabated throughout the centuries and millenia, despite Talmudic injunctions. A survey in 1990 of the American Jewish community revealed that 52% of all marriages by Jews in America were to non-Jews. Jewish scare mongers even compare this high rate of intermarriage found in the Western world to a “holocaust” (what a versatile and useful tool the word “holocaust” is!).
One study done in the USA found that 80% of the parents of non-Jewish spouses of Jews had positive attitudes about Jewish people, but only a quarter of the Jewish parents of a child married to a non-Jew had positive attitudes towards Gentiles. Can you spot the bigots??
Modern Judaism is certainly not a missionary religion – in fact it is reluctant to accept converts for any reason. But this was not always so. There were periods in history when Jews were actively proselytizing and welcoming converts into their midst. They were willing ‘to compass sea and land to make one proselyte’.
The Book of Esther, on which Purim is based, relates that many Persians converted when they realized the immense power the Jews wielded through Mordechai and Queen Esther,.
After the Romans conquered and destroyed Carthage many Carthaginians and Phoenicians (both groups of Semitic stock) became Jews. Iberia, today’s Spain, had been a colony of Carthage. The conversion by Carthaginians is the most likely origin of the large Jewish communities of Spain and North Africa.
The Hasmoneans converted the Idumeans of southern Judea and the Itureans of Galilee, albeit forcibly.
During the 1st century AD there emerged in what is now Kurdistan the Jewish kingdom of Adiabene.
Jewish historian Flavius Josephus is not the only one who testifies to the missionary zeal of the Jews. The Romans were concerned about it, as is evident from the writings of Horace, Seneca, Juvenal and Tacitus et al. Trying to stem the tide Emperor Hadrian even issued an edict to forbid circumcision of proselytes.
During the 5th century AD, a Jewish kingdom arose in present-day Yemen, whose descendants retained their Jewishness throughout the Islamic period to this very day. Most of them settled in Israel in the 1950s.
Arab chroniclers report the existence of Judaised Berber tribes. Jewish Berbers took part in the Moslem conquest of Spain thereby strenghtening the Jewish communities that had already been there since the days of Carthage.
The most spectacular mass conversion, however, occurred in the 8th century AD in the kingdom of Khazaria. It is the descendants of the Khazars that constitute the overwhelming majority of Jews, the so-called Ashkenazim.
The list above does not even include the many small tribes scattered all over Asia, incl. some Papua New Guineans, that fancy themselves to be descended from one of the ten lost tribes!
What do these episodes of intermarriage and mass conversion tell us about the homogenous character of Jewry? Anyone who still believes the Jews are a race ought to pay a visit to Israel and look at the people! Let’s not forget the Lemba tribe in Southern Africa who also claim to be Jews.
If you do visit you will find that Jews come in all shapes and sizes. This writer has himself lived in an immigration center in Israel (Kiryat Gad to be precise) and has first-hand knowledge of the religious-cultural and racial-ethnic diversity of the Jewish people. There were Jews from the UK and Chile, from Hungary and Italy, from Romania and Australia, from Argentina and the USSR. There were dark-skinned Jews from India (the ladies even wore saris!) and Falashim, Jews of Ethiopia, as black-skinned as any non-Jewish Ethiopian. They all had more in common with the people amongst whom they lived before coming to Israel than they had with one another. And while I have not yet met a Native American Jew, an Eskimo Jew or a Chinese Jew I do know that there are some.
After millenia of interacting with Gentile nations in myriad ways, despite enforced or self-imposed segregation, there is no people as mixed as the Jews. Jewry is a patchwork of races and no Jew can therefore convincingly claim to hail back to ancient Judea, let alone Abraham, but such a trivial matter does not shake the arrogance of the Jew. I have never come across anyone born Jewish who would openly acknowledge the certainty or even just the possibility that he himself is descended from a long line of converts. No, perish the thought! They are of the seed of Abraham! This boastful assumption of “racial purity” is beautifully put into words by Jewish novelist J Krantz in her autobiography:
“We were born of Jewish parents who were born of Jewish parents going back, I assume, for thousands of years, barring the occasional pogrom and rape. My ancestors were Jews as far back as you can possibly imagine. That alone is more than enough to make us Jews.”
Krantz, J., 2000, p. 325
So, tell me, Ms Krantz: “You assume that your ancestry goes back thousands of years? Guess what, so does mine and actually everybody else’s too! Of course, what you want to imply here is that your bloodline goes back – untainted by outsiders – all the way to the ancient Israelites and to Abraham. How do you know that? Your Khazar genes we can take as a given, I think. But how do you know that there isn’t a host of other ethnicities besides, say an Egyptian or two, a few Phoenicians, Ethiopians, Berbers, Romans or Greeks or God knows who else?” Give me a break!
Christians and Moslems will generally make a convert feel welcome. They will open their hearts and their homes. Jews on the other hand tend to be suspicious, stand-offish and unwelcoming to the point of rudeness or even open hostility.
Jews are willfully blind to the fact that their people is not now – and never was – the “genetic monolith” they believe it to be. Unwilling to look too closely at their own mongrelized origins, they are nevertheless ready to disparage converts at the drop of a hat. A convert may be a Jew on paper, he may join a congregation and move to Israel – but in the eyes of a “real” Jew he actually remains a goy.
“The most insidious and persuasive barrier to a convert’s full integration into the Jewish community derives from the passionate and often heated who-is-a-Jew debate. Underlying many of the arguments swirling around in this discussion is the (secret) conviction that true membership in the Jewish community can only be achieved by birth. All other comers can never be like us, not really, not in their hearts. But we cannot say this out loud.“
Jewish author Gary Tobin, 1999 (emphasis mine BJW)
Historian Arnold J. Toynbee maintains that Judaism as we know it was created in Babylon. He writes, “Judaism is a development of the Pre-Exilic religion of Judah that was created in and by the Babylonian diaspora and was imposed by it on the Jewish population in Judaea. … There has also been the aim of converting the gentile world to the worship of Yahweh under the aegis of a world-empire centred on Eretz Israel and ruled by ‘the Lord’s Anointed’: a coming human king of Davidic lineage.” (Reconsiderations, p. 486).
And just as Judaism is a concoction of religious ideas and practices borrowed from a variety of sources, such as Sumer and Canaan, from Atenist Egypt and above all Zoroastrian Persia, the Jewish “people” itself is nothing more than a Persian artifact, a tool created for the express purpose of world conquest!
Jewish Justice? There is no such animal! Jewish Vengeance then? Yes! In this they excel! To prove the point let us revisit one of the most infamous trials in world history.
Nuremberg – October 16, 1946 – After a Soviet-style show trial eleven high-ranking officials of defeated National Socialist Germany were hanged for their role in the “crimes” of the Third Reich.
Amongst them was Julius Streicher. Streicher had no part in either the planning or the conduct of World War II. He wasn’t even in the government. In fact, he was considered persona non grata by some powerful men such as Goering, Himmler, Hess and many others who agitated to have Streicher’s weekly newspaper, DER STURMER banned as being too anti-Semitic. During the war years Streicher was actually placed under house arrest by Hitler!
So what was his crime? In his newspaper Streicher had openly discussed the Jewish Problem. As he was self-evidently not guilty of any involvement in the war he was charged with “crimes against humanity by stirring up hatred against the Jews.” This was not then nor is it now a crime!
Unless you allow yourself to be fooled into thinking that the “rules and guidelines” of a commercial corporation, your government, so-called, are laws!
In brief: he was brought to justice Jewish style! Or put differently: he was lynched! He was innocent and died for his passionate commitment to expose Jews, Judaism and Zionism through his speeches and writings.
Hate crime! Sounds familiar, does it not? It should – because it is crystal-clear to anybody who has his eyes and ears open that the Yid is now busy, all over the world, to create so-called “hate crime laws”. The purpose of such laws is obvious: camouflaged as benevolent laws to protect minorities perceived to be vulnerable – ethnic, religious, political, etc. etc. – they are really intended to benefit only one such minority: Jewry!
These “laws” aim to prevent independent research, to eliminate dissent and to remove free speech. In other words: they aim to keep the world in continued darkness about the Chosenites’ nefarious activities, past, present and as planned for the future! In Germany, for example, you can go to jail for up to five years for the “hate crime” of holocaus denial. That’s unusually cruel punishment for something that no sane man would consider a crime, even if the holocaust were a proven fact which it definitely is not! If the Yid succeeds in his endeavour to introduce a New World Order then Streicher’s brutal fate may well be what is in store for those whom the Jews hate! And that’s pretty much every non-Jew!
Back to Nuremberg. Sreicher’s fate, like that of his co-defendants, was a foregone conclusion. The chief US prosecutor and a former US Attorney General, Robert Jackson, made no secret of the lawless nature of the tribunal by declaring:
a) that the tribunal “is a continuation of the war effort of the Allied nations”
b) that the tribunal “is not bound by the procedural and substantive refinements of our respective judicial or constitutional system …”
In other words: he was saying quite openly “To hell with justice!”
There were decent men possessed of a conscience who voiced their dissent – not unexpectedly, they were ignored.
In October 1946 US Senator Robert A. Taft stated:
“The trial of the vanquished by the victors cannot be impartial no matter how it is hedged about with the forms of justice”
Taft went on:
“About this whole judgment there is the spirit of vengeance, and vengeance is seldom justice. The hanging of the eleven men convicted will be a blot on the American record which we will long regret. In these trials we have accepted the Russian idea of the purpose of trials — government policy and not justice — with little relation to Anglo-Saxon heritage. By clothing policy in the forms of legal procedure, we many discredit the whole idea of justice in Europe for years to come.”
Wisconsin Representative Lawrence H. Smith stated in Congress: “The Nuremberg trials are so repugnant to the Anglo-Saxon principles of justice that we must forever be ashamed of that page in our history … The Nuremberg farce represents a revenge policy at its worst.”
And this farce was set in motion and carried out at the behest and with the unstinting support of “those whom you are not allowed to name”.
Two Jewish officers in the US Army, Lieutenant Colonel Murray Bernays and Colonel David Marcus played key roles.
As per historian Robert Conot, it was Bernays who was “the guiding spirit leading the way to Nuremberg.” Bernays, a New York attorney, persuaded US War Secretary Henry Stimson and others to accept the idea of putting the German leaders on trial.
Marcus was the chief of the US government’s War Crimes Branch in 1946/1947, and it was he who selected almost all of the judges, prosecutors and lawyers for the Nuremberg Trials. As a fervent Zionist he later became a commander of the “Haganah” military forces in Palestine. But, of course, that’s just a coincidence, nothing to worry about! There is no way that he would have allowed prejudice against the Germans to influence his decisions. Jews do not do such things! Perish the thought! This most ethical nation is only interested in justice!
Jewish organizations, while not officially involved in the proceedings, were nevertheless untiring in their hysterical propaganda efforts to keep the world’s and the tribunal’s focus on Jews and their alleged suffering.
Chief Prosecutor for the US, Robert H. Jackson, in his opening address to the Tribunal declared:
“The most savage and numerous crimes planned and committed by the Nazis were those against the Jews … It is my purpose to show a plan and design, to which all Nazis were fanatically committed, to annihilate all Jewish people…. The avowed purpose was the destruction of the Jewish people as a whole… The conspiracy or common plan to exterminate the Jews was … methodically and thoroughly pursued… History does not record a crime ever perpetrated against so many victims or one ever carried out with such calculated cruelty.”
The Jews, as ever, needed to take centre stage!
On Sept. 25, 1945, Tom Dodd, the second in command on the American prosecution team at Nuremberg, made the following observations:
“You know how I have despised anti-Semitism. You know how strongly I feel toward those who preach intolerance of any kind. With that knowledge — you will understand when I tell you that this staff is about seventy-five percent Jewish (emphasis mine BJW). Now my point is that the Jews should stay away from this trial — for their own sake. For — mark this well — the charge ‘a war for the Jews’ is still being made and in the post-war years it will be made again and again. The too large percentage of Jewish men and women here will be cited as proof of this charge. Sometimes it seems that the Jews will never learn about these things. They seem intent on bringing new difficulties down on their own heads. I do not like to write about this matter —it is distasteful to me — but I am disturbed about it. They are pushing and crowding and competing with each other and with everyone else.”
The Nuremberg Tribunal, in its Old -Testament-style thirst for revenge, knowingly and intentionally violated every single principle of justice. To mention just a few:
The Allies acted as prosecutor, judge and executioner
The charges were created ex post facto especially for the occasion
The charges were applied selectively, i.e. only to the vanquished Germans
Confessions were extracted under torture and defendants were blackmailed. Streicher was humiliated, viciously beaten, kicked, whipped and burned with cigarettes.
More cruelty was to follow! The hangings were deliberately bungled. The use of a short rope prevented what should have been instantaneous death from a broken neck but guaranteed slow and agonizing strangulation.
Stag Magazine, (Vol. 3, No. 1, December 1946), reported that Woods was a Jew. He boasted to the U.S. Army’s Stars and Stripes newspaper that he enjoyed the task, saying that “hanging those Nazis was the best thing I ever did.”
Streicher went to his death with courage and defiance and the words: “Purim – 1946!” He died after 14 minutes of slow strangulation. This is Jewish justice vis-a-vis Gentiles!
As every coin has two sides we now need to look at Jewish justice vis-a-vis members of the tribe.
An Associated Press article appearing on 12-9-1998 in several major papers stated:
“Warsaw – Israel has refused to extradite a Jew accused of atrocities against German prisoners in Poland after WWII, the Polish Justice Ministry said yesterday. Solomon Morel, who commanded the Swietochlowice camp for Germans in southern Poland from February to November 1945, allegedly tortured inmates and is considered responsible for at least 1,538 deaths. Israel refused Poland’s request for extradition, saying the statute of limitations had run out”.
For purposes of Jewish revenge statutes of limitations and such a trivial matter as proof or at least probable cause is irrelevant. But when a Jew commits crimes against Gentiles, Israel refuses to extradite! This is not an isolated case. Israel NEVER extradites, no matter how horrendous the crime. It is a principle of Talmudic law that Gentile courts have no jurisdiction over a Jew which makes Israel a perfect sanctuary for all sorts of criminals on the run, something that was foreseen by Hitler:
“….all they want is a central headquarters for their international world swindle, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the intervention of other states: a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university for budding crooks.”
(“Mein Kampf”, Volume I, Chapter 11, pp. 324-325 – HM edition)
In a three-year study done by Amnesty International the Israeli army’s use of force against Palestinians is described as “unnecessary, arbitrary and brutal”. In all cases examined there was no evidence that the Israeli soldiers’ lives were under threat. Self-defence is therefore ruled out and we are left with pre-meditated acts, ranging from malicious wounding to outright murder. Frequently, the victims are shot in the back while fleeing! More often than not the targets of the trigger-happy soldiers – proud members of the world’s self-proclaimed “most moral army” – are children.
An Israeli army statement said: “The IDF [Israeli Defense Forces] holds itself to the highest of professional standards and trains and equips itself as such. When there is any suspicion of wrong doing, or breach of discipline, the IDF reviews, investigates and takes action where appropriate.”
The action taken? In most cases no more than a slap on the wrist! Although the Palestinian victims of these psychopaths number in the thousands Amnesty International says it cannot identify a single case of a member of the Israeli security forces being convicted of “wilfully killing” a Palestinian in the occupied territories for the past 25 years.
According to Yesh Din, an Israeli human rights group, only four soldiers have been convicted of negligent manslaughter and another one of negligence in the past 13 years . None was discharged from the army or received a prison sentence of more than a few months.
We were born – each and everyone of us – free and sovereign human beings, endowed by God or if you prefer Nature, with inalienable rights and furthermore we are equal before the law. These rights are enshrined in and guaranteed by what is unarguably the world’s most advanced legal system, Anglo-Saxon jurisprudence.
You will find these rights in the Magna Carta 1215, in the Bill of Rights 1688, in the Habeas Corpus Act 1679.
Talmudic law on the other hand deems some people, the Jews, more equal than others! Even as a Jew you have very few rights. As a Gentile none! You are no more than the plaything of the rabbis, self-appointed makers and interpreters of Jewish law.
It is easy to understand why a Jew would prefer a Jewish court. But why would any sane and self-respecting Gentile man or woman put his trust in a Jewish court?
“There is no danger of that! I would never go to a Jewish court!” you may say. I have bad news for you. Modern courts in the Western world ARE Jewish courts in disguise! Our court system is in essence a lucrative monopoly run by Jews and their brown-nosing Freemason buddies! These two criminal elements have hijacked our law. They have stealthily and incrementally subverted, perverted and debased it!
And unless we take back what was stolen from us things can only get worse.
Why I don’t care for the Jews
Despite the fact that I maintain this website, host a radio program and write for a national newspaper, I really am a regular guy. I like to spend time with my family and friends, go hiking, hang out at the beach, lift weights, go jogging and biking, watch football, have a beer and everything else regular Americans like to do (for the most part).
I suppose I’ve always been somewhat of a free-thinker, and critical of the government and media to a certain extent. Things changed drastically once I began investigating the events of 9/11 – I quickly discovered that everything the government and media have told us about that monumental, world-changing event was and remains a total lie.
After a few months of investigating, I realized that the state of Israel and a wider international network of Jewish criminals controlling the mass media and United States government were responsible for planning, organizing, orchestrating and benefiting from 9/11. That’s when I truly discovered the reality of the age-old phenomenon often called the Jewish problem.
It’s not easy talking about the Jews, especially if you have negative and critical things to say about them and their agenda. I’ve decided to write this article in case I have to explain my views about the Jews to an average person I meet in public, which has actually happened quite often recently.
To be perfectly frank, I don’t particularly care for the Jews, and here’s why.
(I should note here that when I say “the Jews,” I am specifically referring to the organized Jewish community, not necessarily every single Jewish individual. Some of the biggest critics of Israel, Zionism, Jewish identity politics and even the Jewish religion are Jews themselves, such as Benjamin Freedman, Myron Fagan, Israel Shahak, Brother Nathanael Kapner and Gilad Atzmon.)
I don’t particularly care for the Jews because they are liars.
Through their control of the mass media and influence in academia and our educational establishment, the Jews have managed to deceive the entire world with their false, often entirely fabricated version of history and current events. Writing in Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler described the Jews as having an “unqualified capacity for falsehood,” and he was exactly right.
Just to underscore this crucial point, in the Gospel of John, 8:44, Jesus Christ addressed the people we know as Jews today, stating: “Ye are of [your] father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.”
The Jews would have you believe that they are benevolent bearers of “enlightenment,” “progress” and “tolerance,” while being innocent, blameless “victims” of irrational “anti-Semites” all throughout history, when in reality every time genuine anti-Jewish sentiment has reared its head in a public manner it has always been because of subversive, criminal Jewish behavior.
The Jews have been thrown out of over 100 countries over the course of history, not because people everywhere are mindless “anti-Semites” who irrationally persecute Jews, but because of Jewish behavior and actions.
The Jews basically lie about everything. They lie about Adolf Hitler and WWII, portraying him and National Socialist Germany as the epitome of evil, a “racist anti-Semitic” movement who wanted to “conquer the world for the Aryan race” and systematically murder the entire Jewish population in Europe. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Adolf Hitler and National Socialist Germany were the greatest threat to international Jewry’s global agenda of world domination, subjugation and exploitation – and the Jews know it.
Hitler simply wanted the Jews out of Europe, recognizing their corrupt, degenerate, parasitic existence in the heart of Western civilization. Once Hitler legally and democratically came to power, he attempted to rectify – through diplomatic means – the unjust provisions of the various “peace treaties” which officially ended WWI, particularly the Treaty of Versailles pertaining specifically to Germany. Hitler and the German people were subjected to ridicule, disrespect and contempt by the international community, especially the French, British and American political and media establishment. Hitler was focused primarily on ending unemployment in Germany, uplifting and revitalizing the Germany people and strengthening the German nation. The last thing he wanted was to fight another World War.
The entire official Jewish narrative of WWII is the exact opposite of what really happened during this critical period of time in our history. Hitler did not initiate WWII, the Jewish controlled Western democracies did; Hitler’s Germany and her allies did not “Holocaust” the Jews of Europe, the Allied nations committed genocide against the German people and their allies. Virtually all of the crimes the Jews and their puppets – the Americans, British and Soviets primarily – committed were projected onto the Germans through the Jewish control of the mass media, Hollywood and political establishment. The story of “6 million Jews” being “exterminated by the evil Nazis” is a totally fraudulent narrative that has been manufactured and perpetuated over the years by Jewish propagandists and their lackeys. Psychologically and emotionally exploitative propaganda has been effectively used to reinforce and reinstill the fake Jewish “Holocaust” narrative over the years, particularly in the West.
The Jews lie about 9/11 being organized and carried out by Osama bin Laden and “al-Qaeda”, when in reality the Jews planned, executed and have benefited from 9/11, and merely blamed it on bin Laden and “radical Muslim terrorists” in order to kick start the fraudulent, pre-planned “Global War on Terror” and to justify the tyrannical “Homeland Security” paradigm in America and the West.
The Jews lied about Iraq having “Weapons of Mass Destruction” and are lying about Iran attempting to acquire them. The entire “Global War on Terror” and threat of “international terrorism” is one big lie.
The Jews lie about vaccines being good and necessary for children, and a wide variety of other medical and health issues. I could go on and on here folks. Suffice it to say: the Jews lie about almost everything.
I don’t particularly care for the Jews because they are hypocrites. The Jews are easily the biggest hypocrites in the entire world. They openly organize, raise money and advocate for their own unique political, cultural and economic interests, often at the expense of everyone else. And yet they condemn anyone and everyone – especially White Christian peoples – for attempting to do the same exact thing.
The Jewish state of “Israel” – an illegitimate, fraudulent terrorist state occupying Palestine – is the home of the Jewish people. Non-Jews in Israel are discriminated against, persecuted and even deported on a regular basis. And yet the Jews are the biggest proponents of “diversity” and “multiculturalism” and massive non-White immigration into traditionally White Western European countries, including the United States, Canada, Australia and, of course, Europe. According to the Jews, there can be no White nations – that’s “racist” after all. White people that seek to protect their homelands, culture, racial identity and traditions are considered “backwards” and “racist” while the Jews openly organize and champion their own unique Jewish interests and have their own Jewish state. This is unacceptable.
Anyone even slightly criticizing the globalist, anti-White “multicultural” agenda which is seeking to displace and eliminate White people, White countries, White identity and White culture is somehow an “evil Nazi bigot” who “hates other people” and “wants to kill Six Million Jews.” We are forced to be “tolerant” and “respectful” of everything and everyone – homosexuals, transgendered individuals, sexual deviants and perverts, criminal illegal aliens, subversives and everything in between – except for White people who care about and want to preserve their homelands, heritage, culture and race.
The hypocrisy from the Jews is simply astounding and intolerable.
I don’t particularly care for the Jews because they are usurers, thieves and con artists. All throughout history, the Jews have been known as usurers and shady, corrupt businessmen. Usury is simply the loaning of money at interest to other individuals, businesses and governments, enslaving them through debt. The Jews have managed to essentially monopolize the practice of usury, and have institutionalized this practice on both a national and international scale.
The Federal Reserve System, which is nothing more than a consortium of private (largely Jewish owned and controlled) banks who have a monopoly on printing and loaning money to the United States government, was a creation of international bankers connected to the Rothschild banking dynasty in Britain and Europe. The central banks of Europe, Britain and elsewhere are all connected to this international system of usury, centered around not only the Federal Reserve, Bank of England and European Central Bank, but also the International Monetary Fund, World Bank and Bank for International Settlements.
The practice of usury is nothing more than the institutionalized defrauding and enslavement of entire nations. The international financial system dominating the global economy at this point is based on usury, exploitation, speculation and fraud. Everyone reading here no doubt experienced the 2008 financial collapse and aftermath. Wall Street banks and other international financial institutions essentially defrauded and robbed the entire world, and were rewarded, rather than arrested, with a massive bailout by the United States federal government for their criminal behavior.
Wall Street and other major international banking and financial institutions are dominated by Jews. Rather than actually working, producing a legitimate product that advances society, they exploit, cheat, defraud and steal from others. I have a problem with this.
I don’t particularly care for the Jews because they are treacherous and exploitative.
The Jewish holy book known as the Talmud specifically sanctions and encourages deceiving, lying to, exploiting, defrauding and even killing non-Jews. “Even the best of the Goyim (non-Jews) should be killed,” the filthy Talmud teaches Jews. That’s how bad it is folks. Go read about it.
Most people erroneously believe the Jews’ holy book is the Torah, or the Old Testament, when in reality the real holy book of the Jewish rabbis and the Jewish people is the Talmud, which is a commentary on and, truth be hold, systematic critique and subversion of the Old Testament and Mosaic law. The Jews are not the Israelites of the Bible, despite the modern day Jewish state occupying Palestine being called Israel.
The Jewish religion and culture encourages defrauding and stealing from non-Jews. The Jews are notorious for their ponzi schemes, espionage operations and commercial and industrial theft. Jewish spies have regularly been detected and arrested throughout history, even in the United States. Jonathan Pollard is a prime example.
Jewish spies and agents have repeatedly stolen American military and industrial technology, blackmailed major politicians and other leading figures in society (Remember the Monica Lewinsky affair? Yeah, she was Jewish and that entire operation was run by Jews), systematically advanced false and misleading information in the mass media in order to achieve certain geopolitical goals (Remember “Saddam Hussein’s Weapons of Mass Destruction”? All Jewish lies) and have otherwise engaged in treacherous, exploitative behavior. The Jews will stop at nothing to achieve their goals, no matter how ruthless they have to be.
The Jews are and have always been extremely treacherous and exploitative. Those of you who have had dealings with Jews know this fact perfectly well.
I don’t particularly care for the Jews because they are subverters, radicals and perverts.
“We Jews, we, the destroyers, will remain the destroyers for ever,” wrote Jewish author Maurice Samuels in his book You Gentiles. “Nothing that you will do will meet our needs and demands. We will for ever destroy…”
Marcus Eli Ravage, yet another Jewish author, wrote in the January 1928 issue of Century Magazine: “You have not begun to appreciate the real depth of our guilt. We are intruders. We are disturbers. We are subverters. We have taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny, and played havoc with them.” The Jews have always been the leading radicals, subversives and revolutionaries throughout history. Communism, feminism, “gender equality”, homosexual rights, transgender rights, sexual deviancy, pornography and sexual promiscuity – Jews have led and championed all of these movements and efforts all throughout history, even to this very day.
The Jews absolutely hate traditional Western civilization, and have worked overtime to critique, subvert, debase and ultimately destroy our civilization and traditions. The Jews have poisoned our minds with subversive, degenerate ideas, and have normalized debauched, grotesque behaviors and lifestyles, including homosexuality, sexual licentiousness, miscegenation and other perverted, destructive practices.
Turn on the television today and you will see how far we have fallen.
I don’t particularly like the Jews because they dominate and control the American government, media, banking system, and other major aspects of our society.
The organized Jewish community, through its various lobbies, non-profit organizations, museums, charities and other institutions, essentially controls the Western political establishment. The United States Congress, White House and Supreme Court are dominated by Jews and non-Jewish puppets of the Jews. It’s truly shameful how subservient the American government, political establishment and “elite society” is to Israel and the Jewish community. On a daily basis, American politicians literally commit treason against their own country – right in the face of the American public.
Jews themselves openly admit and boast about their ownership and control of the mass media and Hollywood. Joel Stein, a Jewish journalist, wrote an article in the Los Angeles Times back in December of 2008 entitled, “Who runs Hollwood? C’mon,” where he jokes about the alleged “anti-Semitic” canard that “Jews control Hollywood” and openly states: “Jews totally run Hollywood.” To conclude his essay, he writes that he doesn’t “care if Americans think we’re [Jews] running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government,” he only cares “that we [Jews] get to keep running them.”
The Times of Israel, a popular online Israeli news outlet, published a blog post back in 2012 provocatively entitled, “Jews DO control the media”.
So much for the “anti-Semitic” canard or “conspiracy theory” about Jews owning and controlling the mass media and Hollywood – they openly admit and boast about it in their own newspapers!
As previously mentioned, the Jewish control of Wall Street, the Federal Reserve and other major international financial and banking institutions is a well known fact at this point.
There are two really good websites pointing these facts out that I would highly recommend checking out. A website called JewishFaces.com thoroughly documents the Jewish dominance of the American government, politics, banking, media and other aspects of society. Also, be sure to visit Who Controls America? at thezog.wordpress.com for more documentation of the Jewish dominance of America.
The total Jewish control of America is truly mind boggling.
The Jews have subverted America, and are well on their way to entirely wrecking the place. And most people sit around in total ignorance as to what is really going on. Or, even worse, they’re too afraid to say or do anything about it.
That’s why I don’t particularly care for the Jews.
Did Little Moshe Really Die Six Times Before He Survived?
On April 27, 1995, the elite of German society, wearing Jewish mourning hats, gathered together in Belsen to mourn, weep and wail. These politically correct elite stood shoulder to shoulder with their Jewish holocaust-comrades in an affected display of unity to the world, whilst the entire world media captured these tender moments for posterity. The act of caring, worthy of a Holowood-Oscar, was to mourn the “mass gassings” in the former Belsen “extermination” camp. However, Belsen had no gas chambers and was far from being an extermination camp. Belsen was a camp for prominent, influential Jews for future exchange. But no matter, this is not important, for the SHOA must go on.
Please read on and learn what Belsen was all about. Please read also the story of little Moshe whose Belsen gas chamber ordeal lasted SIX rounds before he survived:
Belsen had no gas chambers:
|Jewish Chronicle, London||Friday, November 6, 1998|
IF ONE WERE to choose one word guaranteed, for the British, to encapsulate the horrors of the Holocaust, it would be “Belsen.” … So, it was the newsreels of the liberation of Belsen that brought home to the British public the existence of gas chambers and the Nazi extermination camps and the reality of Hitler’s “Final Solution.” … Belsen had no gas chambers and was not an extermination camp …
If anything, it had been one of the less brutalised camps, since one of its purposes had been to hold some prominent Jews for exchange with interned Germans.
It was only as the flood of inmates from camps in Poland poured into Belsen in the last months of the war that it took on its familiar, hellish character … Nor was Belsen linked at the time with the specifically Jewish tragedy, despite the fact that Jews were the majority of the inmates at the liberation.
But little Moshe was gassed SIX times at Belsen before he survived!
The Monteal Gazette – August 5, 1993
|Surviving the horror
Author recounts experiences in Nazi concentration camp
ST. LAURENT – As an 11 year-old boy held captive at the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp during World War II, Moshe Peer was sent to the gas chamber at least six times. Each time he survived, watching with horrors as many of the women and children gassed with him collapsed and died. To this day, Peer doesn’t know how he was able to survive. “Maybe children resist better, I don’t know,” he said in an interview last week.
Now 60, Peer has spent the last 19 years writing a first-person account of the horror he witnessed at Bergen Belsen. On Sunday, he spoke to about 300 young adults at the Petah Tikva Sephardic Congregation in St. Laurent about his book and his experience as a Holocaust survivor.
The gathering was part of the synagogue’s Shabbaton 93, which brought together young adults from across North America for a cultural and social experience.
Called Inoubliable Bergen-Belsen (Unforgettable Bergen-Belsen), Peer wrote the book to make the reader feel like a witness at the scene. But he admits he can never recreate for anyone the living hell he experienced. “The conditions in the camp is indescribable,” Peer said. “You can’t bring home the horror.”
In 1942, at age 9, Peer and his younger brother and sister were arrested by police in their homeland of France. His mother was sent to Auschwitz and never returned.
Peer and his siblings were sent to Bergen-Belsen two years later. He recalls the separation from his parents as excruciating. But surviving the horrors of the camp quickly became a priority.
“There were pieces of corpses lying around and there were bodies lying there, some alive and some dead,” Peer recalled.
“Bergen-Belsen was worse than Auschwitz because there people were gassed right away so they didn’t suffer a long time.”
Peer said Russian prisoners were kept in an open-air camp “like stallions” and were given no food or water. “Some people went mad with hunger and turned to cannibalism,” Peer said.
Peer’s day began with a roll call of the numbered prisoners. This could last as long as five hours, while their captors calculated how many prisoners had died. Anyone who fell over during the roll call was beaten on the spot.
After roll call, the prisoners returned to their barracks, where they were given a tiny piece of bread and some coloured water.
Peer and his siblings – who all survived – were cared for at the camp by two women, whom Peer has unsuccessful tried to find.
Children being children, they did play, sometimes chasing each other around the barracks. But there would always be some who were too sick or weak to get up.
After the war, Peer was reunited with his father in Paris and the family moved to Israel. Peer’s four children were born in Israel, but after serving in the Israeli army in a number of wars, Peer moved to Montreal in 1974.
Even 49 years later, Peer is still haunted by his concentration-camp experience and still finds his memories keep him awake at night.
But what he is most bitter about is the way the rest of world stood by and let it happen.
“No one told the Germans not to do it. They had the permission of world,” he said.
There is a tiny beauty spot on little Moshe’s survivor story. According to the latest Holocaust revelations, Belsen had no gas chambers. It was far from being an extermination camp but a camp for prominent, influential Jews for future exchange, therefore treatment was accorded them. But don’t worry, little Moshe, the Germans still believe your Zyklon B six-pack-story – they must believe you, by law, you know!
Gassed Six Times
Nobody can deny that Jews have suffered hardship in the course of their history – but so have others! Many others! While a Jew will happily agree with the first part of the above statement he will not want to hear about the second part! The suffering of others is nothing to do with him!
Millions all over the world have watched “Swindler’s List”, sorry “Schindler’s List”. Millions have read the concocted diary of Anne Frank and other “victims”. The holocaust industry keeps on churning out movies, TV dramas, lachrymose memoirs, non-fiction books with the most ridiculous claims and there is even a beauty pageant of Holocaust survivors! What obscenity!
But when did you last watch a blockbuster Hollywood production about the Dresden fire-bombing that killed hundreds of thousands of people who had sought refuge in a city they considered safe as it was of no value to the German war effort and therefore of no strategic value to the Allies? Most were women, children and old people; they were burned alive!
When did you last watch a documentary on TV about the Bolshevik murder of millions of Christian Russians for no reason other than that they were Christians? When did you last read a book about the Bolshevik-engineered Ukrainian famine that killed an estimated 7 to 8 million people? And here it is important to remember that the Bolshevik perpetrators were, almost to a man, Jews, part-Jews or crypto-Jews!
Have you ever heard of Gypsies making the kind of outrageous demands, mostly for money, that Jews constantly come up with? Or blaming everybody – including the Pope – for not coming to their aid ?
Most of the massacres and mass murders that occurred throughout history have either been completely forgotten – or swept aside to make room for the one and only “holocaust” – ironically, the only one that actually never happened!
There is no shortage of material concerning man’s inhumanity! Let’s have a look at some examples:
Black Americans have suffered slavery and segregation. Native Americans had their land stolen from them and were nearly driven to extinction as also happened to the Aborigines in Australia. The Irish were the plaything of the English through the centuries. The ah-so-noble British invented the concentration camp and interned Boer women and children to force the men to surrender to the invading British.
Millions of German POWs died in camps run by the Allies from intentional starvation, lack of medical attention and exposure to the elements in the open-air concentration camps. Millions of German civilians perished during the ethnic cleansing and expulsion from their homeland, carried out by the Poles, Czechs, Hungarians and Russians.
Civilians in Hiroshima and Nagasaki were incinerated with atomic bombs, even after! the Japanese had already offered to surrender.
Not all that long ago the Pol Pot regime in Cambodia killed millions of Cambodians, mostly the educated class!
Then we have the genocide of Armenians and now the ethnic cleansing of Palestine. Let’s not forget the death of Iraqi children caused by starvation and lack of medical care, courtesy of the blockade imposed in the lead-up to the Iraq war by the white knights in shining armor in Washington and London.
This sickening list could go on and on and on.
It is saddening to realize that these shameful episodes are usually forgotten after a few years or at most a few decades. It is right that we should remember the suffering of others as well as our own! Don’t we owe all these victims their own Museums?
No, that would never do as it would take attention away from the specialness of our glorious Chosenites! It would make it plain as day that they are just one nation amongst many others.
But the Jewish holocaust and Jewish suffering are indeed – as Jews claim – unique, although not in the way they would have you believe!
First: all of the massacres of non-Jews mentioned above are fully documented and were fully intentional. On the other hand there is NO evidence that six million Jews died and there is NO evidence that any deaths that did occur were intentional!
Second: there is something terribly wrong with the Jewish way of remembering! How so?
In his deluded mind:
The Jew is the ONLY ONE who ever suffered! His egomania is such that the hardship of others does not even register with him; he literally believes that his own suffering is so unique and so important to the world that just to mention the suffering of others means that, somehow, his suffering is belittled!
The fact is: by proclaiming the uniqueness of his suffering he is the one who belittles everybody else’s suffering!
In his deluded mind:
He ALWAYS exaggerates his suffering shamelessly or just plain fabricates it! He is not even bright enough to stay away from inventing the most absurd fairy tales that even a child could see through.
During the Bar Kochba revolt against the Romans about 40 million Jews were killed by the Romans! Yes, really! Cross my heart and hope to die! The Germans did not just stop at killing Jews, no! they turned them into soap and lampshades! Inventing such horror stories comes easy to him.
And while everybody is distracted by horror stories about non-existant German gas chambers he is publicly and vociferously clamouring for some real atrocities:
This kind of Jewish atrocity propaganda is not a recent thing at all; it goes back a long way and is intended to create both hatred and fear of the Gentile nations as tools to glue the tribe together and drive a wedge between Jews and the rest of mankind. We are also dealing here with the well-known propensity of the psychopath to project his own inner world on others, accusing them systematically of the very same crimes that he is committing himself or at least fantasises about.
The Talmud has such gems as the following claims which demonstrate the Jewish mentality: Gittin 57b claims that four billion Jews were killed by the Romans in the city of Bethar. There weren’t that many people – let alone Jews – alive at that time! This claim is absurd even if we grant the possibility that somebody confused the numbers and actually only meant to claim 4 million. Gittin 58a claims that 16 million Jewish children were wrapped in scrolls and burned alive by the Romans.
In his deluded mind:
He KEEPS SCORE!!! He has turned his “victimhood” into an art form and made persecution his badge of honour which, as I have noticed on many occasions, he wears proudly! He considers himself justified in nursing resentment and grudges in perpetuity and to inflict revenge for every wrong, real or imagined, ever done to him – revenge not only on the perpetrators but on their children and children’s children unto the umpteenth generation! A victory over an enemy is riotously celebrated as is done every year on Purim. Mind you, that was 2500 years ago! – yet he has not forgotten his enemy, no matter how long gone. He still fans the flames of anger and hatred.
He will never tire of telling everybody just how much he has suffered and to make sure that we all know and never ever forget he will rig the curriculum of schools and introduce his mandatory “Holocaust Studies” in order to indoctrinate the next generation of Gentiles.
But worst of all!
He is INSANE enough to claim the moral high ground, IMPUDENT enough to present himself as the pinnacle of humanity. He is automatically innocent and automatically above any suspicion of wrong-doing. You have no business to ask him questions! That alone proves that you wish him ill!
He has the chutzpah to peddle Judaism, tribalism in its ugliest form, as the most ethical of the world’s religions. This arrogant assertion is contradicted by his own “Holy Books”, the Torah and the Talmud, which are no more than instruction manuals for genocidal racism and other criminal activities and, more importantly, it is flatly contradicted by his own egregious conduct!
Of course, he is incapable of seeing himself the way that others see him! That requires something he does not have: a certain level of maturity, intelligence and the ability to engage in self-reflection! No, he has never wronged and never harmed anybody. No, he has never persecuted any other ethnic, national or religious group. He, through absolutely no fault of his own, has been exiled not only from his own country, Judea (after the Romans finally had enough of him) but from many of the countries that kindly offered him sanctuary and whose people he promptly exploited, abused and betrayed. No, it wasn’t him that opened the gates of Constantinople to let the Turks in!
It was and is the evil Jew-hating Gentile that did and does all these nasty things and then blames them on the innocent Jew! Always and everywhere! So there! Now you know the truth!
It wasn’t him who enriched himself while ruining entire nations with his usury, thus earning himself yet another expulsion (well, as long as he can take the loot away with him that does not bother him too much!).
It wasn’t him who instigated one revolution and one war after another. The Bolshevik Revolution, one of the world’s most murderous episodes, had nothing to do with the fact that Jew Trotsky and half-Jew Lenin (some believe he was fully Jewish) were in the pockets of America’s Jewish banksters. Perish the thought! It was the uprising of the long-suppressed Russian peasants and workers. Exactly!
In the magazine Israel of April 2003, published in France, we read the following words written by a certain André Darmon:
“To kill a Jew or a child makes God cry, for we are exterminating [in the Jew] the bearer of universal ethics and innocence.”
There you have it! That’s how special he is!
I do not presume to know the mind of God but I can believe that God DOES weep when a child is killed – no argument there. Does he also weep when a Yid is killed? Possible, I suppose, but I am inclined to doubt it! What is there to mourn?
The Case Against the Jews:
By John “Birdman” Bryant
1. Opening Quotations
The question is not whether I am antisemitic. The question is only whether I am right. –JBR Yant, Mortal Words v 8
America needs more Holocaust museums. But instead of museums depicting false atrocities perpetrated against Jews, it needs museums depicting the real atrocities perpetrated by Jews. –JBR Yant, Mortal Words v 8
In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish effort rise the schemes of the International Jews. … This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany) and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs [Nesta] Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognisable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire. –Winston Churchill, “Bolshevism, A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People”, London Illustrated Herald, 8 Feb 1920
The governments of the peoples included in this world republic, with the aid of the victorious proletariat, all will fall without difficulty into Jewish hands. Private property will then be strangled by the Jewish directors, who will administer the state patrimony everywhere. Thus the promise of the Talmud will be fulfilled, that is, the promise that the Jews, at the arrival of the Messiah, will possess the key to the wealth of all the peoples of the earth. –Baruch Levy, in a letter to Karl Marx, published in the Rothschild-controlled La Revue de Paris, 1 June 1928
You have not begun to appreciate the depth of our guilt. We are intruders. We are subverters. We have taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny, and played havoc with them. We have been at the bottom of not only the latest great war, but of every other major revolution in your history. We have brought discord and confusion and frustration into your personal and public life. We are still doing it. No one can tell how long we shall go on doing it. Who knows what great and glorious destiny might have been yours if we had left you alone. –Marcus Eli Ravage, Jewish writer, Century Magazine, Feb 1928
The world revolution which we will experience will be exclusively our affair and will rest in our hands. This revolution will tighten the Jewish domination over all other people. –Le Peuple Juif, 8 Feb 1919
The Second World War is being fought for the defense of the fundamentals of Judaism. –Chicago Jewish Sentinel, 8 Oct 1942
We intend to remake the Gentiles by doing what the communists are doing in Russia. –Rabbi Lewis Browne in his book How Odd of God
We must hate. Hate is the essence of communism. –Vladimir Lenin
The essay which follows was sent to a highly-intelligent friend of long standing. He refused to read it, saying only that he was “content to remain ignorant of that topic [Jews], as on 99% of the things in this world”, in spite of conceding that “tho of course it must contain much truth”. Unfortunately, there is nothing at all unusual in my friend’s behavior. It is what I call the HITS (Head-In-The-Sand) reaction — the hope that all will be well if the problem at issue can just manage to be ignored. And it is to be conceded that this approach sometimes works — my friend is getting on in years, and he may well end up as food for worms before the Jewish Question — ie, the question of what dangers are posed by Jews to America and to Western (gentile) civilization generally, if any — ever substantively arises in his life. For those of us without one foot in the grave, however, the ugly fact is that the Jewish Question is one of the most important issues of the day, and it is precisely this fact which the present essay seeks to demonstrate. The Jewish Question is important, however, in a way in which other vital problems are not, because of the Great Taboo on even discussing it. In fact, the Jewish Question has become a sort of a benchmark of intellectual freedom: Whenever there is an inability to fully and freely discuss this issue, intellectual freedom has been severely compromised.
Now most people don’t give a tinker’s damn about intellectual freedom, which is hardly surprising since most people don’t have much of an intellect to be free with — after all, half the population — and 85% of blacks — have an IQ below 100. But even for most of the more cerebral types, intellectual freedom doesn’t usually mean much because their minds are so fossilized with conventional ideas that the chance of a new one finding an entree is about as likely as the chance of finding a negro competent in brain surgery. For the small remainder of us, however, intellectual freedom is almost as vital as breathing. For us, truth is the goal, no matter whose ox gets gored, whose ass gets kicked, or whose sacred cow gets turned into shishkebob. Truth-seeking, it is to be admitted, can be a risky business — the history of mankind is littered with the corpses of dissenters and heretics, and there is only the thin blue line of civilization which stands between the truth-seeker and the barbarity of most other men.
Lest I be misunderstood, I do not wish to excessively denigrate those who are unwilling to break the Great Taboo — it is simply too frightening for most men to risk jobs or social disapproval over an issue which seems so far removed from their everyday concerns. Nor, for that matter, do I wish to excessively denigrate those who break the Great Taboo out of hatred, even tho I am not one to share that hate: It takes guts to break a taboo, and when all the pasty-faced intellectuals have run for cover, the only ones left to join in battle are those who think with their abdominal structures. And make no mistake: The usual epithets applied to those who break the Great Taboo — “hater”, “bigot”, “antisemite” and the like — are powerful anathemas which only the strong can endure, in spite of the fact that those who hurl such epithets are usually far better described as bigots and haters than those whom they seek to harm.
Besides the issue of intellectual freedom, the importance of the Jewish Question is significantly similar to intellectual conundrums like the Paradox of Irrelevant Information, which I have recently spent much time discussing with a gaggle of Mensans and other high-IQ types. This importance is due to the fact that the investigations of both the Jewish Question and intellectual conundrums such as the PII represent explorations at the frontier of man’s capacities — an intellectual frontier in the case of the intellectual conundrums, and an emotional and social frontier in the case of the Jewish Question. Explorations at such frontiers often demonstrate interesting and unanticipated things, and offer the possibility of opening up entirely new vistas and perspectives. But at the very least such explorations separate the scientific from the sciolistic, and the rational from the rationalizers.
The tragedy of those who, like my friend, are comfortable with the HITS posture, is that they will never have the chance to evaluate material which — even if only partially true — implies quite simply that we are all immersed in an ocean of lies which significantly skew our perspective and leave us out of touch in a major way with what is really happening in the world. And while in some sense the effect of the present essay will be to unmask the hidden activity of organized Jewry, in a more important sense the effect will be to unmask the extent of our own sordid and egregious ignorance.
You can run from this essay, but you cannot run from the truth it represents — you can only hope, like my friend, that it does not catch up with you.
3. The Essay: J’Accuse!
Note: One of the most famous cases of antisemitism (tho it was not actually antisemitism, according to Oliver (1981), but was made to seem so as a pretext for an attack on French culture by social revolutionaries) was the so-called Dreyfus affair which occurred in the latter part of the 19th century in France. Capt Dreyfus, a Jew and member of the French General Staff, was wrongly accused of crimes by fellow officers allegedly jealous of his success. The writer Emile Zola made the case a cause celebre by publicly defending Dreyfus with a series of articles entitled “J’Accuse!” (“I accuse”). If the reader detects a bit of table-turning here, he may be right.
Jews and gentiles have been in a state of conflict for the last 2000 years — an understandable if unfortunate circumstance, since brothers in religion or other ideology, like brothers in a family, have a more intense rivalry among themselves than they do with others more alien. But if religion provided the basis for most of the Jew-gentile conflict in historical times, it no longer does so, if for no other reason than that religion has simply ceased to play a major role in a society in which only a century ago it was the dominant force. Instead, the Jew-gentile conflict — the “Jewish Question” as it is sometimes termed — has now become a problem of the overweening influence if not virtual dominance by Jews of gentile institutions and culture. In the sense of the evolutionary struggle for “survival of the fittest” there is nothing obviously wrong with such a conflict; but when the details of this conflict are given a careful inspection, there seems to be a great deal which is wrong. The purpose of the present essay is to make just such an inspection; but rather than attempting to present detailed research (which would require at least a book) I have chosen rather to highlight a number of major points in a rather summary — but I believe revealing — fashion. While I have provided documentation for many of my assertions, as well as an extensive bibliography where a great deal more information along these lines may be found, the assertions of this essay will still be difficult for many to believe because the material is generally terra incognito to most people, including well-educated ones. The reason for this, of course, is that — as mentioned earlier — there is no greater taboo in American society (and for that matter, Western society) than the criticism of Jews, with the result that there is not only a profound ignorance concerning the Jewish Question, but a profound unwillingness to believe that there could possibly be anything worthwhile to learn. While I obviously cannot pry open those minds which are closed on this subject, for those individuals with at least a rudimentary curiosity I hope I will at minimum stimulate a desire to verify or refute the assertions of this essay. In my view there is simply no issue more important to Americans or white men generally than the Jewish Question, as those who dare to read this essay will shortly understand. I hasten to add, however, that there are no easy answers to the problems which are raised here, and those who believe differently have simply failed to grasp the complexity of the issues.
While Jews and their critics are often in disagreement, there is one point on which many on both sides agree, to wit, that Jews and gentiles should live separately because of their mutual incompatibility. This, it may be noted, was the theory behind the ghetto of historic times, which was sometimes imposed on Jews, but often embraced by them. And it was the theory advanced by the original Zionists, who saw Jew-gentile incompatibility as the principal wellspring of antisemitism and sought to solve the problem by creating a Jewish homeland.
While I am not an adherent of the incompatibility theory, an objective consideration of the facts demonstrate that a strong case can be made for it, particularly from the gentile side. Or to put it slightly differently, it may be said that gentiles have some very good reasons for being unhappy with Jewish behavior. I should hasten to add, however, that this is not to argue that such behavior cannot in some wise be “justified”, since the conflict between Jew and gentile is a very ancient one, and thus — much as in the famous feud of the Hatfields and McCoys — to say what is “justified” or not in such a conflict is probably quite impossible. But “justified” or not, and ill-intended or not, the question remains as to whether or not Jewish behavior is so contrary to gentile interests as to be intolerable to them. The remainder of this essay is devoted to outlining some major aspects of this behavior. These are discussed in the starred paragraphs below:
* Communism was an essentially Jewish phenomenon. Not merely did the Jew Karl Marx develop the ideas, but the founders of the seminal Russian variety were practically all Jews (this is amply documented by Britton (nd)), as were most of the major figures in communism everywhere in the West. Furthermore, the Russian revolution was financed primarily by Jewish bankers in New York, and specifically by Kuhn Loeb & Co, one of whose partners, Jacob Schiff, was said by his son to have spent the then- inconceivable-sum of $20 million for this purpose (see Sutton (1974)). Schiff was apparently acting out of enmity to the tsar, an antisemite, whom he had also attempted to overthrow by financing the Japanese in the Russo- Japanese war of 1906; and from this it is no surprise that the very first law passed by the Bolsheviks when they took power was a law against “antisemitism”. Bolshevism was responsible for more than 50 million deaths, many of them caused by the most fiendish tortures. Worldwide, Jewish-inspired communism has been responsible for the deaths of more than 100 million people. “Jewish bolshevism”, as it was frequently called in its early days, came close to achieving world hegemony, and — in its more subtle forms of liberalism and socialism — may still do so.
* Most Jews are liberals, and Jews have been prime movers in all of the major liberal social phenomena in America (Dershowitz (1997: 269), MacDonald (1998)). For example, Jews were founders of the NAACP and have served almost continuously as its principal directors and legal counsel; Jews founded and dominate the ACLU; most of the major feminists have been Jewish women (eg, Betty Friedan, Gloria Steinem); the civil rights movement — including SNCC and Martin Luther King — was dominated by Jews and/or communists; Jews comprise more than 50% of all appointed positions in the flamingly-liberal Clinton administration; Jewish senators and representatives have been the major forces behind gun control legislation (Schumer, Metzenbaum, Feinstein, etc), and so on virtually ad infinitum. What goes unstated in all this Jewish liberal activity, however, is that, as early as the late 1920s the (Jewish) leaders of international communism seized on the race issue as a means of tearing apart the world center of individual liberty — and thus their mortal enemy — America; and the subsequent Jewish/communist promotion of “civil rights” — a notion which has now spilled over into feminism, gay rights, children’s rights and all sorts of other Balkanization schemes to set groups against one another — has been so successful that many Americans are now talking openly of racial warfare and the breakup of the country.
* The Jewish role in South Africa is notable, and contains a chilling lesson for the societies of the West where the liberal/Jewish establishment is promoting immigration and exalting the multicult. During the apartheid era, South Africa was wealthy and flourishing — unlike black Africa, which was backward and poor — and as a result, blacks poured into South Africa seeking economic opportunity (so much for the ‘horrors’ of apartheid). But, with the success of ‘civil rights’ in America, liberals and their Jewish masters took up the anti-apartheid ’cause’, the major effect of which was — by means of boycotts and other forms of economic pressure — to cause a near-collapse of the South African economy (so much for the principle of self-determination), and was the major reason why South African whites committed cultural suicide at the ballot box by voting in one-man-one-vote ‘democracy’. But it was not just the effects of a Jewish- dominated liberal crusade against apartheid which put South Africa six feet under: The African National Congress, whose political agitation, murder and brutality was a major problem for the white-dominated South African government, was a communist terrorist organization, and the communist party in South Africa was headed by Joe Slovo, an immigrant Jew and intimate of communist terrorist Nelson Mandela.
Since the arrival of ‘democracy’, South Africa has virtually collapsed into a state of chaos: Corruption is rampant (overseen by a police force in which corruption is now the norm), utilities and other government services are virtually nonexistent, white areas have been turned into fortresses, the once-beautiful city of Johannesburg has become the rape capital of the world, one in every three South African white women are now victims of rape by blacks, farmers and their families are killed on a regular basis by marauding blacks, and things are so dangerous that it is common for cars to be equipped with devices which can spray fire on anyone who tries to gain access to a car without the driver’s permission.
But the Jewish role in the destabilization of white South Africa goes back at least to the Boer War, which was instigated over South African minerals, and which resulted in Jewish domination of South African mineral industries. As put by H. H. Beamish in a speech given October 30, 1937 in New York,
“The Boer War occurred 37 years ago. Boer means farmer. Many criticized a great power like Britain for trying to wipe out the Boers. Upon making inquiry, I found all the gold and diamond mines of South Africa were owned by Jews; that Rothschild controlled gold; Samuels controlled silver, Baum controlled other mining, and Moses controlled base metals.”
It has become a cliche, but only because it is so true: Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. And, I might add, regret it.
* Jews were responsible for getting the US to enter WWI on the side of Britain, which they did in exchange for the promise of a “Jewish homeland” in Palestine, which Britain then controlled. This promise was rendered in the form of the Balfour Declaration of 1917, supposedly written by British Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour to the chief representative of the Jewish community in Britain and head of the famous banking family, Lord Rothschild, but actually written collectively by major Jewish world leaders. (It may be noted that the interest in Palestine of Lord Rothschild and the other Zionists was not purely nationalistic; for a report prepared for Lord Rothschild in 1917 estimated the value of potash and other minerals in Palestine’s Dead Sea to be in the order of “several thousand billion dollars” (John (1997): 10).) Beyond this, the Jews may have had a hand in actually beginning WWI, inasmuch as the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand of Austria, which set off the war, was carried out by men which two sources I am now unable to locate claimed were Jews, but in any event were members of the Freemasons, an organization which “has long been linked to international political manipulation, and has been alleged to be the conduit for the intentions of a number of elitist interests, including the (Jewish) House of Rothschild and their international banking connections.” (Keith (1999): 30)
* Jews played a crucial role in getting the US involved in WWII. For one thing, the treaty of Versailles was heavily influenced by the Jewish advisors of the major participants at the conference (Wilson, Clemenceau and Lloyd George); and because the treaty was so abusive to Germany, many historians believe that this treaty made WWII a virtual certainty. Just as important as Versailles, however, was the attempted takeover of Germany after WWI by Soviet-financed Jews (the best known are Kurt Eisner and Rosa Luxemburg), whose social disruptions, violence and mass murder during the 1918-19 period left a lasting impression on a young soldier named Adolf Hitler (Barnes Review, March 95: 25-8). Another Jewish connection to the cause of WWII is our Jewish-descended president, Franklin Roosevelt (whose name is derived from the earlier family name Rosenveldt), along with his advisors (52 of 72 were Jews (Marshalko (1958): 236)), who was itching to get into the war, with the result that he placed extraordinary economic pressure on Japan in hopes that it would attack the US, which it did. Beyond this, when Hitler came to power in 1933, the world Jewish community under the direction of Samuel Untermeyer declared war on Germany by means of a worldwide economic boycott, an event which transpired a full six years before any military aggression by Hitler (After such a declaration, as Carl Hottelet (Barnes Review, Dec 94: 23) has pointed out, is it any wonder why German Jews ended up in concentration camps?) While the ostensible motive for this boycott was Hitler’s antisemitism, it has been alleged that the real momentum of the boycott — and the war that followed — was Hitler’s use of barter in international trade, something necessitated because Germany had no gold (it had been taken as reparations under the Versailles treaty), but an act which infuriated the world’s (largely-Jewish) banking elite because it bypassed the need for bankers’ gold (and thus the need for paying the bankers interest) with the result that Germany rapidly became economically prosperous.
* While Jewish scientists were prominent in developing the atomic bomb, some of these scientists (particularly the communist-associated J Robert Oppenheimer) along with other Jews — eg, Martin Sobell, Harry Gold, Theodore Hall, Klaus Fuchs and Julius & Ethel Rosenberg — were responsible for passing on American atomic secrets to the Soviets (Lorden (1997): 9). This, however, was only the beginning, for Jewish spying has been such a continuing problem — witness, for example, the Jonathan Pollard case — as to cause the recent release of a widely-reported official statement from the Pentagon (soon afterward hushed up) concerning the untrustworthiness of Jewish scientists and technicians in handling classified information. In fact, the CIA identified Israel to the Senate Intelligence Committee as “one of six foreign countries with a government-directed or -orchestrated clandestine effort to collect US economic intelligence” (Mann (1997). Beyond this, Israel has aggrandized itself by selling secret American technology — given to it as America’s “ally” — to China and other unauthorized governments. And yet, at this writing, the chairman of the National Security Council, which oversees all national security matters, is Sandy Berger, a Jew.
* In spite of the tension between nazi Germany and the Jews, Jewish organizations and the nazi government actually cooperated with one another in helping Jews immigrate to Palestine under the Ha’avara, or Transfer Agreement of May 1933. Specifically, Germany allowed the setting up of camps on German soil for the training of Jews in agricultural and other skills needed for emigration, and what is now the Israeli flag was the only national symbol besides the hakenkruz which was allowed to fly within the German Reich. More than this, many articles appeared in the German press praising Zionism, and Propaganda Minister Dr Joseph Goebbels even commissioned a special medallion commemorating Zionism (Nevers (1997): 9). The nazi-Zionist collaboration was so close that one of the Jewish underground military organizations in Palestine (the Irgun), whose leader, Menachem Begin, later became Prime Minister of Israel, actually made a formal proposal to the nazi government to fight on the side of Germany in exchange for German cooperation in forcing German Jews to immigrate to Palestine.
* What I have called the “Orthodox Jewish Version” of the Holocaust (OJV) was set in legal and historical cement at the Nuremberg trials after WWII. These trials were not a legal proceeding, but an act of Jewish revenge in which a large majority of the participants on the American side were Jews, in which the Germans on trial were treated with great brutality and often tortured (dozens had their testicles crushed, for example) in order to obtain “confessions”, in which lies which persist to the present day were presented as evidence-supported “truth”, and which was so inescapably Jewish that the death sentences of the defendants were carried out on the great annual celebration day of Jewish revenge, Purim (16 Oct 1946). In particular, the Nuremberg trials put the official seal of approval on the greatest of Jewish Big Lies, the Holocaust “genocide” (While it is commonly believed that Hitler developed the “Big Lie” technique, what he actually did (in Mein Kampf) was to accuse the Jews of using it). Not only has there never been any good evidence for nazi genocide (tho there was mass killing on the Eastern Front for reasons other than genocide), but the (in)famous story of the “six million” Jews supposedly killed by the nazis was in fact an anti-German propaganda story originating in the First World War (The “six million” story was actually impossible, because there were not even six million Jews in Europe during the WWII period. The true number of Jews who died in the camps — most from typhus and other diseases — has now been shown from the complete file of the German concentration camp system recently released from the former Soviet Archives to have been approximately 400,000 (Douglas (1997): 28). As to the notorious “gas chambers”, the story was not only another case of wartime propaganda, but was actually a reversal of what actually happened: At all concentration camps there were “gas chambers” in which cyanide gas was used to decontaminate the clothing of new inmates which often contained lice, these insects being the principal vector of typhus which was the major killer in the camps. Or to put it another way, the camps’ “gas chambers” were actually intended to save Jewish lives. The Holocaust lies continue to crumble in the face of revisionist scholarship — the story of soap made from Jewish fat and lampshades made from Jewish skin have been acknowledged as fabrications, for example, tho there are still occasional stories in the media of Jews holding burial ceremonies for ancient bars of soap; and even the fabled “six million” Jewish deaths has now officially (if indirectly) been acknowledged as false, since — with the publication by Israel’s Yad Vashem Holocaust Museum of Franciszek Piper’s research in 1991 — the supposed death toll at Auschwitz has been reduced from 4 to 1.1 million, tho the real figure is actually much less (Barnes Review, August 1996: Editorial), and where is old lefty Pete Seeger to sing us a song about “Where Have All the Bodies Gone?”. Worse than this, the lies of the ignoble prizewinner and greatest of all Shoah (Holocaust) business promoters Elie “The Weasel” Wiesel are beginning to come home to haunt him in a big way — on 6 May 1996, when Wiesel spoke at the University of Washington at Seattle, students handed out or posted hundreds of leaflets containing 15 “interesting questions” about Wiesel’s activities, including whether he still maintains that “geysers of blood ‘spurted’” from mass graves at Babi Yar in Ukraine (Wiesel didn’t actually maintain this, but quoted ‘eyewitness accounts’ concerning which he apparently exhibited no skepticism), and whether he still believes that “Every Jew, somewhere in his being, should set apart a zone of hate — healthy, virile hate — for what the German personifies and for what persists in the German” (Smith, 1996: 4f). Too bad they didn’t ask him how he managed to get liberated from two concentration camps, as an account published in the Christian News states he has maintained, or how he managed to survive after supposedly being knocked a full city block by a NY cabbie, as discussed in a recent Smith Report; but in any event, it seems clear that the OJV is not so much a Big Lie as it is a Big Joke.
* The claim that the nazis were guilty of a “holocaust” and “genocide” against Jews has a special irony. The reason is that, while Jews have whined incessantly about being “victimized”, the reality is that they have far more often been the victimizers; and that all the song and dance about the Holocaust has been a superb disguise for this fact, and an excellent medium for carrying the whine — which might perhaps be said to be a sort of nonstop Grateful Dead concert, since the Jewish dead would surely be grateful that their racial brethren could make so much hoopla and moolah out of it. The numerous holocausts and genocides of which the communists and/or Jews have been responsible include the WWII Katyn massacre in Poland (which eliminated 15,000 members of Poland’s military and intellectual elite), the post-WWII Polish Office of State Security massacres of German civilians (60-80,000 deaths, described in Sack (1993)), the massacre of the Christian Russian kulaks of 1924-30 (15 million killed), the Ukranian holocaust of 1930-33 (7 million starved to death), the holocaust of Russian political dissidents of 1919-49 (12 million dead), the Spanish Civil War massacre of Spanish Christians, the various massacres of Palestinians (Deir Yassin, Qana and others), and so on (Fields (nd)). Needless to say, not a single Jew has ever been prosecuted for any of these massacres. Furthermore, it is testament to Jewish media influence that references to “the Holocaust” and “the six million” are an almost-daily occurrence, while there is never a reference to Jewish Bolshevism’s 50 million, or the larger communist movement’s 100 million. Significant in this context is the 1941 book Germany Must Perish by Jewish writer Theodore Kaufman — widely publicized at the time — which advocated sterilization of all Germans and the parcelling out of Germany to neighboring states (Weber (1996): 33). This mirror-image of nazi ideology which was published before the US entered the war may have inspired the post WWII Morgenthau Plan, which bore the name of FDR’s Jewish Secretary of the Treasury Robert Morgenthau (tho it was actually written by Jewish communist spy and Treasury undersecretary Harry Dexter White), a plan which — in the words of Secretary of State Cordell Hull — was “aimed at the massacre, enslavement and liquidation of the [post-WWII] German people” (Marshalko (1958): 111). One might even argue that the various racial policies (immigration, integration, “civil rights”, affirmative action, welfare, etc) instituted by liberals (among which Jews are the most influential component) are actually acts of genocide against American whites, since the result of these policies is that whites are now projected to be a minority in their own country in only 50 years.
* Since Nuremberg, Jews have made a virtual industry out of prosecuting (or rather persecuting) old men as “war criminals”, irrespective of whether they are guilty of anything, by having ex post facto (“after the fact”) laws passed which allow such prosecutions. Such “prosecutions” have been carried out in several countries, including Canada, France, Italy, and of course Israel; and the US, while not carrying out any such prosecutions, has allowed several extraditions of accused persons. The total corruption of Jewish-inspired activities in this area is nothing less than scandalous, as the John Demjanjuk case so amply demonstrated: The “nazi-hunting” US Office of Special Investigations facilitated Demjanjuk’s extradition to Israel by withholding exonerating evidence, suborning perjury and manipulating proceedings to such an extent that the Supreme Court of Israel — under tremendous pressure to convict — felt obligated to set Demjanjuk free (New American (1996): 12f). But “war crimes” are not the only false allegations to which Jews are habituated; for, as Laird Wilcox has amply documented in his 1994 book Crying Wolf: Hate Crime Hoaxes in America, the “attacks” on Jewish facilities and individual Jews which are periodically reported in the media often turn out to be perpetrated by the “victims” themselves. But if demanding ex post facto prosecutions and falsely accusing others is not sufficient, Jews have allowed Israel to become a haven for Jewish criminals escaping justice in other countries, a fact which has attracted considerable public attention in the US in several notorious cases, and which sends a clear message that — at least from the Jewish point of view — it is OK for Jews to pass judgment on gentiles, but not the other way around.
* The author of the United Nations Charter, Leon Pavlovsky, was Jewish, and the Charter itself was a word-for-word copy of the Soviet constitution (Marshalko (1958): 229). Altho the UN “sponsored” the anti-communist Korean war, the commander of the UN forces, Gen Douglas MacArthur, was constrained from taking the necessary measures to win the war (Stormer (1964): 205) — he was forbidden, for example, from bombing the bridges between China and North Korea over which the Korean army was being supplied — and in addition, all his strategic decisions were known in advance by the North Koreans because this information was passed on to the communists by the UN Undersecretary for Political and Security Council Affairs, Constantin Zinchinko or Zinkovich — a Jew and communist appointee — who was MacArthur’s superior (Marshalko (1958), ibid). (The no-win Korean war was an eerie precursor of another war fought against the communists only a few years later in Vietnam, and brought to a similar no-win conclusion under a Jewish Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger.) In the present day, the UN has provided leftist nations with a propaganda podium for bashing the US and subverting democratic ideals. It has conferred respectability to a host of radical leftist nonsense, including world government (ie, world dictatorship), environmental radicalism (and the totalitarian measures necessary to implement it), world gun control, world press censorship, world taxation, and the stamping out of national cultures and differences, particularly such dangerous phenomena as the American Constitution and the ideas of individual freedom and limited government which it embodies.
* The state of Israel — center of world Jewry — is a virtual textbook case of social sickness and political malfeasance. Israel is the largest recipient of US foreign aid, which amounts to approximately three billion dollars annually (equivalent to a subsidy of about $1000 for every Jewish family in Israel), and total direct and indirect US aid since Israel’s founding in 1948 is approximately $200 billion (Barnes Review, March 1995: Editorial). (The reason for this largesse, as columnist Pat Buchanan observed, is that the US congress is “Israeli-occupied territory”; for any senator or representative daring to take a stand against Israeli “aid” is targeted by Jewish PACs for removal at the next election — and almost always is.) Israel has also received billions more from Germany as “war reparations” — payments which continue more than half a century after the war, which was fought before Israel even came into existence, and in spite of the fact that Germany and the World Zionist Congress signed an agreement on 10 Sep 1952, known as the Luxembourg Agreement, which covered all Jewish war claims and which was paid by Germany long ago (Truth at Last #397: 9). Yet Israel is a socialist state in which taxes are sky-high, labor unions are politically and economically dominant, and — as in any socialist state — the economy is stagnant. This stagnation, incidentally, embraces many of the famed kibbutzes (collective farms), which are able to survive only because of government handouts. What is more, Israel is the only state besides nazi Germany to forbid Jew-gentile marriages (mixed couples usually get married in Cyprus). As is well-known, Israel uses torture (so-called ‘moderate pressure’) and bone-breaking as an instrument of state policy. In addition, there is a large public monument in Israel to Baruch Goldstein, who machine-gunned to death some 30 arabs at prayer before he himself was killed.
* The Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith is a sort of American Jewish secret police which maintains files on some 12,000 organizations and individuals, liaisons with many police departments, and has an annual budget of $40 million. Its contributors’ list “is like a rogue’s gallery of the [Jewish] criminal underworld” (Piper (1997)). Since the 1930s the ADL “has systematically defamed, libeled and smeared anybody who gained public prominence as an anti-Communist” (Editorial, Resister, v 3 #1&2: 5; Otero (1988): 642). Its long-range goal is “to make ‘hate’ a federal crime” (ibid) — except, of course, for the kinds of hate it approves of. Several years ago it was convicted in San Francisco of various crimes in conjunction with its spying activities, but received only the lightest of penalties and continues its operations apparently unabated. It is currently the defendant in a lawsuit over its spying operations brought by former congressman Pete McClosky.
* Jews hold dominant and controlling positions in all the major media including motion pictures, a fact which has been extensively and conclusively documented by Dr William Pierce in his essay “Who Rules America?” which may be found on the National Vanguard Internet website (http://www.crusader.net/texts/bt/bt03.htm). Beyond this, Jews have made major efforts worldwide to censor any information of which they do not approve. These include laws in Germany, Austria, Belgium, Holland, Denmark, France, England and Australia against questioning the OJV — a law which in Germany has resulted in the jailing of almost 7000 people, including two American citizens (Gerhard Lauck and Hans Schmidt) who incurred the wrath of the German authorities by mailing material to Germany which is legal in America. For the last ten years in Canada Jews have been attempting to use laws enforcing “ethnic sensitivity” to silence OJV skeptic Ernst Zundel, a case which continues in spite of two Jewish losses in the Canadian Supreme Court. In America, censorship takes the form of non-mention — a task made much easier with America’s heavy Jewish media influence — or accusations of “antisemitism” (an effective measure for shutting most people up), combined with constant repetition of the Jew-as- victim-of-the-Holocaust theme (there have been more than 400 movies to date on this topic, according to scholar Michael Hoffman II) plus “Holocaust education” programs in Florida and several other states, plus the ever- mushrooming crop of “Holocaust museums”, one of which is having an opening celebration in my own city (St Petersburg FL) on the very night of this writing (February 21, 1998). My own personal experiences with Jewish censorship are described in my book (Bryant (1997)).
* Of all the malignant influences on gentile society in which Jews have participated, financial manipulation — particularly by means of banking — may have had the most profound effect, tho it is difficult to judge to what degree the abuses of finance are due to Jews. We have already noted the deep involvement of Jews in financing the Bolshevik Revolution, the involvement of the House of Rothschild with the Balfour Declaration, the wholesale purchase of the US Congress by Jewish PACs, and the attempt to reduce Germany to economic ruin by means of the Versailles Treaty after WWI and the Morgenthau Plan after WWII. To these abuses must at least be added the creation of the Federal Reserve, an essentially private organization whose charter was written in secrecy by New York Jewish banker Paul Warburg in conjunction with other mostly-Jewish bankers, which has been controlled by Rothschild interests since its inception, which holds economic life-and- death power over the American economy, and which is a cash cow for its stockholders with the privilege of both making its own money and profiting from the economic policies which it formulates (The story of the Federal Reserve is told in great detail in Mullins (1991).) Other abuses of Jewish financial manipulation include (or have been alleged by researchers to include) the Panic of 1837 (intentionally caused by the Rothschild interests as retribution for President Andrew Jackson’s failure to renew the charter of the Second Bank of the United States in the previous year), the Panic of 1907 (apparently intended to spur adoption of legislation which eventually took the form of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913), the depression of 1920-21 and the Great Depression (both caused by an intentional contraction of the money supply), the American Revolutionary War (which, according to Benjamin Franklin, was principally spurred by the English Parliament’s retraction — under pressure from the Rothschild- controlled Bank of England — of the right of the colonies to issue their own currency (Coogan: 181-5)), and the American Civil War (planned, so it is said, by the Rothschild banking interests in 1857), tho documentation in some of these cases is incomplete and motives are not always obvious. While it would be impossible to even begin to document these obviously- startling claims in such a brief essay as this one, the reader is referred to the Bibliography below and to the works to which they refer as a starting point for digging out the appropriate information. It seems worthwhile in the present context, however, to recall the French writer Jean Drault’s assertion of what Mayer Amschel Rothschild, 18th century eponymous founder of the world’s most prominent family of Jewish bankers, used to say to his customers in reference to the family shield depicted on a flag outside his door: “One day this flag will rule the world!” (Marshalko (1958): 51).
What we have said in the paragraphs above may be thought by some as unfair because we have made no mention of the Jews’ many positive contributions to our culture — for example, while only a small minority worldwide, Jews have won more than a quarter of all Nobel prizes. The “Jewish Question”, then, is not one of deciding whether Jews are “good” or “evil”, since they obviously possess both good and bad qualities; it is rather one of deciding how gentiles can protect themselves from the types of abuse which have been discussed in the present essay. To my mind, there is no clear solution to this problem for the immediate future save that of education: As gentiles are made aware of the facts, they will be in a position to defend themselves; and as Jews themselves are made aware of these same facts, they will be less inclined to be abusive — if not from guilt, then at least from shame — and fear, perhaps, of ending up hanging from a lamppost.
In conclusion, let me say that while some will consider the present essay to be antisemitic because it calls attention to various contemptible behaviors associated with Jews, it is equally possible to consider this essay pro-semitic in the sense that, by calling attention to contemptible Jewish behavior, it will help Jews to mend their ways, make their peace with the overwhelming gentile majority among whom they live, and thereby avoid gentile resentment and possible retaliation engendered by their activities. Another way to put the matter is to recognize that those who view this essay as antisemitic are those who take a short-term view of Jewish good: Lies and other immoral behavior are often easier in the short term, but are generally devastating in the long term. The difference between the short-term and long-term views, of course, is the difference between the view of the (immature) child and the view of the (mature) adult. And there are some people in this world who desperately need to grow up.
4. Epilog: The Final Solution?
Whatever may be the sins of Jews against gentiles, I am not an adherent of the theory that Jews are “evil” (or, if you prefer, “bad”), since this constitutes a facile and simple-minded dismissal of a people, most of whom are successful and law-abiding, and many of whose members have made significant contributions to society. Nor do I believe that the Jews have acted because of peculiar genetic or even cultural predispositions, but rather as a result of historical circumstances which have caused them to evolve into what they are today. In particular, I believe that the persecution of Jews, which has been a continuing problem for them over much of their history, has molded and winnowed them into a people of high intelligence with a strong ethnic consciousness and group orientation, since these are precisely the qualities necessary for a group to survive intact under such circumstances. Furthermore, while the generally- acknowledged financial acumen of Jews may derive from their high intelligence and survival abilities, it may also be a product of the fact that many occupations have historically been forbidden to them, and that money-lending — in spite of being denounced by Christians for so many centuries as “usury” — was one of the few things left for them to do. And while there are many undesirable acts and behaviors attributable to Jews, the bulk of them amount to one or both of the two basic Jewish “sins” — the domination of gentile culture and the promotion of liberalism — both of which can be seen as a direct product of the historical forces which have shaped Jews. In particular, dominance of gentiles is an obvious Jewish response to a (well-founded) fear of persecution, and liberalism — whose basic idea is tolerance (and ultimately embrace) of minorities — is an obvious attempt to make (minority) Jews acceptable to the host populations. What we are seeing from the Jew, then, is a visitation of the sins of the persecutors (ie, gentiles) unto the fourth and fifth generation of them that hate Jews, to quote the Second Commandment. The situation with the Jews is a lot like today’s hospitals — the overuse of antibiotics has created “super-germs” which cannot be killed, but which kill a lot of the people stupid or unfortunate enuf to go to hospitals.
But in spite of the problems which Jews pose for gentile culture, a kind of final solution of a somewhat more benign nature than attributed to the Nazis is nonetheless visible at the end of the tunnel. As I put the matter in Mortal Words v 8:
The “final solution” to the “Jewish question” will most likely be a combination of the effects of liberalism and Holocaust worship, both of which the Jews have ardently promoted: Liberalism’s anti-racism theology has caused mostly-liberal Jews to abandon their centuries-old racial exclusivity, with the result that Jewish intermarriage has jumped from 6% to 50% in a generation, meaning that the Jewish gene pool is rapidly evaporating; while the Orthodox Jewish Version of the Holocaust — the most successful and remunerative Big Lie in history — has been so set in cement that, once it has been a bit better exposed (as is rapidly happening thanks to the revisionists), Jews will be too embarrassed to be associated with it, and will abandon altogether any pretense of being Jewish.
As William Cowper might have said, evolution works in mysterious ways, its wonders (and blunders) to perform.
5. References and Bibliography
Most of the books and periodicals listed below are excellent sources of information. Documentation for many of the undocumented assertions of the present essay will be found in them. Many also provide references to further important material. Out-of-print books can usually be found thru the interlibrary loan service provided by most public libraries, or thru search facilities provided by Internet retailers such as Amazon.com.
Bernstein, Jack, The Life of an American Jew in Racist Marxist Israel, Noontide Press, 1984
Bryant, John, Political Correctness, Censorship and Liberal-Jewish Strongarm Tactics in High-IQ/Low-Morals Mensa, Socratic Press, 1997
—–, Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Jews But Were Afraid to Ask Because You Thought You’d Be Called “Antisemitic”, Socratic Press, 1995
Britton, Frank L, Behind Communism, nd, obtainable from The Truth At Last, PO Box 1211, Marietta GA 30061
Butz, Arthur, The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, The Case Against the Presumed Extermination of European Jewry, Institute for Historical Review, 1976
Coogan, Gertrude, The Money Creators, Sound Money Press, 1935. See chapters on “Cooperation” and “The Historical Facts”.
Dershowitz, Alan M, The Vanishing American Jew, Little, Brown & Co, 1997
Douglas, Gregory, “The Browning Version: Hitler, Genocide and an Examination of Sources”, Barnes Review, May 1997: 27ff
Editorial, “The Auschwitz Anniversary — An Occasion for Historical Revision”, Barnes Review, March 1995
Editorial, “The Cheka”, The Resister, v 3 #1&2: 5f
Editorial, “The Goldhagen Tour de Farce: Racial Guilt”, Barnes Review, August 1996
Fields, Dr ER, Was There Really a Holocaust?, Truth at Last, nd
Hale, Matt, Facts that the Government and the Media Don’t Want You to Know, Creativity Movement, PO Box 2002, East Peoria IL 61611
John, Robert, Behind the Balfour Declaration, The Hidden Origins of Today’s Mideast Crisis, Institute for Historical Review, 1988
—–, “Britain’s Balfour Declaration of 1917″, Barnes Review, January 1997: 3ff
Keith, Jim, Mind Control and UFOs: Casebook on Alternative 3, Illuminet Press, 1999
Liberty Lobby, The Garbage Man — The Strange World of Roy Edward Bullock, The Bizarre Story of the Number One Investigator for the ADL’s International Spy Network, 1993
Lorden, Peter J, “Tips From a Trojan Horse”, Instauration, April 1997: 8ff.
MacDonald, Kevin, The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements, Praeger, 1998
Mann, Martin, “There’s Trouble in Paradise As Israeli Factions Do Battle”, Spotlight, 26 May 97: 6
Marshalko, Louis, The World Conquerers, The Real War Criminals, Christian Book Club, 1958 (repr 1983)
Mullins, Eustace, Secrets of the Federal Reserve, Bankers Research Institute, 1991
Nevers, Lawrence, The Fraud of Zionism, privately published, 1997
New American, “Behind the Demjanjuk Case”, 5 August 1996: 12f
Oliver, Revilo P, America’s Decline: The Education of a Conservative, Londoninium Press, 1981: Ch V
Otero, CP, Language and Politics, Black Rose Books, 1988
Piper, Michael Collins, “Drug Mob Enriched ‘Civil Rights’ Group”, Spotlight, 27 Jan 97: 7
Reed, Douglas, The Controversy of Zion, Noontide Press, 1985
Sack, John, An Eye for an Eye: The Untold Story of Jewish Revenge Against Germans in 1945, Basic Books, 1993
Sheiber, Haviv, Holy Land Betrayed, Emissary Publications, nd
Smith, Bradley, “Some interesting questions for Professor Elie Wiesel”, Smith Report, June 1996: 4f
Simpson, William Gayley, Which Way Western Man?, Yeoman Press, 1978. See the section on Jews (599-728).
Stormer, John A, None Dare Call It Treason, Liberty Bell Press, 1964
Sutton, Antony, America’s Secret Establishment, An Introduction to the Order of Skull and Bones, Liberty House Press, 1986. This is Sutton’s magnum opus.
—, Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, Arlington House, 1974 Truth at Last, “Germans Paid Jews in Full”, #397: 9
Weber, Charles E, “Goldhagen’s ‘Evil’ Indictment of Germans”, Journal of Historical Review, March/April 1996: 31ff
39 Good Reasons to Reconsider the Numbers
reposted from: http://www.jewwatch.com
By Eli James
The following are 39 good reasons why you should not believe in the biggest myth of the Twentieth Century:
1.) Consider the source. All of the “evidence” presented at the Nuremberg trials came from two sources: Communists and Zionists. Neither of these groups could be considered impartial. All communists are liars; and all Zionists are tyrants who believe that critics of Zionism should have no public say. Many of these people, such as Leon Trotsky and David Ben-Gurion, were both communists and Zionists! Since the myth-makers cannot prove their contentions in an open, public, discussion, the only choice they have is to quash dissent by making “questioning the holocaust” a crime in every country in the world, except the USA, where freedom of speech is hanging by a thread.
2.) Zyklon B delousing gas was just that. In the days of World War II, typhus was a scourge which was transmitted by fleas and lice. Xyklon B was the treatment given to all prison internees, no matter what their religious background, because typhus had to be controlled. The claim that it was used to poison people is absurd because it was highly flammable. To use it for the purposes described by the hoaxers would have put all of the camp facilities at risk of fire and explosion. Signed confessions, extracted by Jewish and communist interrogators, say that the dead bodies, after death by gassing, were extracted by workers who were “drinking and smoking.” Rudolph Hoess signed such a document, which was written for him. Hmm. Would you turn the gas on in your oven without lighting it, wait a while, and then walk into the room with a lit cigarette in your mouth? Obviously, the hoaxers had little technical knowledge when they made their ridiculous claims. In addition, the manufacturer of Zyklon B gas stated that, due to the adhesive qualities of the gas, it would require a 24-hour ventilation period before anyone could safely enter a room which had been used for such a purpose.
In addition, shaving heads was necessary in order to remove the breeding grounds of the lice.
3.) Killing six million people and disposing of their bodies is no small order for an army trying to conduct a war. Can you imagine the waste of fuel and other resources that would otherwise go to the war effort? Of the thousands of reconnaissance photos available from World War II, why are there no pictures of the fuel tanker convoys which would be needed to deliver the fuel for the crematoria? Why are there no pictures of the smokestacks, which were supposedly belching smoke day and night? The reality is that the Germans could hardly afford to waste fuel for such a purpose. Everyone agrees that the Germans kept tremendous records for efficiency and documentation purposes. Where are the records of these fuel shipments?
Think, think, think, you gullible Christian! The Zionists are laughing at you!
4.) Auschwitz, one of the largest concentration camps, had only about twenty ovens in its crematory. The crematoria at the various concentration camps were very crude and required lots of fuel and many hours to consume one body. One researcher has calculated that, given the exact number of ovens available and hours per body, the ovens would have to be going day and night from the War’s beginning until 1975 before that many bodies could be cremated. Are you beginning to comprehend the absurdity of such a claim? Yet, it is repeated by the Zionist-dominated bias machine on an almost daily basis, and it is force-fed to our school children at taxpayer expense and Zionist urging.
5.) If the bodies were not cremated as many hoaxers suggest, then where are the skeletons of all these bodies? Surely a few dozen would have turned up by now. Or did the Germans find some super-secret body disposal system that no one yet knows of?
6.) Would the Germans go out of their way to provide fuel for the crematoria when their airplanes and tanks were desperately in need of fuel? Not once have I heard anyone accuse the Germans of being stupid. Toward the end of the war, the Germans lost battles because lack of fuel. Would they be so stupid is to redirect fuel to the camps for “the ovens” when battles are at stake?
7.) Jews were singled out for special interrogation because so many of them were communists. The camp directors had to determine whether these Jews were harmless or dangerous – whether they would make reliable workers or just be troublemakers. Those who were determined to be useful workers were allowed many privileges, including the formation of orchestras. If the Jews were automatically gassed (killed), how would any of these privileges be considered, let alone established? The mere fact that there are so many Jewish survivors of concentration camps is evidence against the hoax.
8.) During the entire length of the War, the International Red Cross had constant access to the concentration camps. They delivered mail and packages containing food and clothing. The International Red Cross, despite this constant presence, never once filed a complaint or report about “the ovens of Auschwitz” or any other camp. It truly begs credulity to think that not a single Red Cross agent ever became suspicious, unless, of course, there was nothing to be suspicious about.
9.) The Nuremberg trials were conducted by the OSS (Office of Strategic Services, forerunner of the CIA) at the behest of the Zionist International. The Israeli State did not yet exist. The vast bulk of “evidence” was provided by the pro-Zionist Soviet Union. Neither of these two organizations could possibly be considered fair or trustworthy. Again, consider the source.
10.) Confessions were obtained under duress and torture. “It was this same War Crimes Branch which itself administered the nightmarish trials at Dachau, where prisoners were beaten, kicked, starved, and brutalised by Jewish-American jailers.” — Richard Harwood, from Nuremberg and Other War Crimes Trials, p. 14. In true gangland style, the accused were told that their family members would be hurt or killed if they did not cooperate. Techniques of interrogation included beatings, starvation, testicle smashing and other forms of torture. The German prisoners were often so badly beaten that they could not be brought into the courtroom for fear of demonstrating their adverse treatment. The State of Israel today continues to use torture and murder as part of their terrorist campaign. Amnesty International has repeatedly cited Israel for such violations of human rights.
11.) There were no more than 4 million Jews living in Nazi-occupied territory. As the Nazi army advanced, the Jews fled rather than be captured. On June 30, 1965, the West German government announced that 3,375,000 Jewish “holocaust survivors” had applied for reparations. Now, if we subtract 3,375,000 from 4,000,000, that leaves 625,000 unaccounted for. If we take 625,000 and add a zero to the figure, we arrive at the fictitious and truly fantastic six million lie.
12.) According to the World Almanac of 1947, the world population of Jews in 1939 was 15,688,259. These figures were supplied to the Almanac by the American Jewish Committee. Then, the Jewish-owned New York Times of Feb. 22, 1948 listed the Jewish population in Palestine as 600,000 to 700,000; and for the rest of the world, the Jewish population is listed as 15,600,000 to 18,700,000. If we add the two lower figures together, we get a minimum total of 16,200,000 Jews world-wide, which is still a net increase in the world Jewish population of at least 500,000. If six million Jews had really died, then the total should have been 10,200,000.
But since the whole six million myth was just in the process of being fabricated by the world Zionist propaganda machine, these accurate figures came out before the hoaxacaust figures could be subtracted from the equation. Considering the fact that populations generally decrease during times of war – which it most certainly did for the German people and other nationalities – it is quite astounding that the Jewish population actually increased during this time. The fact is that the vast majority of Jews simply relocated to other parts of the world: Palestine, Russia, America, South America, etc.
13.) According to a pamphlet by Dr. E.R. Fields, entitled Was There Really a Holocaust?, the Red Cross reported in 1946 that of registered Jewish camp inmates, no more than 300,000 could have died. In item #11 above, we were willing to grant that possibly 625,000 were unaccounted for. If half of them died in the concentration camps and the other half died or disappeared to some other country, then our figures agree.
14.) Heinrich Himmler, Chief Commandant of the Concentration Camps, issued an order, dated Dec. 28, 1942, stating: “The death rate in the concentration camps must be reduced at all costs.” – from Reitlinger’s book, The Final Solution. Ladies and gentlemen, the Germans were fighting a war, and they needed the productive capacity of the inmates of the camps to produce war material. An extermination policy would have shifted vital resources away from production to waste. Isn’t this holocaust claim incredible just from this consideration alone?
15.) One of the Nuremberg documents, a letter of April 10, 1943, was issued by Oswald Pohl, the head of the Economic Administration of the concentration camps. After addressing the above-cited order by Himmler, the mortality rate of the camps had been reduced from 8.5% in July, 1942 to 2.8% in June, 1943. Given an extermination policy, why would there be any concern for mortality rates?
16.) Numerous claims of the hoaxers have been amended over time because the claims were obviously exaggerated or invented. In April 1975, Simon Wiesenthal of the Los Angeles Holocaust Center was forced to admit in the paper, Books and Bookmen, “No gassing took place in any camp on German soil.” At that time, Auschwitz and other camps were still in the possession of the Soviets, who would not allow serious researchers into these camps to validate holocaust claims. We expect that, with full disclosure, Mr. Wiesenthal will be forced to admit that no gassing ever took place in any camp.
17.) The Red Cross interviewed thousands of freed camp inmates at the end of the war. When asked if they witnessed any alleged “gassings,” the response was negative. From Red Cross document #9925, June, 1946, the entry states: “The detainees themselves have not spoken of them.” How can you gas six million Jews and nobody notices?
18.) Photos of emaciated bodies, both alive and dead, are not proof of an extermination campaign. The fact is that toward the end of the war, the Allies were bombing railroads and roads to the point of obliteration. This meant that valuable food, medicine, Red Cross packages, and other supplies were no longer reaching the camps. This was the real reason for the malnutrition, not to mention the serious side effects of malnutrition, which would be an increase in all types of disease.
The same thing happened in America during the Civil War. Northern prisoners in the Southern camp of Andersonville were also emaciated to the point of being only skin and bone. The commander of the camp, at his trial, said that he simply had no supplies with which to feed the inmates and he was not allowed to set them free. Pictures of these prisoners could easily be substituted for WWII inmates and no one would know the difference.
One thing we know for sure: The Jews are good at writing captions.
Please note that the published photos of concentration camp inmates show relatively well-fed people lining up for the showers. All of the photos of dead bodies being bulldozed show emaciated bodies. If they were gassed and killed immediately, as the hoaxers claim, there would be some photographic evidence of well-fed people being bulldozed into graves. There is none.
19.) In 1943, the SS arrested Buchenwald Commandant Karl Koch for mistreating and executing prisoners. He was found guilty by SS Judge Konrad Morgan and was executed for his crimes. If there were an extermination policy in force, would they bother trying and executing Commandant Koch? Again, these were work camps designed to assist the war effort. An extermination policy would have required tremendous resources and effort. It would have disrupted the crucial work that was going on and it would have risked undermining the war effort.
20.) Cremating 6,000,000 bodies in order to dispose of the evidence would have left 15,000 tons of ashes. No such volume of ashes was ever found, and no air reconnaissance ever revealed enormous clouds of smoke, and certainly there was never any such total of bodies found. It is only when one considers the enormous lack of evidenceof a holocaust – all the physical matter that would have been left over from such a campaign (six million corpses?!!!!) and the sheer magnitude of such an undertaking – then the hoax becomes obvious. It is only the hoaxers themselves and those who have not really thought about the physical details who believe in this tragic farce.
It is quite certain that the Germans did not have enough fuel to consume anywhere near that amount of bodies. One of the hoaxers, Mr. Henri Michel, editor-in-chief of the Revue d’Histoire De La Seconde Guerre Mondial, exclaimed of Auschwitz: “This camp was the most international and the most western of the death factories, and its soil is enriched with the ashes of 4,000,000 corpses.” — p. 3. The dust cloud of crematoria smoke from such a volume of corpses would certainly have prompted some aerial reconnaissance photos, don’t you think? Where is the evidence? Why is there not one single photo of the crematoria smokestacks belching out their tons of ashes?
21.) William L. Shirer, one of those authors who continued the hoaxacaust story in his book, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, was forced to admit in a footnote on the crematoria: “…the measurements are those which are standard for a crematory oven of not very modern design intended for small cemeteries, and would be unsuitable for mass burning.” This footnote occurs on p. 972 of the German edition only. The rest of the world is still in the midst of the Zionist Dark Age.
22.) Thies Christopherson, a German soldier and author stated: “I was at Auschwitz! There was no gas chamber there.” Now, remember, this man does not practice the religion of lies. His statement was proven to be true when, in 1960, Auschwitz was opened to tourists and no gas chamber could be found. What a disappointment this must have been for the tourists! Later, in order to make up for this communist oversight (they didn’t have much experience at developing capitalist-style theme parks), the Soviets built one themselves! No doubt, the money for construction was provided by some Zionist or rabbinical organization.
23.) The so-called Diary of Anne Frank was not written by Anne Frank at all. Photocopies of the supposed manuscript show two distinct styles of handwriting, one which is not handwriting at all but printing, and the other a very smooth handwriting angled at two o’clock. At least half of the manuscript was handwritten in ballpoint pen. The ballpoint pen, invented during WWII, was not commercially available until after the war. In addition, the American Jewish writer, Meyer Levin, sued Anne Frank’s father and won an award of $50,000 for his participation in the writing of “Anne Frank’s” supposed diary. This fact was only brought to light because one Jew tried to cheat another.
24.) Although death by starvation and disease had increased toward the end of the war, the videos of huge piles of dead bodies in civilian clothing were most often footage which was filmed in Dresden. Dresden was devastated by the firebombing raids of the Allies on February 13 and 14, 1945. This was one of the greatest wartime atrocities in history, because Dresden had become, in effect, a large refugee camp for German women, children, wounded soldiers, and old men. Dresden was one of Germany’s main artistic centers and had virtually no industry located in its vicinity. The Allies knew this and yet they bombed the city mercilessly for two nights, apparently to dispose of war ordnance which would otherwise go to waste, for Germany at that point was a defeated nation and the war was nearing its end. Why not kill as many unarmed civilians as you can? Who will know?
The German refugees thought that Dresden would be a safe haven because of its lack of industry. They were, sadly, wrong. They could not imagine that there would be such immense Zionist bloodlust in command of the U.S. and British military. You can imagine the horror of those who thought they would be safe in Dresden until the end of the war! The war criminals have successfully blocked out this war crime from the history books; but I am sure that Yahweh God will remember those who are responsible.
25.) The Nuremberg trials were an absolute farce. One of the most damning conditions of the trials agreed to by the Allies in the August 1945 London Agreement was “The Tribunal shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence. It shall adopt and apply, to the greatest possible extent, expeditious and non-technical procedure, and shall submit any evidence which it deems to have probative value.”
In other words, let’s railroad these “war criminals” as quickly as possible, so we can go home and collect our medals. How would you like to be tried by a court which does not abide by “rules of evidence?” A mere technicality, you say? Can you see the kangaroos hopping around? Except, these kangaroos have hooked noses and wear yarmulkas now and then.
26.) The fact that American Jews were allowed to be prosecutors and judges is a travesty in itself. The fact that many of them, if not all, were merely instruments of the Zionist International makes the entire proceeding suspect because of a lack of impartiality. No court would consider it impartial if an agent of the accuser were to be allowed to be a prosecutor or a judge. Yet, this is exactly what happened at the Nuremberg trials. Unfortunately, the American people were not aware of these shady Zionist dealings. They assumed, as people still assume today, that the Nuremberg trials were held in accordance to standard procedures.
Regarding the London Agreement, Harwood says: “…the same people who drew up the arrangements for Nuremberg promptly had themselves appointed as prosecutors and judges. Nikitchenko and Falco became judges. Jackson was American Chief Presecutor, Fyfe was Deputy-Chief British Prosecutor. Thus, virtually the same people were judges, prosecution, and court.” — p. 14. And you were told that the Nuremberg trials were fair and impartial?
27.) Incriminating documents were simply fabricated by the Soviets. In his opening speech at the War Crimes Tribunal, Chief Prosecutor Robert H. Jackson appeared to be quoting from a document which he ascribed to Baron Werner von Fritsch, the pre-war Commander-in-Chief of the German Armed Forces. In fact, he was quoting from a typewritten document of unknown origin. No original document was ever produced. (You can imagine how many clerks and other military personnel were recruited by the Zionists, at U.S. and British expense, to produce “documents.” Oops! I shouldn’t encourage you to use your imagination. There’s been too much of that already! Even if you’ve only heard the Zionist version of these events, it would only be prudent to exercise some common sense and good old-fashioned skepticism before accepting their story without criticism. It seems that only the Jews routinely get away without scrutiny. Why is that?)
28.) Budd Schulberg, Jewish film producer, was recruited by the OSS to produce the photographic and film “evidence” at Nuremberg. Again, lack of impartiality at its worst. He received a military reward for his efforts. Surprising that he didn’t get an Academy Award as well! The Jews of Russia (Khazaria), America, Britain and Israel were the prosecution, the judge, the jury, the newspaper reporters and the film crew. The poor, persecuted Jew has no influence at all! Why do the goyim hate him so?
29.) Paul Rassinier, author of The Drama of the European Jews, relates that many of the hoaxers, authors who had profited from the hoax, could not verify their claims. One author, Dr. Miklos Nyiszli, claimed to have been to Aushwitz but gave travel directions which made absolutely no sense. Professor Rassinier attempted to contact Dr. Nyiszli about such discrepancies and received from him a reply through a Mr. Tibere Kremer. As it turned out, Dr. Nyiszli had long since died, so even the reply was a forgery. Says Dr. Rassinier: “…this dead witness – another one – was peculiar enough himself to write to me after his death. And so Mr. Tibere Kremer’s silence is understandable. No further comment.” — p. 41. This incident should give the reader an idea of the quality of the “evidence” which has been presented in the hoaxacaust literature.
When faced with a mountain lies, at least some statements must be true, right? Not necessarily.
30.) Prof. Rassinier’s book is a detailed examination of Jewish populations in virtually every country of Europe, including Poland and Russia, from 1931 to 1945. According to Rassinier’s statistics, in 1931 Europe had 9,777,500 documented Jews (figures from the World Center of Contemporary Jewish Documentation). The population that remained in these locations in 1945 was 4,250,000. The emigrants who left Europe altogether is numbered at 4,416,608. These people went to three main locations: Palestine (the Israeli state had not yet been created), Central Asia (Soviet Union) and the United States. So, the total, documented numbers of living European Jews in 1945, according to Rassinier, was 8,666,608. If we subtract the documented number of survivors from the documented pre-war population, we have a total of l,003,392 unaccounted for. Of these, a certain number must have died from causes unrelated to the war. If we grant that half of them died from such causes, then we have a total of about 500,000 Jews who perished in the war. This is consistent with our previous totals from items 11 and 13.
31.) At the Nuremberg trials, Philip Auerbach, the Jewish attorney-general for post-war Bavaria was denounced by SS General Otto Ohlendorf. Auerbach had claimed the absurd figure of 11 million Jews having suffered in the concentration camps. “Ohlendorf lived long enough to see Auerbach convicted for embezzlement and fraud (forging documents purporting to show huge payments of compensation to non-existent people) before his own execution took place in 1951.” — p. 10-11, The True History of “The Holocaust,” Did Six Million Really Die? – by the Institute for Historical Review.
32.) It has been frequently reported by American prisoners of war that the Germans treated them much more humanely than the Japanese. The same is true for the civilian prisoners in the concentration camps. Many of these people were arrested for being communist spies. Hundreds of affidavits described the circumstances at the camps as “humane.” “One Berta Schirotschin, who worked at the food service at Dachau throughout the war, testified that the working inmates…received their customary second breakfast at 10 a.m. every morning…The Polish underground leader, Jan Piechowiak, who was at Dachau from May 22nd, 1940 until April 29th, 1945, also testified on March 21st, 1946 that prisoners there received good treatment.” — p. 21, Did Six Million Really Die?
33.) Elie Wiesel has a poor memory. According to the New York Times of Sunday, January 4, 1987, Wiesel recalled “the day the Soviets arrived at Auschwitz.” Previously, in a speech to the National Press Club in Washington D.C., in April, 1983, Wiesel “noted that on April 15, 1945, he was one of the survivors liberated at Dachau by the U.S. Army.” – Jewish Telegraph Agency, April 11, 1983. “Oy, vey! I remember it like it vas yesterday” we can hear him sighing. Is this two lies or only one? Wiesel would have the distinction of being the only prisoner of war to be liberated from two different camps. Talk about bragging rights! The father of lies is truly proud of this weasel.
34.) In flagrant violation of the principle of freedom of speech, the Zionists impose their will on every organization they possibly can in order to prevent people from speaking out against the hoax. In Germany, it is against the law to deny the holocaust. Numerous people have been imprisoned for making public statements against the mythology. This fact should infuriate anyone who believes in freedom of speech.
35.) The holocaust industry makes millions of dollars every year promoting this holocaust trash. In literary circles, it is still a “hot ticket.” Truth be damned. Money talks.
36.) The Soviets brought out a bunch of “human skin” artifacts and “human soap” (presumably dusting off the trunks from their WWI displays), but the Tribunal chose not to pursue the matter any further.
37.) One of the chief presiding judges, Charles F. Wennerstrum, denounced the proceedings: “If I had known seven months ago what I know today, I would never have come here…Obviously, the victor in any war is not the best judge of the war crime guilt…The prosecution has failed to maintain objectivity aloof from vindictiveness, aloof from personal ambitions for convictions…the defense had access only to those documents which the prosecution considered material to the case…also abhorrent to the American sense of justice is the prosecution’s reliance upon self-incriminating statements made by the defendants while prisoners for more than 2&1/2 years and repeated interrogations without the presence of counsel.” – Harwood, p. 39, 40. But we are not dealing with the American sense of justice. We are dealing with the Talmudic, Zionist sense of justice. Dare we call it Satanic in origin? Judge Wennerstrum went to Nuremberg expecting to dispense justice. Instead, he was asked to rubber stamp a show trial.
38.) Many prisoners of the War Crimes Tribunal were kept in prison, held without charges being filed for months. This included even the wives of the suspects. (Harwood, p. 57.)
39.) Holocaust propaganda has changed with the times. Truth is not flexible. Lies are. No consistent flow of information has ever been established by the hoax industry. New charges and claims arise, all without any substantiation. Old ones dissolve, depending upon which charges have been refuted or not. We all know that the original story was that the Germans kept their “extermination program” a secret. How else could it have happened, anyway? Recently, the hoaxers, contradicting this theory, have claimed that it was common knowledge in those days that the exterminations were going on, but that nobody did anything about it. This claim has been fabricated for the sole purpose of trying to indict Pope Pius XII for “not helping the Jews.” But how can you prevent something that isn’t happening?
I remember very clearly as a child around 1954 standing in a mom-and-pop grocery store. Two Jewish women were reacting to a radio news story about the holocaust. I will never forget what the one woman said to the other: “If I had known they were being gassed, I would have never gotten on the train.” So, obviously, six million others didn’t know about it either! And she also survived, whatever camp she was in; and, from her statement, she did not witness any gassings either, because this was the first she had heard about it! Sooner or later, the liar gets caught in his lies. The fact that he owns all the newspapers will not prevent this eventuality.
Never underestimate the power of the BIG LIE. The Jews are the masters of it. My personal opinion is the Zionists decided to promote this myth in order to cover up their own involvement with Nazi Germany in transferring Jews from Germany to Palestine. They needed a smoke screen and a continuous barrage of propaganda to clamp the lid down on any criticism of their WWII maneuverings. The more newspaper space that is taken up by their lies, the less room there is for the truth. As the previous stories have revealed, the Zionists have much to hide.
Reposted from: http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v14/v14n1p-4_Weber.html
The Jewish Role in the Bolshevik Revolution and Russia’s Early Soviet Regime
Assessing the Grim Legacy of Soviet Communism
by Mark Weber
In the night of July 16-17, 1918, a squad of Bolshevik secret police murdered Russia’s last emperor, Tsar Nicholas II, along with his wife, Tsaritsa Alexandra, their 14-year-old son, Tsarevich Alexis, and their four daughters. They were cut down in a hail of gunfire in a half-cellar room of the house in Ekaterinburg, a city in the Ural mountain region, where they were being held prisoner. The daughters were finished off with bayonets. To prevent a cult for the dead Tsar, the bodies were carted away to the countryside and hastily buried in a secret grave.
Bolshevik authorities at first reported that the Romanov emperor had been shot after the discovery of a plot to liberate him. For some time the deaths of the Empress and the children were kept secret. Soviet historians claimed for many years that local Bolsheviks had acted on their own in carrying out the killings, and that Lenin, founder of the Soviet state, had nothing to do with the crime.
In 1990, Moscow playwright and historian Edvard Radzinsky announced the result of his detailed investigation into the murders. He unearthed the reminiscences of Lenin’s bodyguard, Alexei Akimov, who recounted how he personally delivered Lenin’s execution order to the telegraph office. The telegram was also signed by Soviet government chief Yakov Sverdlov. Akimov had saved the original telegraph tape as a record of the secret order.1
Radzinsky’s research confirmed what earlier evidence had already indicated. Leon Trotsky — one of Lenin’s closest colleagues — had revealed years earlier that Lenin and Sverdlov had together made the decision to put the Tsar and his family to death. Recalling a conversation in 1918, Trotsky wrote:2
My next visit to Moscow took place after the [temporary] fall of Ekaterinburg [to anti-Communist forces]. Speaking with Sverdlov, I asked in passing: “Oh yes, and where is the Tsar?”
“Finished,” he replied. “He has been shot.”
“And where is the family?”
“The family along with him.”
“All of them?,” I asked, apparently with a trace of surprise.
“All of them,” replied Sverdlov. “What about it?” He was waiting to see my reaction. I made no reply.
“And who made the decision?,” I asked.
“We decided it here. Ilyich [Lenin] believed that we shouldn’t leave the Whites a live banner to rally around, especially under the present difficult circumstances.”
I asked no further questions and considered the matter closed.
Recent research and investigation by Radzinsky and others also corroborates the account provided years earlier by Robert Wilton, correspondent of the London Times in Russia for 17 years. His account, The Last Days of the Romanovs – originally published in 1920, and reissued in 1993 by the Institute for Historical Review — is based in large part on the findings of a detailed investigation carried out in 1919 by Nikolai Sokolov under the authority of “White” (anti-Communist) leader Alexander Kolchak. Wilton’s book remains one of the most accurate and complete accounts of the murder of Russia’s imperial family.3
A solid understanding of history has long been the best guide to comprehending the present and anticipating the future. Accordingly, people are most interested in historical questions during times of crisis, when the future seems most uncertain. With the collapse of Communist rule in the Soviet Union, 1989-1991, and as Russians struggle to build a new order on the ruins of the old, historical issues have become very topical. For example, many ask: How did the Bolsheviks, a small movement guided by the teachings of German-Jewish social philosopher Karl Marx, succeed in taking control of Russia and imposing a cruel and despotic regime on its people?
In recent years, Jews around the world have been voicing anxious concern over the specter of anti-Semitism in the lands of the former Soviet Union. In this new and uncertain era, we are told, suppressed feelings of hatred and rage against Jews are once again being expressed. According to one public opinion survey conducted in 1991, for example, most Russians wanted all Jews to leave the country.4 But precisely why is anti-Jewish sentiment so widespread among the peoples of the former Soviet Union? Why do so many Russians, Ukrainians, Lithuanians and others blame “the Jews” for so much misfortune?
A Taboo Subject
Although officially Jews have never made up more than five percent of the country’s total population,5 they played a highly disproportionate and probably decisive role in the infant Bolshevik regime, effectively dominating the Soviet government during its early years. Soviet historians, along with most of their colleagues in the West, for decades preferred to ignore this subject. The facts, though, cannot be denied.
With the notable exception of Lenin (Vladimir Ulyanov), most of the leading Communists who took control of Russia in 1917-20 were Jews. Leon Trotsky (Lev Bronstein) headed the Red Army and, for a time, was chief of Soviet foreign affairs. Yakov Sverdlov (Solomon) was both the Bolshevik party’s executive secretary and — as chairman of the Central Executive Committee — head of the Soviet government. Grigori Zinoviev (Radomyslsky) headed the Communist International (Comintern), the central agency for spreading revolution in foreign countries. Other prominent Jews included press commissar Karl Radek (Sobelsohn), foreign affairs commissar Maxim Litvinov (Wallach), Lev Kamenev (Rosenfeld) and Moisei Uritsky.6
Lenin himself was of mostly Russian and Kalmuck ancestry, but he was also one-quarter Jewish. His maternal grandfather, Israel (Alexander) Blank, was a Ukrainian Jew who was later baptized into the Russian Orthodox Church.7
A thorough-going internationalist, Lenin viewed ethnic or cultural loyalties with contempt. He had little regard for his own countrymen. “An intelligent Russian,” he once remarked, “is almost always a Jew or someone with Jewish blood in his veins.”8
In the Communist seizure of power in Russia, the Jewish role was probably critical.
Two weeks prior to the Bolshevik “October Revolution” of 1917, Lenin convened a top secret meeting in St. Petersburg (Petrograd) at which the key leaders of the Bolshevik party’s Central Committee made the fateful decision to seize power in a violent takeover. Of the twelve persons who took part in this decisive gathering, there were four Russians (including Lenin), one Georgian (Stalin), one Pole (Dzerzhinsky), and six Jews.9
To direct the takeover, a seven-man “Political Bureau” was chosen. It consisted of two Russians (Lenin and Bubnov), one Georgian (Stalin), and four Jews (Trotsky, Sokolnikov, Zinoviev, and Kamenev).10 Meanwhile, the Petersburg (Petrograd) Soviet — whose chairman was Trotsky — established an 18-member “Military Revolutionary Committee” to actually carry out the seizure of power. It included eight (or nine) Russians, one Ukrainian, one Pole, one Caucasian, and six Jews.11 Finally, to supervise the organization of the uprising, the Bolshevik Central Committee established a five-man “Revolutionary Military Center” as the Party’s operations command. It consisted of one Russian (Bubnov), one Georgian (Stalin), one Pole (Dzerzhinsky), and two Jews (Sverdlov and Uritsky).12
Contemporary Voices of Warning
Well-informed observers, both inside and outside of Russia, took note at the time of the crucial Jewish role in Bolshevism. Winston Churchill, for one, warned in an article published in the February 8, 1920, issue of the London Illustrated Sunday Herald that Bolshevism is a “worldwide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality.” The eminent British political leader and historian went on to write:13
There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate, Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krassin or Radek — all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combatting Counter-Revolution [the Cheka] has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses.
Needless to say, the most intense passions of revenge have been excited in the breasts of the Russian people.
David R. Francis, United States ambassador in Russia, warned in a January 1918 dispatch to Washington: “The Bolshevik leaders here, most of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and they are trying to start a worldwide social revolution.”14
The Netherlands’ ambassador in Russia, Oudendyke, made much the same point a few months later: “Unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole world as it is organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things.”15
“The Bolshevik Revolution,” declared a leading American Jewish community paper in 1920, “was largely the product of Jewish thinking, Jewish discontent, Jewish effort to reconstruct.”16
As an expression of its radically anti-nationalist character, the fledgling Soviet government issued a decree a few months after taking power that made anti-Semitism a crime in Russia. The new Communist regime thus became the first in the world to severely punish all expressions of anti-Jewish sentiment.17 Soviet officials apparently regarded such measures as indispensable. Based on careful observation during a lengthy stay in Russia, American-Jewish scholar Frank Golder reported in 1925 that “because so many of the Soviet leaders are Jews anti-Semitism is gaining [in Russia], particularly in the army [and] among the old and new intelligentsia who are being crowded for positions by the sons of Israel.”18
Summing up the situation at that time, Israeli historian Louis Rapoport writes:19
Immediately after the [Bolshevik] Revolution, many Jews were euphoric over their high representation in the new government. Lenin’s first Politburo was dominated by men of Jewish origins.
Under Lenin, Jews became involved in all aspects of the Revolution, including its dirtiest work. Despite the Communists’ vows to eradicate anti-Semitism, it spread rapidly after the Revolution — partly because of the prominence of so many Jews in the Soviet administration, as well as in the traumatic, inhuman Sovietization drives that followed. Historian Salo Baron has noted that an immensely disproportionate number of Jews joined the new Bolshevik secret police, the Cheka And many of those who fell afoul of the Cheka would be shot by Jewish investigators.
The collective leadership that emerged in Lenin’s dying days was headed by the Jew Zinoviev, a loquacious, mean-spirited, curly-haired Adonis whose vanity knew no bounds.
“Anyone who had the misfortune to fall into the hands of the Cheka,” wrote Jewish historian Leonard Schapiro, “stood a very good chance of finding himself confronted with, and possibly shot by, a Jewish investigator.”20 In Ukraine, “Jews made up nearly 80 percent of the rank-and-file Cheka agents,” reports W. Bruce Lincoln, an American professor of Russian history.21 (Beginning as the Cheka, or Vecheka) the Soviet secret police was later known as the GPU, OGPU, NKVD, MVD and KGB.)
In light of all this, it should not be surprising that Yakov M. Yurovksy, the leader of the Bolshevik squad that carried out the murder of the Tsar and his family, was Jewish, as was Sverdlov, the Soviet chief who co-signed Lenin’s execution order.22
Igor Shafarevich, a Russian mathematician of world stature, has sharply criticized the Jewish role in bringing down the Romanov monarchy and establishing Communist rule in his country. Shafarevich was a leading dissident during the final decades of Soviet rule. A prominent human rights activist, he was a founding member of the Committee on the Defense of Human Rights in the USSR.
In Russophobia, a book written ten years before the collapse of Communist rule, he noted that Jews were “amazingly” numerous among the personnel of the Bolshevik secret police. The characteristic Jewishness of the Bolshevik executioners, Shafarevich went on, is most conspicuous in the execution of Nicholas II:23
This ritual action symbolized the end of centuries of Russian history, so that it can be compared only to the execution of Charles I in England or Louis XVI in France. It would seem that representatives of an insignificant ethnic minority should keep as far as possible from this painful action, which would reverberate in all history. Yet what names do we meet? The execution was personally overseen by Yakov Yurovsky who shot the Tsar; the president of the local Soviet was Beloborodov (Vaisbart); the person responsible for the general administration in Ekaterinburg was Shaya Goloshchekin. To round out the picture, on the wall of the room where the execution took place was a distich from a poem by Heine (written in German) about King Balthazar, who offended Jehovah and was killed for the offense.
In his 1920 book, British veteran journalist Robert Wilton offered a similarly harsh assessment:24
The whole record of Bolshevism in Russia is indelibly impressed with the stamp of alien invasion. The murder of the Tsar, deliberately planned by the Jew Sverdlov (who came to Russia as a paid agent of Germany) and carried out by the Jews Goloshchekin, Syromolotov, Safarov, Voikov and Yurovsky, is the act not of the Russian people, but of this hostile invader.
In the struggle for power that followed Lenin’s death in 1924, Stalin emerged victorious over his rivals, eventually succeeding in putting to death nearly every one of the most prominent early Bolsheviks leaders – including Trotsky, Zinoviev, Radek, and Kamenev. With the passage of time, and particularly after 1928, the Jewish role in the top leadership of the Soviet state and its Communist party diminished markedly.
Put To Death Without Trial
For a few months after taking power, Bolshevik leaders considered bringing “Nicholas Romanov” before a “Revolutionary Tribunal” that would publicize his “crimes against the people” before sentencing him to death. Historical precedent existed for this. Two European monarchs had lost their lives as a consequence of revolutionary upheaval: England’s Charles I was beheaded in 1649, and France’s Louis XVI was guillotined in 1793.
In these cases, the king was put to death after a lengthy public trial, during which he was allowed to present arguments in his defense. Nicholas II, though, was neither charged nor tried. He was secretly put to death – along with his family and staff — in the dead of night, in an act that resembled more a gangster-style massacre than a formal execution.
Why did Lenin and Sverdlov abandon plans for a show trial of the former Tsar? In Wilton’s view, Nicholas and his family were murdered because the Bolshevik rulers knew quite well that they lacked genuine popular support, and rightly feared that the Russian people would never approve killing the Tsar, regardless of pretexts and legalistic formalities.
For his part, Trotsky defended the massacre as a useful and even necesssary measure. He wrote:25
The decision [to kill the imperial family] was not only expedient but necessary. The severity of this punishment showed everyone that we would continue to fight on mercilessly, stopping at nothing. The execution of the Tsar’s family was needed not only in order to frighten, horrify, and instill a sense of hopelessness in the enemy but also to shake up our own ranks, to show that there was no turning back, that ahead lay either total victory or total doom. This Lenin sensed well.
In the years leading up to the 1917 revolution, Jews were disproportionately represented in all of Russia’s subversive leftist parties.26 Jewish hatred of the Tsarist regime had a basis in objective conditions. Of the leading European powers of the day, imperial Russia was the most institutionally conservative and anti-Jewish. For example, Jews were normally not permitted to reside outside a large area in the west of the Empire known as the “Pale of Settlement.”27
However understandable, and perhaps even defensible, Jewish hostility toward the imperial regime may have been, the remarkable Jewish role in the vastly more despotic Soviet regime is less easy to justify. In a recently published book about the Jews in Russia during the 20th century, Russian-born Jewish writer Sonya Margolina goes so far as to call the Jewish role in supporting the Bolshevik regime the “historic sin of the Jews.”28 She points, for example, to the prominent role of Jews as commandants of Soviet Gulag concentration and labor camps, and the role of Jewish Communists in the systematic destruction of Russian churches. Moreover, she goes on, “The Jews of the entire world supported Soviet power, and remained silent in the face of any criticism from the opposition.” In light of this record, Margolina offers a grim prediction:
The exaggeratedly enthusiastic participation of the Jewish Bolsheviks in the subjugation and destruction of Russia is a sin that will be avenged Soviet power will be equated with Jewish power, and the furious hatred against the Bolsheviks will become hatred against Jews.
If the past is any indication, it is unlikely that many Russians will seek the revenge that Margolina prophecies. Anyway, to blame “the Jews” for the horrors of Communism seems no more justifiable than to blame “white people” for Negro slavery, or “the Germans” for the Second World War or “the Holocaust.”
Words of Grim Portent
Nicholas and his family are only the best known of countless victims of a regime that openly proclaimed its ruthless purpose. A few weeks after the Ekaterinburg massacre, the newspaper of the fledgling Red Army declared:29
Without mercy, without sparing, we will kill our enemies by the scores of hundreds, let them be thousands, let them drown themselves in their own blood. For the blood of Lenin and Uritskii let there be floods of blood of the bourgeoisie — more blood, as much as possible.
Grigori Zinoviev, speaking at a meeting of Communists in September 1918, effectively pronounced a death sentence on ten million human beings: “We must carry along with us 90 million out of the 100 million of Soviet Russia’s inhabitants. As for the rest, we have nothing to say to them. They must be annihilated.”30
‘The Twenty Million’
As it turned out, the Soviet toll in human lives and suffering proved to be much higher than Zinoviev’s murderous rhetoric suggested. Rarely, if ever, has a regime taken the lives of so many of its own people.31
Citing newly-available Soviet KGB documents, historian Dmitri Volkogonov, head of a special Russian parliamentary commission, recently concluded that “from 1929 to 1952, 21.5 million [Soviet] people were repressed. Of these a third were shot, the rest sentenced to imprisonment, where many also died.”32
Olga Shatunovskaya, a member of the Soviet Commission of Party Control, and head of a special commission during the 1960s appointed by premier Khrushchev, has similarly concluded: “From January 1, 1935 to June 22, 1941, 19,840,000 enemies of the people were arrested. Of these, seven million were shot in prison, and a majority of the others died in camp.” These figures were also found in the papers of Politburo member Anastas Mikoyan.33
Robert Conquest, the distinguished specialist of Soviet history, recently summed up the grim record of Soviet “repression” of it own people:34
It is hard to avoid the conclusion that the post-1934 death toll was well over ten million. To this should be added the victims of the 1930-1933 famine, the kulak deportations, and other anti-peasant campaigns, amounting to another ten million plus. The total is thus in the range of what the Russians now refer to as ‘The Twenty Million’.”
A few other scholars have given significantly higher estimates.35
The Tsarist Era in Retrospect
With the dramatic collapse of Soviet rule, many Russians are taking a new and more respectful look at their country’s pre-Communist history, including the era of the last Romanov emperor. While the Soviets — along with many in the West — have stereotypically portrayed this era as little more than an age of arbitrary despotism, cruel suppression and mass poverty, the reality is rather different. While it is true that the power of the Tsar was absolute, that only a small minority had any significant political voice, and that the mass of the empire’s citizens were peasants, it is worth noting that Russians during the reign of Nicholas II had freedom of press, religion, assembly and association, protection of private property, and free labor unions. Sworn enemies of the regime, such as Lenin, were treated with remarkable leniency.36
During the decades prior to the outbreak of the First World War, the Russian economy was booming. In fact, between 1890 and 1913, it was the fastest growing in the world. New rail lines were opened at an annual rate double that of the Soviet years. Between 1900 and 1913, iron production increased by 58 percent, while coal production more than doubled.37 Exported Russian grain fed all of Europe. Finally, the last decades of Tsarist Russia witnessed a magnificent flowering of cultural life.
Everything changed with the First World War, a catastrophe not only for Russia, but for the entire West.
In spite of (or perhaps because of) the relentless official campaign during the entire Soviet era to stamp out every uncritical memory of the Romanovs and imperial Russia, a virtual cult of popular veneration for Nicholas II has been sweeping Russia in recent years.
People have been eagerly paying the equivalent of several hours’ wages to purchase portraits of Nicholas from street vendors in Moscow, St. Petersburg and other Russian cities. His portrait now hangs in countless Russian homes and apartments. In late 1990, all 200,000 copies of a first printing of a 30-page pamphlet on the Romanovs quickly sold out. Said one street vendor: “I personally sold four thousand copies in no time at all. It’s like a nuclear explosion. People really want to know about their Tsar and his family.” Grass roots pro-Tsarist and monarchist organizations have sprung up in many cities.
A public opinion poll conducted in 1990 found that three out of four Soviet citizens surveyed regard the killing of the Tsar and his family as a despicable crime.38 Many Russian Orthodox believers regard Nicholas as a martyr. The independent “Orthodox Church Abroad” canonized the imperial family in 1981, and the Moscow-based Russian Orthodox Church has been under popular pressure to take the same step, in spite of its long-standing reluctance to touch this official taboo. The Russian Orthodox Archbishop of Ekaterinburg announced plans in 1990 to build a grand church at the site of the killings. “The people loved Emperor Nicholas,” he said. “His memory lives with the people, not as a saint but as someone executed without court verdict, unjustly, as a sufferer for his faith and for orthodoxy.”39
On the 75th anniversary of the massacre (in July 1993), Russians recalled the life, death and legacy of their last Emperor. In Ekaterinburg, where a large white cross festooned with flowers now marks the spot where the family was killed, mourners wept as hymns were sung and prayers were said for the victims.40
Reflecting both popular sentiment and new social-political realities, the white, blue and red horizontal tricolor flag of Tsarist Russia was officially adopted in 1991, replacing the red Soviet banner. And in 1993, the imperial two-headed eagle was restored as the nation’s official emblem, replacing the Soviet hammer and sickle. Cities that had been re-named to honor Communist figures — such as Leningrad, Kuibyshev, Frunze, Kalinin, and Gorky — have re-acquired their Tsarist-era names. Ekaterinburg, which had been named Sverdlovsk by the Soviets in 1924 in honor of the Soviet-Jewish chief, in September 1991 restored its pre-Communist name, which honors Empress Catherine I.
In view of the millions that would be put to death by the Soviet rulers in the years to follow, the murder of the Romanov family might not seem of extraordinary importance. And yet, the event has deep symbolic meaning. In the apt words of Harvard University historian Richard Pipes:41
The manner in which the massacre was prepared and carried out, at first denied and then justified, has something uniquely odious about it, something that radically distinguishes it from previous acts of regicide and brands it as a prelude to twentieth-century mass murder.
Another historian, Ivor Benson, characterized the killing of the Romanov family as symbolic of the tragic fate of Russia and, indeed, of the entire West, in this century of unprecedented agony and conflict.
The murder of the Tsar and his family is all the more deplorable because, whatever his failings as a monarch, Nicholas II was, by all accounts, a personally decent, generous, humane and honorable man.
The Massacre’s Place in History
The mass slaughter and chaos of the First World War, and the revolutionary upheavals that swept Europe in 1917-1918, brought an end not only to the ancient Romanov dynasty in Russia, but to an entire continental social order. Swept away as well was the Hohenzollern dynasty in Germany, with its stable constitutional monarchy, and the ancient Habsburg dynasty of Austria-Hungary with its multinational central European empire. Europe’s leading states shared not only the same Christian and Western cultural foundations, but most of the continent’s reigning monarchs were related by blood. England’s King George was, through his mother, a first cousin of Tsar Nicholas, and, through his father, a first cousin of Empress Alexandra. Germany’s Kaiser Wilhelm was a first cousin of the German-born Alexandra, and a distant cousin of Nicholas.
More than was the case with the monarchies of western Europe, Russia’s Tsar personally symbolized his land and nation. Thus, the murder of the last emperor of a dynasty that had ruled Russia for three centuries not only symbolically presaged the Communist mass slaughter that would claim so many Russian lives in the decades that followed, but was symbolic of the Communist effort to kill the soul and spirit of Russia itself.
- Edvard Radzinksy, The Last Tsar (New York: Doubleday, 1992), pp. 327, 344-346.; Bill Keller, “Cult of the Last Czar,” The New York Times, Nov. 21, 1990.
- From an April 1935 entry in “Trotsky’s Diary in Exile.” Quoted in: Richard Pipes, The Russian Revolution (New York: Knopf, 1990), pp. 770, 787.; Robert K. Massie, Nicholas and Alexandra (New York: 1976), pp. 496-497.; E. Radzinksy, The Last Tsar (New York: Doubleday, 1992), pp. 325-326.; Ronald W. Clark, Lenin (New York: 1988), pp. 349-350.
- On Wilton and his career in Russia, see: Phillip Knightley, The First Casualty (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1976), pp. 141-142, 144-146, 151-152, 159, 162, 169, and, Anthony Summers and Tom Mangold, The File on the Tsar (New York: Harper and Row, 1976), pp. 102-104, 176.
- AP dispatch from Moscow, Toronto Star, Sept. 26, 1991, p. A2.; Similarly, a 1992 survey found that one-fourth of people in the republics of Belarus (White Russia) and Uzbekistan favored deporting all Jews to a special Jewish region in Russian Siberia. “Survey Finds Anti-Semitism on Rise in Ex-Soviet Lands,” Los Angeles Times, June 12, 1992, p. A4.
- At the turn of the century, Jews made up 4.2 percent of the population of the Russian Empire. Richard Pipes, The Russian Revolution (New York: 1990), p. 55 (fn.). By comparison, in the United States today, Jews make up less than three percent of the total population (according to the most authoritative estimates).
- See individual entries in: H. Shukman, ed., The Blackwell Encyclopedia of the Russian Revolution (Oxford: 1988), and in: G. Wigoder, ed., Dictionary of Jewish Biography (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1991). The prominent Jewish role in Russia’s pre-1914 revolutionary underground, and in the early Soviet regime, is likewise confirmed in: Stanley Rothman and S. Robert Lichter, Roots of Radicalism (New York: Oxford, 1982), pp. 92-94. In 1918, the Bolshevik Party’s Central Committee had 15 members. German scholar Herman Fehst — citing published Soviet records — reported in his useful 1934 study that of six of these 15 were Jews. Herman Fehst, Bolschewismus und Judentum: Das jüdische Element in der Führerschaft des Bolschewismus (Berlin: 1934), pp. 68-72.; Robert Wilton, though, reported that in 1918 the Central Committee of the Bolshevik party had twelve members, of whom nine were of Jewish origin and three were of Russian ancestry. R. Wilton, The Last Days of the Romanovs (IHR, 1993), p. 185.
- After years of official suppression, this fact was acknowledged in 1991 in the Moscow weekly Ogonyok. See: Jewish Chronicle (London), July 16, 1991.; See also: Letter by L. Horwitz in The New York Times, Aug. 5, 1992, which cites information from the Russian journal “Native Land Archives.”; “Lenin’s Lineage?”‘Jewish,’ Claims Moscow News,” Forward (New York City), Feb. 28, 1992, pp. 1, 3.; M. Checinski, Jerusalem Post (weekly international edition), Jan. 26, 1991, p. 9.
- Richard Pipes, The Russian Revolution (New York: Knopf, 1990), p. 352.
- Harrison E. Salisbury, Black Night, White Snow: Russia’s Revolutions, 1905-1917 (Doubleday, 1978), p. 475.; William H. Chamberlin, The Russian Revolution (Princeton Univ. Press, 1987), vol. 1, pp. 291-292.; Herman Fehst, Bolschewismus und Judentum: Das jüdische Element in der Führerschaft des Bolschewismus (Berlin: 1934), pp. 42-43.; P. N. Pospelov, ed., Vladimir Ilyich Lenin: A Biography (Moscow: Progress, 1966), pp. 318-319. This meeting was held on October 10 (old style, Julian calendar), and on October 23 (new style). The six Jews who took part were: Uritsky, Trotsky, Kamenev, Zinoviev, Sverdlov and Soklonikov. The Bolsheviks seized power in Petersburg on October 25 (old style) — hence the reference to the “Great October Revolution” — which is November 7 (new style).
- William H. Chamberlin, The Russian Revolution (1987), vol. 1, p. 292.; H. E. Salisbury, Black Night, White Snow: Russia’s Revolutions, 1905-1917 (1978), p. 475.
- W. H. Chamberlin, The Russian Revolution, vol. 1, pp. 274, 299, 302, 306.; Alan Moorehead, The Russian Revolution (New York: 1965), pp. 235, 238, 242, 243, 245.; H. Fehst, Bolschewismus und Judentum (Berlin: 1934), pp. 44, 45.
- H. E. Salisbury, Black Night, White Snow: Russia’s Revolutions, 1905-1917 (1978), p. 479-480.; Dmitri Volkogonov, Stalin: Triumph and Tragedy (New York: Grove Weidenfeld, 1991), pp. 27-28, 32.; P. N. Pospelov, ed., Vladimir Ilyich Lenin: A Biography (Moscow: Progress, 1966), pp. 319-320.
- “Zionism versus Bolshevism: A struggle for the soul of the Jewish people,” Illustrated Sunday Herald (London), February 8, 1920. Facsimile reprint in: William Grimstad, The Six Million Reconsidered (1979), p. 124. (At the time this essay was published, Churchill was serving as minister of war and air.)
- David R. Francis, Russia from the American Embassy (New York: 1921), p. 214.
- Foreign Relations of the United States — 1918 — Russia, Vol. 1 (Washington, DC: 1931), pp. 678-679.
- American Hebrew (New York), Sept. 1920. Quoted in: Nathan Glazer and Daniel Patrick Moynihan, Beyond the Melting Pot (Cambridge, Mass.: 1963), p. 268.
- C. Jacobson, “Jews in the USSR” in: American Review on the Soviet Union, August 1945, p. 52.; Avtandil Rukhadze, Jews in the USSR: Figures, Facts, Comment (Moscow: Novosti, 1978), pp. 10-11.
- T. Emmons and B. M. Patenaude, eds., War, Revolution and Peace in Russia: The Passages of Frank Golder, 1913-1927 (Stanford: Hoover Institution, 1992), pp. 320, 139, 317.
- Louis Rapoport, Stalin’s War Against the Jews (New York: Free Press, 1990), pp. 30, 31, 37. See also pp. 43, 44, 45, 49, 50.
- Quoted in: Salo Baron, The Russian Jews Under Tsars and Soviets (New York: 1976), pp. 170, 392 (n. 4).
- The Atlantic, Sept. 1991, p. 14.; In 1919, three-quarters of the Cheka staff in Kiev were Jews, who were careful to spare fellow Jews. By order, the Cheka took few Jewish hostages. R. Pipes, The Russian Revolution (1990), p. 824.; Israeli historian Louis Rapoport also confirms the dominant role played by Jews in the Soviet secret police throughout the 1920s and 1930s. L. Rapoport, Stalin’s War Against the Jews (New York: 1990), pp. 30-31, 43-45, 49-50.
- E. Radzinsky, The Last Tsar (1992), pp. 244, 303-304.; Bill Keller, “Cult of the Last Czar,” The New York Times, Nov. 21, 1990.; See also: W. H. Chamberlin, The Russian Revolution, vol. 2, p. 90.
- Quoted in: The New Republic, Feb. 5, 1990, pp. 30 ff.; Because of the alleged anti-Semitism of Russophobia, in July 1992 Shafarevich was asked by the National Academy of Sciences (Washington, DC) to resign as an associate member of that prestigious body.
- R. Wilton, The Last Days of the Romanovs (1993), p. 148.
- Richard Pipes, The Russian Revolution (1990), p. 787.; Robert K. Massie, Nicholas and Alexandra (New York: 1976), pp. 496-497.
- An article in a 1907 issue of the respected American journal National Geographic reported on the revolutionary situation brewing in Russia in the years before the First World War: ” The revolutionary leaders nearly all belong to the Jewish race, and the most effective revolutionary agency is the Jewish Bund ” W. E. Curtis, “The Revolution in Russia,” The National Geographic Magazine, May 1907, pp. 313-314. Piotr Stolypin, probably imperial Russia’s greatest statesman, was murdered in 1911 by a Jewish assassin. In 1907, Jews made up about ten percent of Bolshevik party membership. In the Menshevik party, another faction of the Russian Social Democratic Labor Party, the Jewish proportion was twice as high. R. Pipes, The Russian Revolution (1990), p. 365.; See also: R. Wilton, The Last Days of the Romanovs (1993), pp. 185-186.
- Martin Gilbert, Atlas of Jewish History (1977), pp. 71, 74.; In spite of the restrictive “Pale” policy, in 1897 about 315,000 Jews were living outside the Pale, most of them illegally. In 1900 more than 20,000 were living in the capital of St. Petersburg, and another 9,000 in Moscow.
- Sonja Margolina, Das Ende der Lügen: Russland und die Juden im 20. Jahrhundert (Berlin: 1992). Quoted in: “Ein ganz heisses Eisen angefasst,” Deutsche National-Zeitung (Munich), July 21, 1992, p. 12.
- Krasnaia Gazetta (“Red Gazette”), September 1, 1918. Quoted in: Richard Pipes, The Russian Revolution (1990), pp. 820, 912 (n. 88).
- Richard Pipes, The Russian Revolution (New York: 1990), p. 820.
- Contrary to what a number of western historians have for years suggested, Soviet terror and the Gulag camp system did not begin with Stalin. At the end of 1920, Soviet Russia already had 84 concentration camps with approximately 50,000 prisoners. By October 1923 the number had increased to 315 camps with 70,000 inmates. R. Pipes, The Russian Revolution (1990), p. 836.
- Cited by historian Robert Conquest in a review/ article in The New York Review of Books, Sept. 23, 1993, p. 27.
- The New York Review of Books, Sept. 23, 1993, p. 27.
- Review/article by Robert Conquest in The New York Review of Books, Sept. 23, 1993, p. 27.; In the “Great Terror” years of 1937-1938 alone, Conquest has calculated, approximately one million were shot by the Soviet secret police, and another two million perished in Soviet camps. R. Conquest, The Great Terror (New York: Oxford, 1990), pp. 485-486.; Conquest has estimated that 13.5 to 14 million people perished in the collectivization (“dekulakization”) campaign and forced famine of 1929-1933. R. Conquest, The Harvest of Sorrow (New York: Oxford, 1986), pp. 301-307.
- Russian professor Igor Bestuzhev-Lada, writing in a 1988 issue of the Moscow weekly Nedelya, suggested that during the Stalin era alone (1935-1953), as many as 50 million people were killed, condemned to camps from which they never emerged, or lost their lives as a direct result of the brutal “dekulakization” campaign against the peasantry. “Soviets admit Stalin killed 50 million,” The Sunday Times, London, April 17, 1988.; R. J. Rummel, a professor of political science at the University of Hawaii, has recently calculated that 61.9 million people were systematically killed by the Soviet Communist regime from 1917 to 1987. R. J. Rummel, Lethal Politics: Soviet Genocide and Mass Murder Since 1917 (Transaction, 1990).
- Because of his revolutionary activities, Lenin was sentenced in 1897 to three years exile in Siberia. During this period of “punishment,” he got married, wrote some 30 works, made extensive use of a well-stocked local library, subscribed to numerous foreign periodicals, kept up a voluminous correspondence with supporters across Europe, and enjoyed numerous sport hunting and ice skating excursions, while all the time receiving a state stipend. See: Ronald W. Clark, Lenin (New York: 1988), pp. 42-57.; P. N. Pospelov, ed., Vladimir Ilyich Lenin: A Biography (Moscow: Progress, 1966), pp. 55-75.
- R. Pipes, The Russian Revolution (1990), pp. 187-188.;
- The Nation, June 24, 1991, p. 838.
- Bill Keller, “Cult of the Last Czar,” The New York Times, Nov. 21, 1990.
- “Nostalgic for Nicholas, Russians Honor Their Last Czar,” Los Angeles Times, July 18, 1993.; “Ceremony marks Russian czar’s death,” Orange County Register, July 17, 1993.
- R. Pipes, The Russian Revolution (1990), p. 787.
From The Journal of Historical Review, Jan.-Feb. 1994 (Vol. 14, No. 1), pages 4-22.
About the Author
Mark Weber was born and raised in Portland, Oregon. He studied history at the University of Illinois (Chicago), the University of Munich, Portland State University and Indiana University (M.A., 1977).
Often adult males undergo circumcision. This may be a Jew whose parents failed – for whatever reason – to have him circumcised or it may be a non-Jew who wants to convert. Even a proselyte who has already been circumcised for medical reasons will still have to have some blood drawn!
In these cases, at least, it can be argued that the ritual is carried out with the informed consent of an adult. The circumcision of a child, however, incapable of knowledge and unable to give or withhold consent is nothing less than assault unless there is a medical reason. Let’s not to put too fine a point on it – it is a CRIME !!!
The operation [circumcision] consists of three parts: “milah,” “peri’ah,” and “mezizah.”
Milah: The child having been placed upon a pillow resting upon the lap of the godfather or “sandek” (he who is honored by being assigned to hold the child), the mohel exposes the parts by removal of garments, etc., and instructs the sandek how to hold the child’s legs. The mohel then grasps the prepuce between the thumb and index-finger of his left hand, exerting sufficient traction to draw it from the glans, and places the shield (see Fig. 1, next column) in position just before the glans. He now takes his knife and with one sweep excises the foreskin. This completes the first act. The knife (see Fig. 3) most commonly used is double-edged, although one like those ordinarily used by surgeons is also often employed.
Peri’ah: After the excision has been completed, the mohel seizes the inner lining of the prepuce, which still covers the glans, with the thumb-nail and index-finger of each hand, and tears it so that he can roll it fully back over the glans and expose the latter completely. The mohel usually has his thumb-nail suitably trimmed for the purpose. In exceptional cases the inner lining of the prepuce is more or less extensively adherent to the glans, which interferes somewhat with the ready removal; but persistent effort will overcome the difficulty.
Mezizah: By this is meant the sucking of the blood from the wound. The mohel takes some wine in his mouth and applies his lips to the part involved in the operation, and exerts suction, after which he expels the mixture of wine and blood into a receptacle (see Fig. 4, below) provided for the purpose. This procedure is repeated several times, and completes the operation, except as to the control of the bleeding and the dressing of the wound.
I do not know who came up with this ghoulish notion. While circumcision is certainly commanded in the Torah nowhere therein does it say exactly how this is to be carried out. This is surely the product of the perverted minds of the Talmudists.
This entire procedure is, of course, totally unhygienic. The mohel – the one who carries out the ritual – or the baby or both could be carriers of some infectious disease. And despite Jewish denial that the practice is unhygienic there is clear-cut evidence that diseases are being spread this way!
L. Emmett Holt, M.D., writing in 1913, states:
“A search through the medical literature brings to light a considerable number of examples of tuberculosis spread by means of ritual circumcision. In all I have collected with the assistance of Doctors Alan Brown and Stafford McLean, references or reports more or less detailed of forty other cases …
“While the number of reported instances of tuberculosis acquired through circumcision is considerable there must be a much larger number that have never found their way into literature. It is certain also that syphilis has been spread in this manner. These facts lead me to emphasize the statement made by the late Professor Maas, the German surgeon, that ‘it is the duty of physician to raise his protest against the performance of ritualistic circumcision in every case.’”
“Tuberculosis Acquired through Ritual Circumcision”
Journal of the American Medical Association
Volume LXI, Pages 99-102, July 12, 1913
Has anything changed since then? Not bloody likely! Why then do we not hear anything about infections? Considering the stranglehold Jews have on Western nations how likely is it that infections caused by the traditional circumcision ritual would ever be openly acknowledged and discussed?
And here is something else that few people realize: the practice of traditional circumcision is, clearly and unequivocally, a very real criminal offence! Why is that?
Circumcision is, by any definition, a surgical procedure! We are then looking at two scenarios: the mohel is either qualified and licensed to practise medicine, i.e. surgery, or he is not.
a) If he is not qualified and licenced we are dealing with someone who is practising medicine without a licence! That is a criminal offence!!! He should face criminal charges!
b) If, however, he is qualified and licensed to practise medicine, such as a medical doctor or surgeon, but uses the traditional Jewish method of circumcision, as described above, he is guilty of malpractice. It is NOT acceptable for a surgeon to put his mouth on an open and bleeding wound and suck blood or use his fingernail to make an incision – even if the fingernail is sterilized! This is not just a minor violation of his professional code of practice which might earn him a slap on the wrist. This is a criminal offence!!! He should face criminal charges!
The Psychopathology of Judaism
By Hervé Ryssen
Translated by John de Nugent
Judaism is not merely a “religion,” as many Jews are overt atheists or agnostics, and they do not consider themselves less Jewish for all that. Jewry is also not a race even if it is true that a “trained eye,” most of the time, can recognize a Jewish appearance, that is to say, a characteristic pattern which is the result of their strict observance of endogamy for centuries. Jews see themselves as the “chosen ones” of God, and marriage outside the community is strictly frowned upon. However, mixed marriages do exist and have also helped to renew the blood of Israel during all the centuries spent in the various ghettos where the Jews preferred to live, separately and apart from the rest of the population. The essential condition for such mixed marriages is that the mother be Jewish, since Orthodox Rabbis recognize as Jewish only the child born of a Jewish mother. However, having just a Jewish father or grandparent can suffice for a person to identify completely with Judaism. Jewishness is therefore a “mental race” that has been shaped over the centuries by the Hebrew religion and the universalist project of Judaism.
Judaism is a Political Project
Judaism is essentially a political project. It is important for Jews to work toward the emergence of a world at “peace,” a peace meant to be universal and permanent. It is therefore not a coincidence that this word “peace” (shalom in Hebrew) is found frequently in Jewish discourse worldwide. In the perfect world that they are building, all conflicts will disappear between the nations. This is why Jews have been militating tirelessly for many years for the abolition of all borders, the dissolution of national identities and the establishment of a global empire of “peace.” The very existence of separate nations is considered to be responsible for the triggering of wars and turmoil. so they must be weakened and eventually replaced by a world government, a “one world government,” a “New World Order,” one single world-ruling authority that will permit happiness and prosperity to reign, Jewish-style, on earth.
We find this idea more or less developed both in the writings of certain intellectual Marxists such as Karl Marx himself and the Jewish-French philosopher Jacques Derrida and also in the discourse of liberal thinkers such as Karl Popper, Milton Friedman and France’s Alain Minc. The idea is to unify the world by all means necessary and to generate cultural conflicts that will weaken nation-states. It is for this One World that intellectuals Jews labor tirelessly all over the world. Whether they call themselves left- or right-wing, liberal or Marxist, believers or atheists, they are the most ardent propagandists of the pluralistic society and of universal miscegenation, that is of racial mixture.
Thus, all their strength the Jews – basically, ALL the vocal Jews in the world – encourage non-white immigration into every country in which they are located, not only because the multicultural society is their fundamental political aim, but also because the disintegration of national identity in each nation and the massive presence of anti-white immigrants is designed to prevent the original white population from succeeding in any nationalistic outbursts against the Jewish sway over finance, politics, and the media. All Jewish intellectuals, without any exception, are focused on this question of building the “pluralistic society” and for this they practice constant “vigilance against racism.” In France, influential writers and journalists such as Bernard-Henri Levy, Jacques Attali, Jean Daniel, Guy Sorman, and Guy Konopniki agree on pluralism and anti-racism despite their political divergences in other areas. This obsession, which is very characteristic of Judaism, is also manifested in movies, where many producers and directors are influential Jews. As soon as a film starts defending and promoting interbreeding, “tolerance” and pluralism, we can be sure that the producer of it is Jewish.
Now we can understand better why the former communists and leftists of the 1970s did not have to make such a big leap to become today’s “neoconservatives.” They have merely switched to a different strategy to achieve the same goal: the rule by racially pure Jews over a racially mixed society.
The fact is that after the Palestinian intifada began in October 2000, the Jews in France and the rest of the Western world have realized that nowadays the danger to their interests and their project comes primarily from Islam and from young African immigrants, both Arabic and black. Their aim is to strengthen the modern race-mixing and race-blending society, which they have contributed so much to establish in our country of France. But this mosaic now threatens to break up into separate communities, and this the Jews do not want. They want no separate identities or separateness at all, except a separate Jewish identity and Jewish separateness. Former Marxists in France such as Alexandre Adler, André Glucksmann, and Pascal Bruckner thus support nowadays, along with Alain Finkielkraut, the right-wing, pro-Washington, pro-Zionist party of Nicolas Sarkozy. And yet they have not become French patriots. They react only for the exclusive benefit of Jewry, asking, as American Jews proverbially do on every issue: “Is it good for the Jews ?”
“Tolerance” as a Weapon
The members of the Jewish sect are the most proselytizing people on earth, but unlike Christians or Muslims, who dream of converting all peoples of all races to their faith, the Jews have no plan to convert the world to their own faith, Judaism, but simply to encourage other nationalities to give up their national and religious identities – and live only for the goal of “tolerance.” The unceasing campaigns to blame all Whites for slavery, colonialism, the plundering of the Third World or for Auschwitz have no other purpose than putting the opponent on the defensive, and getting him on his knees not by violence but via guilt. When the Jews are the only people left on earth who are keeping their faith and their traditions, they will finally be recognized by everyone as God’s “chosen people.”
Their “mission” (and Jews frequently use this term “mission”) is to disarm the other peoples, to dissolve anything which is not Jewish or Jewish-controlled, to grind the people down to a powder for making a new identity-free work force, and thus to favor a universal “peace” among the peoples who have no more “divisive” identities.
As their prophet Isaiah said: “The wolf shall dwell with the lamb, the tiger will rest with the kid, the lion and the ram shall live together, and a young child will lead them” (Isaiah 11: 6-9). The Messiah, coming from Israel, and awaited for three thousands years, will establish anew the kingdom of David and will give the Jews an empire over all the earth. And certain Jewish texts explicitly call for this.
Jews are therefore continuously encouraged to campaign, in whatever society they inhabit, in order to promote the unification of the world – and thus to also hasten the arrival of their promised and cherished Messiah. Propaganda is a Jewish specialty, and it is no coincidence that Jews become so influential in all the media. In their hands, the concepts of “tolerance” and “human rights” have become incredibly efficient weapons of white guilt and accusation against the majority culture. In fact, it is not through Jewish-sounding names or a Jewish physical appearance that we can best recognize Jews, but rather from what they write and say wherever they are on earth.
Selective Amnesia and Fabulation
Many Jews, as we know, played an absolutely huge role in the Soviet tragedy 1917-1991 and the thirty million deaths that marked this era. Let us remember that Karl Marx was born into a Jewish family and that Lenin himself had a Jewish maternal grandfather, that Leon Trotsky, the Bolshevik founder and head of the Red Army, was born a Bronstein, while Kamenev (real name: Rosenfeld) and Zinoviev (real name: Apfelbaum) were running the two Bolshevik-conquered capitals of Moscow and St. Petersburg. But the list of Jews who stood out in the mega-crimes of Communism is endless. It must be said and it must be repeated: Jewish officials and Jewish torturers bore a very heavy responsibility in this tragedy. The “perfect” world they concocted and which was supposedly “historically inevitable” turned out from the very beginning to be a nightmare for the Russian population. It was not until 1948 when the Jewish intellectual elite Jewish began distancing itself from the Stalinist government, and this was only because Stalin had launched his “anti-Zionist” campaign, meant to purge pro-Israel Jews from senior leadership positions.
This indisputable Jewish guilt for the gigantic crimes of Bolshevism is now systematically being shoved down the Memory Hole (the phrase from George Orwell’s 1984). In Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s 2002 book Two Centuries Together, the Nobel Laureate and 11-year veteran of the Bolshevik gulag expresses outrage that Jewish intellectuals were still refusing to recognize their ethnic responsibility in the slaughter of millions of Christians. Solzhenitsyn also denounces modern Jews who pose as victims of an “antisemitic” Bolshevik government when that government was in fact heavily Jewish and Jews were among the worst perpetrators.
This selective amnesia is necessary for a people who ceaselessly proclaim their “innocence” of any provocative acts, as we regularly note in their writings, for example in an editorial in Israel magazine of April 2003, “the first Israeli monthly magazine in the French language” written under the name of a certain André Darmon.
He wrote: “To kill a Jew or a child makes God cry, for we are exterminating [in the Jew] the bearer of universal ethics and innocence.”
With this mindset of absolute innocence Jews cannot conceive bearing any responsibility for their atrocities. Jews are only victims, only “scapegoats” in an evil and hostile world. But very soon the Messiah will punish the “wicked” and will restore the victimized sons of Israel to their full rights.
Nevertheless, in this same Israel magazine editorial, a certain Frederick Stroussi asserted that the Nazi government was worse than the Stalin regime. He quoted the cruelties he claimed were perpetrated by certain SS men. For example, we learn from Stroussi that the Latvian SS man Cukur’s hobby was to toss Jewish babies in the air to shoot them in their head as in skeet shooting. He also writes of other episodes, such as the rape of children by the SS before they killed them. The Second World War has certainly stimulated the fertile imagination of the children of Israel.
Or perhaps this imagination is once again a case of the Jews’ own “projection” syndrome, that is, accusing others systematically of one’s very own crimes as a matter of consistent PR policy: always attack. We know in fact – even if the media never speak about it – that many Jews and their rabbis are involved in the felony crime of pedophilia (see Psychanalyse du Judaisme, 2007).
And murdering a child would seem to be more a Jewish specialty than a characteristic of the SS mind. The revelations of tenured professor Ariel Toaff of Bar Eilan University in Israel – the son of the former Grand Rabbi of Rome – and buttressed in February 2007 by his 147-page, heavily footnoted, scholarly work Pasqua di Sangue [ Blood Passover] – reveals proof of ritual murder among some Ashkenazi Jews (Jews of Eastern European origin).
We outsiders are thus supposed to understand that the sufferings of Jews cannot be compared to those of any others. As a consequence, we are supposed to get as indignant as they do when a serious historian such as Stephane Courtois states (in the preface of his famous Black Book of Communism): “The death of a Ukrainian child of Kulak origin [ from the independent farmer class] who is deliberately forced to starve to death by the Stalinist government is as significant as the death of a Jewish child in the Warsaw ghetto.” These simple words were enough to provoke the ire of Frederic Stroussi who declares he was “stunned” by such an affront. Such a remark, according to him, was “despicable” and represented a vulgar attack against Israel: “What does this comparison have to do here?” he writes. “Why do we have to use the slaughter of a Jewish child to transmit this underlying, false and hateful rumor that the Jews overshadow all other victims of totalitarianism and monopolize all the attention on themselves?”
The author of the article, as we can notice, reacts in a outraged and totally disproportionate way to the modest and certainly justified intentions of the level-headed historian Stephane Courtois. Stroussi demonstrates here the “great intolerance to the frustration” which are so characteristic of the Jewish intellectual. Such reactions are clearly not “normal.”
We note that Israel magazine is a monthly magazine designed for the Jewish community and that, consequently, one can hardly accuse Frederick Sroussi of lying to goyish readers, or hiding from the goyim the true nature of Bolshevism and the supposedly malefic cruelty of the SS. His discourse here does not correspond to any false dialectic, as anti-Semites claim, but here, in this magazine by and for Jews, he is reflecting, as a Jew among Jews, writing to Jews, the very essence of their soul: 1) We are always innocent – and 2) Jewish lives are more valuable than those of others.
There is an “attack anti-Semitism” that stems from a failure to understand the Jewish identity and only sees deliberate perfidy where there is in reality a genuine existential anxiety, one generated by a deep psychological dysfunction.
The Jews have never dared to collectively approach the mirror on their inner lives represented by Freudian psychoanalysis, a prism through which the Jews claim to see all humanity, but which, on closer analysis, sheds far more light on the specific neuroses of Judaism. Psychoanalysis, like Marxism, is a “Jewish science” and a product of the Jewish mind. It was therefore logical to wonder how this Freudian “discovery” corresponds to Jewish specificities.
The answer was not initially obvious to the author, and it took the reading and analysis of hundreds of books of all kinds, mostly written by Jews themselves, for him to realize that the searing question of incest stands at the throbbing heart of the Jewish question, and not theoretically either.
Jewish mothers do love their sons, as is well known, but outright incest is at the origin of a well-known mental illness – one that especially afflicts Jews – called “hysteria.” Incest attracted early the attentions of Freud while he was developing his theories. The parallels between Judaism and hysterical pathology are quite natural.
Jewry is well-known for these syndromes: Hysteria, depression, introspection, amnesia, manipulation, pathological lying, ambivalent identity, prophetic deception, sexual ambiguity, and so on. Every Jewish symptom is found in hysteria.
Freud, as a loyal Jew, merely projected the traits of a specific community onto the rest of humanity. In reality, there is no “Oedipus complex” but rather an Israel complex (all Jews together technically being Israel, not just the Near Eastern state). In fact, Jews do not seem to really wish to discuss the topic of incest within their families. On the other hand, all the psychiatrists mention: “The hysterical woman so much wants a child from her father or her doctor that she can persuade herself that she is pregnant by one of them and thus develops a ‘nervous pregnancy.’”
It is interesting that all Jewish writers use the same term to refer to the coming of their Messiah, namely, the “delivery” of the Messiah. The whole Jewish community, we must understand, is “the wife of God” (the Shekhinah of the Kabbalist) who is some day supposed to give birth to the Messiah, and thus the whole of Jewry is indeed suffering from a “nervous pregnancy” not unlike that found in nervous, hysterical women.
Karl Kraus, the Austrian Jewish journalist who did not agree with Freud, wrote sarcastically: “Psychoanalysis is the mental illness of which it claims to be the cure.” But the right and the best formula can be stated in ten words: “Judaism is the disease that psychoanalysis is meant to cure.”
The Sexual Revolution
After Freud, other Jewish thinkers came along who produced a symbiosis between Freudian doctrine and Marxism. Wilhelm Reich and Herbert Marcuse preached sexual revolution in order to break down the patriarchal family and unleash “free sex.” Their theories largely inspired the student riots of May ’68. The 1970s saw a new wave of Freudo-Marxism and Jewish women were in the forefront (such as Gisele Halimi and Elisabeth Badinter in France and Bella Abzug, Betty Friedan and Gloria Steinem in the USA). As time passed, a series of Jewish-inspired laws appeared, one after the other, designed to dissolve the family. In France, a Neuwirth-promoted law legalized the contraceptive pill (1967), then came the challenge to the authority of the father as head of the household (1970), then divorce by mutual consent (1974) and the “right” to abortion promoted by “Holocaust survivor” Simone Veil (1975). A great wave of movie porn accompanied this “liberation” from traditional family values. Here we are compelled to note that Jewish producers and film directors play a very important role in the sex film industry. (See my La Mafia Juive [The Jewish Mafia], 400 pages, 2008). Parallel to this, the Freudian concept of bisexuality favored the acceptance of overt “gay pride” and homosexuality.
A War Machine against Humanity
In fact, the only tangible results of this moral “liberation” was the systematic demoralization and criminalization of the white man, who is denounced tirelessly in movies, literature and history as the cause of all the planet’s ills and of the collapse of the West. The appeal of egalitarianism – as intended by Jewry – tends to level all ethnic differences and identities and brings about their slow destruction.
Yitzhak Attia, director of French-language seminars at the Yad Vashem Holocaust institute in Tel Aviv wrote this himself in the same issue of Israel magazine:
Even if reason tells us, even shouts with all its force the very absurdity of this confrontation between the small and insignificant people of Israel [i.e, all Jewry worldwide, not just “the State of Israel”] and the rest of humanity… as absurd, as incoherent and as monstrous as it may seem, we are engaged in close combat between Israel and the Nations – and it can only be genocidal and total because it is about our and their identities.
You read it right : Between the Jewish people and the rest of humanity the struggle can only be “genocidal and total.” The “peace” which Israel intends to confer is no more and no less than “genocide,” the warrant for the execution of all humanity – except for those allowed to live as cultureless slaves.
The Neutralization of the Devil
The question is whether the aggressiveness of Judaism can be neutralized in order to save humanity from its evils, evils that could prove even more serious than Marxism such as psychoanalysis and the ideology of globalism. First of all, we must face the facts: After all these centuries of mutual misunderstanding, the antisemitic Christians, the Muslims, and Hitler have all failed to resolve the Jewish question. The fact is that the Jews feed on and grow off the hatred they have engendered among all the peoples of this world. This hatred, it must be said, is vital for their survival and for their spiritual genetics. It has allowed them for many centuries now to close ranks within their community against an external enemy, while other civilizations have disappeared.
For their part, the rabbis spare no efforts to keep their gene pool Jewish. And so even a renegade Jew remains a Jew, and therefore it is perfectly useless to attempt to leave the Jewish prison community. Judaism is indeed a prison. Claiming that a Jew cannot ever stop being Jewish works in favor of Jewry’s survival.
Our mission must be to accommodate these sick among us, because the Jews are not “perfidious” people as much as they are sick people to be cured.
Jews are to be loved individually and sincerely in order to free them from the prison in which they are locked. Only then will they become free from the cult’s grip – and from the threat they pose to themselves and to all humanity.
Only then we will become free from this grip, and at the same time, they will free themselves from the evil inside them that threatens all mankind.
Hervé Ryssen is the author of Les Espérances planétariennes (Levallois-Perret: Éditions Baskerville, 2005), Psychanalyse du judaïsme (Levallois-Perret: Éditions Baskerville, 2006), Le Fanatisme juif (Levallois-Perret: Éditions Baskerville, 2007), La Mafia juive (Levallois-Perret: Éditions Baskerville, 2008), and Miroir du judaïsme (Levallois-Perret: Éditions Baskerville, 2009).
John De Nugent
The link below will take you to the article by John about the Mary Phagan murder case ….. which led to the creation of the ADL (Anti Defamation League). Ironically, the ADL spends all of its money, time and energy on ….. defamation of anybody who refuses to kiss Jewish arse.
Reposted from: www.theendofzion.com
The key to Jewish power rests principally on two things: control of banking and finance, and control of mass media. One is used as a tool to enslave us physically, the other mentally. Over the past hundred years they have gained almost a complete monopoly on them both throughout the world, especially in the West. In order to grasp the full extent of Jewish power today and understand how they have acquired it, one needs to look briefly at the history of banking, beginning with the Bank of England.
The Jews were kicked out of England in 1290 by King Edward I for money-lending. He gave them a deadline and declared that any Jews found in England after that time would be executed. Laws were then enacted to ensure that they could never return.
England prospered for hundreds of years without the Jews until finally, in 1656, they were let back in by Oliver Cromwell. Thirty eight years later, in 1694, they set up the Bank of England.
Jewish banking utilizes the immoral and historically condemned practice of usury and is designed to enslave entire countries through accumulating interest that can never be paid off. Within a century of Jews having seized financial dominance, England’s national debt went from a mere 1.5 million to an astronomical 848 million.
With the Rothschild family at the forefront, one by one they began setting up banks of this nature in countries all across Europe. In Russia, the Czar refused a Jewish central bank, and for this Nathan Rothschild vowed to one day destroy him and his family. America was also somewhat resistant to this treachery, but in 1913, with their puppet President Woodrow Wilson and a sold out Congress, the Jews finally established their private Federal Reserve bank.
After securing their bank in America, the world’s foremost superpower, the Jewish agenda kicked into high gear and, through an astonishing series of manufactured events, they were were able to secure a heavily-funded sovereign state and a stranglehold on the Western powers in a few short decades.
These events were, principally:
1914: World War I
1915: The break-up of the Ottoman Empire (in order to destabilize the Middle East and pave the way for Israel)
1917: The Bolshevik Revolution in Russia
1929: The Jewish engineered stock market crash and Great Depression (which resulted in a massive transfer of wealth from the common people to elite bankers)
1945: World War II
1948: The founding of the Jewish State of Israel
The two World Wars were necessary for the maintenance of Jewish power. They could not afford to allow any European country to ever become too independent and free itself from their control again, as this would expose the corrosive nature of their influence to the whole world. They also needed their own state, to serve as their military headquarters and safe haven, should their criminal deeds ever be found out.
Thus, the main purposes of World War I were as follows:
- destabilize Europe and the world,
- destroy Jewish-controlled England’s main competitor, Germany
- slaughter as many Gentiles as possible and
- establish the State of Israel.
It ultimately took two wars to achieve these aims.
During the First World War, a group of radical Jewish revolutionaries led a violent Communist revolution in Russia and began the most brutal reign of terror and mass murder in all of recorded history. They accomplished this revolution by filling the heads of the proletariat, or peasant class, with Communist propaganda, and coercing them to violently revolt against the middle class and government, whom they claimed were inherently responsible for all of the supposed evils plaguing Russia at the time. Known as the Bolsheviks, the two main Communist leaders, Leon Trotsky (Braunstein) and Vladimir Lenin (Ulyanov) were funded with tens of millions of dollars by Jewish bankers in New York City. Resistant parts of the country, namely the Don Cossacks, were unable to fend off the Bolshevik army because of insufficient manpower due to WWI and traitors from within.
As soon as they seized power and had ritualistically slaughtered the Czar along with his wife and son and four daughters, the Jewish Bolsheviks immediately began mass murdering the Russian people.
First they went after the intelligentsia; the lawyers, doctors, poets, teachers, scholars, scientists and even college students, who they felt had the potential to be the next generation of leaders. Anyone that could eventually lead the Russian people into liberating themselves from the Communist death-grip was hastily liquidated.
Communist leaders were inevitably inflicted with extreme paranoia, because the system that they were attempting to implement is an inherently unworkable one. They understood that anybody with a critical mind would be able to see through the scam. This pathological paranoia, along with the long-time contempt the Jews held for the Slavic race, were the core driving factors behind the Communist atrocities.
Alexander Solzhenitsyn, a Russian who lived through this nightmare, wrote in his book Gulag Archipelago that the communists ultimately killed a total of 66 million Russians in their gulag death camps. The prisoners of these camps were either worked to death or murdered.
The level of cruelty, sadism and bloodlust of the Jews who were running these death camps is breathtaking. Priests were crucified and had their eyes gouged out and tongues cut off. Their churches were burnt to the ground or turned into toilet houses or Synagogues. Some of the victims were boiled alive. Others were placed in boxes with rats or had hot lead poured into their mouths. Babies were cut out of pregnant women and slaughtered in front of the mothers. Some victim’s had their stomachs cut open and their intestines nailed to a pole and then were forced to run around the pole until their guts unraveled and they died. Sometimes the next day’s victim was forced to watch. Children were tortured in front of their parents. Women in front of their husbands.
A former Soviet functionary named Mikhail Voslensky wrote about some of the methods of torture and murder in his book Nomenclature:
“In Kharkov, people were scalped. In Vorenezh, the torture victims were placed in barrels into which nails were hammered so that they stuck out on the inside, upon which the barrels were set rolling. A pentacle (usually a five pointed star formerly used in magic) was burned into the foreheads of the victims. In Tsaritsyn and Kamyshin, the hands of victims were amputated with a saw. In Poltava and Kremenchug, the victims were impaled. In Odessa, they were roasted alive in ovens or ripped to pieces. In Kiev, the victims were placed in coffins with a decomposing body and buried alive, only to be dug up again after half an hour.”
The American Rohrbach Commission described some of the carnage in Defender magazine (October, 1933):
“The whole cement floor of the execution hall of the Jewish Cheka of Kiev was flooded with blood; it formed a level of several inches. It was a horrible mixture of blood, brains and pieces of skull. All the walls was bespattered with blood. Pieces of brains and of scalps were sticking to them. A gutter of 25 centimeters wide by 25 centimeters deep and about 10 meters long was along its length full to the top with blood.
“Some bodies were disemboweled, others had limbs chopped off, some were literally hacked to pieces. Some had their eyes put out the head, face and neck and trunk were covered with deep wounds. Further on, we found a corpse with a wedge driven into its chest. Some had no tongues. In a corner we discovered a quantity of dismembered arms and legs belonging to no bodies that we could locate.”
Many neighboring countries also felt the wrath of this murderous Jewish regime in Russia. The Soviet Jews Lazar Kaganovich, Genrikh Yagoda and Nikolai Yezhov orchestrated the ruthless genocide of 7-10 million Ukranians in 1932-1933 in a little known terror-famine called the Holodomer. The Communist menace was set to sweep across all of Europe to murder, rape and enslave the whole continent the same way it did in Russia.
Meanwhile, Germany was suffering from a horrific economic breakdown due to Jewish banking intrigue and the loss of World War I. This breakdown, and the very real internal and external threat of a Communist takeover were the main reasons that Adolf Hitler, the most lied about man in all of human history, rose to power.
Hitler was the most effective opponent of Jewish supremacism of all time. He understood the Jewish hand behind much of the suffering in Germany and the rest of the world, and made it quite clear in his book Mein Kampf that he was going to deal with them when he came to power. This alarmed International Jewry, so when he was lawfully appointed as Chancellor in 1933, they collectively declared war on Germany with a worldwide economic boycott. This one fact alone negates the outrageous claim that Hitler started World War II.
Hitler desperately struggled to prevent the war and reach true peace with the allies. One need only to read some of his speeches from that time period to prove this, many of which are available online.
Hitler was essentially forced into the war. He patiently stood by as the Jewish controlled Polish government committed unspeakable atrocities on the ethnic Germans that were living in territory that was confiscated from Germany in the wake of WWI. Unable to settle this matter diplomatically, and after thousands of murders of German civilians, he had no choice but to invade Poland to protect his people and reclaim the territory that had historically belonged to Germany.
This provided the excuse needed for Britain and France to declare war on Germany under the guise of “protecting Poland.” The Soviet Union invaded Poland from the east around the same time as Germany, yet this is hardly ever mentioned.
The German war machine conquered western Poland in about a month with one of its infamous Blitzkrieg assaults. This is actually a very humane way of fighting compared to the traditional drawn-out way of war, which causes much more civilian death and economic hardship.
German officials later went on to uncover the mass graves of what eventually numbered close to 22,000 Polish citizens buried in the Katyn Forest near Smolensk, Russia and elsewhere. In the same way they had done in Russia, after conquering Poland the Communists had rounded up all of the intelligentsia and executed them with a single bullet to the back of the head.
This atrocity was, and sometimes still is, blamed on the Germans. The lies propagated about this era are endless, and include, of course, the biggest lie of all, which is that of the so-called Jewish Holocaust.
Even on its face, the idea that the “Nazis” were capable of rounding up six million Jews, hauling them off to concentration camps in Poland, gassing them, and then burning the corpses and making the ash disappear, while fighting a war on all fronts against all three of the world’s superpowers, is absurd. Rounding up internal enemies (Communists) and making them work to supply the massive war machine is much more plausible and is, indeed, the true story of the so-called “death camps.”
Not only do those who make this claim of six million gassed Jews not supply one iota of proof, aside from some deceptive and/or doctored photos and conflicting eyewitness testimonies from confirmed liars, the story has also been forensically and scientifically proven beyond a shadow of a doubt to be totally impossible.
In 1995, the number of victims supposedly killed at Auschwitz was officially revised from 4 million to 1.5 million. That one revision would change the official 6 million figure to 3.5 million, yet it is still illegal to even question the 6 million figure publicly in 16 European countries and Canada. These laws will no doubt eventually pass in America also if the powerful Jewish lobby groups have their way.
Most people are unaware of these oppressive laws; anyone who simply raises questions about the official narrative of this so-called historical event, anywhere in the European Union or Canada, is liable to be taken to court and jailed for up to five years. That alone speaks volumes about the nature of the story – truth hardly needs laws to defend it.
Another big lie about this era is that Hitler was some type of evil tyrant that oppressed the German people. Nothing could be further from the truth. Germany under Hitler was a virtual utopia, and Jews were treated very fairly considering the circumstances. He personally granted clemency to as many as 10,000 of them as long as they showed themselves to be loyal to Germany and not Communist agitators or ethnocentric, immoral criminals like the bulk of their tribe.
Germany was on the brink of destruction when Hitler took power. There was widespread unemployment, hyperinflation and people starving in the streets and committing suicide on a mass scale. Hitler was able to unify Germany and turn it into a virtually crime-free, highly-productive nation with full employment, in just eighteen months. That Hitler freed his people and transformed Germany into a booming empire and economic powerhouse is perhaps the most closely guarded secret of modern times, and no doubt a big reason for many of the lies told about him in the mainstream and alternative media alike.
How he accomplished this is simple: he dismantled the Jewish banking system and issued debt-free currency. He kicked the Jews out of the media and every other position of power.
International Jewry could not afford to let Hitler teach the world that the secret to building a free and prosperous nation is to get rid of the parasitic Jews, so, in their eyes, Germany had to be destroyed, and any memory of this man’s heroic deeds needed to be ruthlessly suppressed for all time.
And destroy Germany is exactly what the Jews did, using the nations that they, for all intents and purposes, had already subverted and conquered from the inside.
The fact that the Jews could be responsible for this disastrous war that claimed over 80 million lives, more than half of whom were civilians, and then convince the world that they were the primary victims, is absolutely astonishing. The “chutzpah” of the Jews knows no bounds.
The main victims of WWII were actually the Germans. What we are taught about this war is almost an exact inversion of the truth. Millions upon millions of innocent German civilians – women and children and elderly – were raped, starved to death, and firebombed into oblivion, in some of the most despicable war crimes imaginable, even after the war was officially over.
And we are told that this was a “moral” war, fought by the “greatest” generation.
Germany’s loss was a loss for us all. But a win for the Jews. A big one. Since then they have been the undisputed masters of the world. They have taken over just about every major institution with virtually no opposition, using their “Holocaust” story as a shield against any criticism, and a battering ram against the Gentile world.
Who’s going to stop them? With their monopoly over the media, any opinion that doesn’t follow the official Jewish guidelines of “political correctness” is ridiculed, demonized, or simply ignored.
The Jews have been riding high since World War II. They got their State of Israel, after brutally genociding the Palestinians and stealing their land in the name of “escaping persecution,” and have been using it to wreak havoc on the Middle East and the world ever since.
We gentiles, on the other hand, have been dragged down into the lowest pits of depravity. Homosexuality and sexual degeneracy are rampant and being normalized, our borders are wide open, a technological police state is enslaving us, the Muslim world has been destroyed by Jewish engineered conflicts that are leading us towards another World War, and Whites can’t even look out for their own interests without being shot down as ‘Nazis,’ ‘haters,’ ‘racists’ and ‘White Supremacists.’
Does that sound like the winners of a “moral” war, fought by the “greatest” generation to you?
Everybody must know deep down in their hearts that something is terribly wrong with the world. We stand as a defeated people, but there is still time to rise above and once again become the masters of our own destiny. We either face the Jews and the communists now, or wait to get a bullet in the back of the head like the poor Russians and other Eastern Europeans.
It’s going to take a lot of physical and moral courage, but when the future of our children is at stake, is there really any risk too great, any sacrifice too big, any comfort that is not worth giving up, to stand up and do whatever it takes to make things right?
Let us not allow the sacrifices of Adolf Hitler and the noble German people to have been in vain.
“Those who want to live, let them fight, and those who do not want to fight in this world where eternal struggle is the law of life, do not deserve to live.” – Adolf Hitler
Few labels are as feared by Gentiles and as liberally used by Jews as anti-Semite and holocaust denier. The German butchers killed six million Jews during WW2 and now the Moslem barbarians are trying to emulate the Nazis; they want to drive the Jews out of their refuge, the God-given Land of Israel, and into the sea.
This is something that everybody knows because the Jewish-owned media tell us. So how can any sane person still doubt? Don’t you feel compassion for the victims of irrational Gentile hatred and persecution throughout the ages and in all lands? Don’t you feel guilty and ashamed?
And don’t you agree with the Jews that anyone who doubts that the holocaust happened or even just asks legitimate questions clearly deserves the punishment he gets? To wit: heavy fines, vilification, ostracism, loss of career or business, physical assault, imprisonment and much much worse.
I will ask some important questions that have been asked many times before and still await answers! To the Jewish thought police I say: you are welcome to label me an anti–Semite and/or a holocaust denier or anything else you like! I don’t give a bloody damn!
So here we go! Was Cleopatra really beautiful? Did Columbus discover America? Or was it the Vikings? Did Moses part the Red Sea? Did Hitler commit suicide? Or did he escape to Antarctica? Did six million Jews really die? Or is this perhaps the 20th century’s greatest hoax?
Having been born after the above-mentioned people lived and after the events are supposed to have happened I can honestly answer with a resounding: “I DO NOT KNOW!” I have no first-hand knowledge of anything that transpired before I was born.
Anything I have not personally experienced is quite literally nothing more than hearsay. Therefore, I cannot categorically state, for instance, that the holocaust happened and neither can I claim that it did not happen!
As a sane and self-respecting man, however, I do not just accept anybody’s say-so as the truth. In order to help me arrive at a reasonably accurate picture of reality I assert the right to ask questions and assess the merits of the answers for myself.
United Nations declaration No. 19
“Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers”.
The United Nations grants me rights? Nonsense! I already have them because I was born with them! And I will not allow myself to be gagged by anybody in my search for answers or in my desire to discuss and disseminate what I find out and hold to be true. Should my conclusions be found wrong (I do not claim to be infallible!) I will nevertheless insist on being refuted in a civilized manner and on the basis of verifiable facts and/or the unbiased testimony of trustworthy witnesses.
It is now almost seventy years since the end of WW2 and the proponents of the holocaust thesis have failed to provide any proof for their claims. Their response to the challenge is utterly predictable: the same lame accusation of anti-Semitism.
They never attempt to enter into a debate about facts. They prefer knee-jerk reactions of denial, suppression of free speech, smear campaigns, litigation, physical attacks or worse. That alone indicates to me that there is something they don’t want anybody to know about.
When I lived in Israel I spoke to Jews who claimed to be holocaust survivors. Their testimony confirmed to me that concentration camps existed and that they were not fun-filled holiday camps! Big deal! I knew that already! But not a shred of proof was offered that they were death camps!
I suspected that some of their claims were grossly exaggerated, either intentionally or as a result of memories fading over time. Others struck me as shameless lies. Paying attention not only to what they said but also to how they told their stories I had the feeling that they seemed to enjoy talking about their “suffering”, as if it was – how shall I put it delicately? – the highlight of their lives. It reminded me of the pompous speeches of Australian war veterans and politicians about the evil nature of war. Many many years ago one of the few WW1 veterans left at that time said during a TV interview, wistfully and with a smile: “It wasn’t such a bad old war!”
Perhaps it wasn’t such a bad old holocaust either? It has certainly proved to be quite profitable. Look at what it yielded: a Jewish state founded on Gentile sympathy (read: manipulated feelings of guilt and shame!) and built with money extorted from Gentiles.
Then there is the internationally recognised status of “perpetual victim”, granting Jews a special dispensation to ignore or violate, without fear of censure or retribution, any moral and man-made law in the pursuit of any selfish goal. A carte blanche to do as they please – absolutely priceless!
You know the song: “There is no business like shoah business!” But business is not doing so well lately. More and more people start asking the same questions and demand answers. There is this pesky thing called the Internet that allows people to communicate and exchange information concerning matters that Jews would prefer to remain hidden.
Aware of the fact that they have no evidence to back up their claims Jews are now desperately creating “racial discrimination” and “hate crime” laws all over the world, enacted by their whores in politics and enforced by their whores in the police and the “justice” system. The purpose of such laws is clear: they want to cover their own arses by preventing research, by eliminating dissent, by removing free speech.
They are incapable of caring about anybody but themselves. They are sociopaths or psychopaths and while they do not actually feel compassion they are cunning enough to fake it when it suits them. That’s why they make it appear as though the legislation defends and protects coloured people, gays and lesbians and minorities of all sorts – religious or ethnic or political. It sure looks less selfish that way, more convincing!
There is no need to protect the truth! Two plus two equals four! If you deny that fact you are a fool but hardly a criminal deserving to be fined or imprisoned. By the same token: if the holocaust were a fact and a self-evident truth as claimed by Jews why would you need to protect it with draconian legislation?
The historicity of the holocaust is not a matter for Jew-inspired legislation and kangaroo courts to decide on! It is something for independent historians and unbiased forensic scientists to deal with. Their verdict: the evidence points to fraud!!!
Revisionists estimate that the combined death toll in all German concentration camps was between 300,000 to 500,000. Of that number about half were Jews. This figure is based on documentation, including reports released by the International Red Cross which inspected the camps, the Auschwitz death registries released to the Soviet archives in 1990 (which recorded only 69,000 deaths in Auschwitz), and other evidence. The main cause of death was the typhus epidemic and starvation and none of that was intentional! The “Holocaust Horror” story is physically impossible, and has been thoroughly discredited.
It is a sob story!
Debunking The Genocide Myth by Paul Rassinier – 2MB
Did Six Million Really Die by Barbara Kulaszka – 6 MB
I was born in 1948 in Germany and grew up, as a Roman Catholic, first in a small village and then, from the age of 7, in Trier, allegedly the oldest town in Germany and for a brief period even the capital of the Roman Empire.
After WWII the older generation of Germans was subjected to de-nazification while the young generation was taught the new and “correct” version of history, written by the victors and endorsed by their minions amongst the Germans.
I swallowed the official story as peddled on radio and TV, in books, magazines and newspapers – hook, line and sinker. Thus conditioned I felt contempt, bordering on hatred, for my own people, in fact, everything German! I fell for every propaganda piece about the bad, bad Nazis and the suffering of the innocent, noble and heroic Jewish people.
There is no doubt in my mind that the feelings of guilt and shame as well as mindless adoration of the Jews was the intended outcome of such indoctrination. Anyone who harbours guilt and shame will be easy prey for a manipulator!
Before long I began to see them in exactly the same way they see themselves: as God’s Chosen People, a Kingdom of Priests and a Light unto the Nations, the moral and intellectual vanguard of the human race, the glorious crown of creation. I have to cut myself some slack: our education was one-sided; we had no access to dissenting information. It wasn’t until I left Germany, for instance, that I could acquire a copy of Hitler’s book “Mein Kampf”, which is prohibited in Germany. What’s more: I was young and naive, idealistic and impressionable and, truth be told, the idea of belonging to a very special group of people appealed to my adolescent arrogance.
But I took this much further than most people. After my migration to Australia I converted to Orthodox Judaism before the Melbourne Beth Din (a Jewish court of law) in 1982. Looked at in hindsight it is clear that the true motivation for this step had less to do with religious faith than it had to do with programming and feelings of guilt, although I don’t remember to have been aware of this at the time.
After the conversion I immediately left for Israel where I spent the next four years before finally returning to Australia. And what an eye-opener Israel was! I hated every minute of it and yet I view my stay in Israel as a blessing in disguise. If I hadn’t converted and lived in Israel, I would not have had the opportunity to get that close to the Chosenites. Chances are I would probably have remained a mindless admirer, a brain-dead apologist, in other words: I would most likely have remained one of their “useful idiots”.
Almost from the very first day in Israel I felt ill at ease. I blamed it on culture shock, not uncommon when you change your country, language and way of life. Now, however, I tend to think that it most likely was my subconscious mind sensing that things were not quite what they seemed. In fact, the warning was so strong that within four weeks of arriving I formally declined Israeli citizenship which is conferred upon every Jewish immigrant automatically unless he or she opts out within a certain time frame. It had already become clear to me that I would not stay permanently and therefore I did not want to be stuck with the label “Israeli”.
Whereas before the conversion I only rejected things German after the conversion I found myself looking down on everything that wasn’t Jewish. The irony was: I looked down upon non-Jews while Jews looked down upon me. So here I was, naively thinking of myself as a Jew while the “real” Jews considered me not a Jew but a “converted goy” – more or less like an unwelcome guest who had invited himself to the party. I quickly learnt to withhold the fact that I was a convert.
While I am by no means a scholar I do speak Hebrew and Aramaic fluently and did, from time to time, engage in religious studies in a Jerusalem yeshiva (religious academy). One of the most disturbing discoveries I made there was to find that the accusations of hate-mongering and racism routinely levelled against the Talmud are not anti-Semitic fabrications at all. The Talmud is exactly what its detractors claim it is. Personally, I am not going to mince words: it reeks of the sewer.
Talmudic studies are not, as Jews would have you believe, challenging and intellectually stimulating, quite the contrary – they are stupefying in their total focus on the minutiae of trivial and irrelevant matters. Just spare a thought for the poor boys that are, from a very early age, forced to immerse themselves in such studies. With this kind of unnatural upbringing and education is it any wonder that Jews are mentally unstable?
A detailed analysis of the Talmud is beyond the scope of this article. A good book to start, if you think you can stand the obscenities, inanities and the mind-numbing casuistry contained in the Talmud, is Elizabeth Dilling’s book The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today.
Another author I can recommend is Michael Hoffman. Check out his work “Judaism Discovered”
Let me pick just one item: racism. The Talmud is the Racist Manifesto par excellence! Racism is an integral part of Jewish life both outside and within Israel. At the top of the money-and-power pyramid are Western-educated Ashkenazim (Jews of Eastern European, i.e. Khazar origin), followed by Sephardim (Jews of Spanish-North African lineage). Below the Sephardim you will find a motley collection of other, mostly dark-skinned, ethnicities such as Ethiopian Jews and Indian Jews.
And at the bottom you will find the non-Jews. There are the Palestinians, the only people with a genuine claim on Palestine and, ironically, the only people with a genuine claim on being the lineal genetic descendants of the ancient Judeans. And then there are the non-Jewish spouses of Jews and their off-spring (if the mother is the Gentile the child is a Gentile!).
At various times in history and in various countries Jews had to wear some distinguising mark. The last time this was in Germany where they had to sew a yellow Star of David on their clothes and had the letter J (Jude = Jew) stamped in their ID papers.
That’s discrimination, of course. Yet Israel does exactly the same. The Israeli ID card records the ethnic status of a person. For instance, Jews are recorded as yehudi (Jew), non-Jews show their respective ethnic designation. Palestinians show aravi (Arab), a German Gentile will show germani and so on and so forth. This is clearly designed to set Jews apart from non-Jews. This time, however, Jews are the top dogs!
Can you imagine the outrage and fury of the Jewish thought police if any other country were to do this? But, of course, it is not discrimination at all, dummy! It’s kosher because the Jews do it! Come to think of it – it’s probably viewed as anti-Semitic to say that this document constitutes racial discrimination!
You wish to know what real discrimination is? I suggest you go and try to live in Israel as a non-Jew. You enjoy being spit on – I mean quite literally spit on?? Jerusalem is the place you want to be!
My social life soon came to a complete standstill because I couldn’t stand the boundless arrogance, chutzpah, coldness, rudeness, aggressiveness, narcissm and lack of sensitivity of the Israelis.
Life in Israel was not one of high drama but one of quiet misery. I felt as though I was suffocating. The novelty of it all was wearing off fast while at the same time there was the growing realization that some of the thoroughly unpleasant character traits of Jews in general and Israelis in particular were actually beginning to rub off on me, such as rudeness and aggressiveness – and I was even making excuses for that! When in Rome……….
I knew then that I had to remove myself both from Israel and from Judaism in order to preserve my sanity. Within less than a year of arriving in Israel I found I had turned into someone whom I would previously have called an anti-Semite!
You can love the Jews or you can hate them but it is virtually impossible to just ignore them. The German Kaiser Wilhelm II referred to them as “some kind of bad insect”. And like bad insects they keep on coming back! They have a way of imposing themselves and their “ideas” and “values” on you, directly or indirectly, with or without your consent.
Lest I be accused of hate-mongering let me make one thing clear: I do not hate either Jews or Israelis. Period. Having personally experienced the ill-effects of negative emotions such as contempt and hatred I can say that they are far more damaging to the one who harbours them than to the target.
No, I do not hate them, I pity them: they are truly pathetic in their ignorance, arrogance and self-righteousness. Regardless of where they live, the US or Germany, Australia or Israel, regardless of their individual circumstances, they are almost all of them trapped in a mental ghetto of their own creation, in a claustrophobic nightmare of self-centredness and persecution paranoia (you see, everybody is after them!)
I view the Jewish people, exactly like the Gentile nations they like to look down upon, as pawns in a game that they neither understand nor are even aware of. There is a cabal hidden within Jewry which cares for the “lesser brethren” no more than it cares for the “goyim”. If the Jews do not wake up soon to the machinations of their secular and religious leadership they will be sacrificed to the NWO like everybody else.
To this cabal Jews are, exactly like Gentiles, “useful idiots”, an army of Talmud-programmed zombies to conquer the world and make it safe for Satanism. Mind-controlled assassins, however, even though they may ultimately not be responsible for their actions, are still a danger that needs to be confronted and dealt with.
To the German people I say this: My heart-felt apologies for my unkind thoughts and arrogant conduct. I am truly sorry!
To the Jews I have this to say: I appeal to all of you who can still tell right from wrong to renounce Jewishness. Decency and Judaism are incompatible. Judaism is not salvageable!
Crimes of the Bolsheviks, by Isabella Fanfani (ed.) ***
CRIMES OF THE BOLSHEVIKS
A revised and re-edited version of A Sea of Blood: the Truth about Bolshevik Russia, a 12,000-word pamphlet originally published in Munich (1926) and authored by a Russian émigré known as “Dr Gregor”.
Pictures and captions by Lasha Darkmoon
Nine years have already passed since an indescribable crime against humanity, the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917, was systematically begun. Now in its ninth year , a government exists which calls itself a worker-and-peasant government—but not one true worker or farmer has ever sat on it. For nine years, torture has been used in the name of democracy as an official instrument of the state. And in the name of socialism millions of upright individuals have been murdered, put to death through starvation, or banished from home and hearth to every distant part of the globe.
In the name of the proletariat the Russian people has been subjugated by rank foreigners, their speech has been silenced, and their bodies sent—to the cheers of the [Jewish] Third International — into mass graves.
An old Russian expression says: “There are never more lies told than before a war and after a hunt.” And in point of fact the Great War [WW1] never had a true armistice; it never really ended. And the hunt for more human skulls — of course only Christian and Aryan skulls will do — continues in accordance with a sinister and systematic plan. And thus the great lie blooms forth, in effect a form of worship of the Father of Lies, by that international scum calling itself the Bolsheviks.
Mundus vult decipi! — the world wants to be deceived! It believes Soviet lies and fairy tales and even participates in this sick comedy, sending delegations of well-known people, leftists of course, incapable of understanding the Russian language, and sympathetic to boot with the goals of the Third International!
[The 3rd Internationale was the third great convention meeting held by ultra-radical Jews and Marxists in 1919 to coordinate Communist activities worldwide.]
Off these foreign guests go to Soviet Russia to “study” the situation. These splendid chaps have no idea what Russia was like before the Bolsheviks—and what it could have become without them in the meantime! On the other hand, the Soviet Union’s new friends show great knowledge and appreciation for our Russian caviar and vodka! The caviar is good, the vodka burns like fire going down, and in the brain-fog of democratic good will one somehow misses the rivers of blood, the dashed brain fragments, and the slithering clatter of millions of slaves’ chains.
And so internationalist democracy celebrates its rites of sacrifice. The Christian lamb is slaughtered, and Annias and Caiaphas [Jewish leaders in the Sanhedrin who condemned Jesus to death], today representing international stock market capital, are the guests of honor at the feast.
The four Jews—Marx, Engels, Lenin and Trotsky—who helped to destroy the Christian Russia of the tsars and replace it with an atheistic Communism in which 66 million Russian Christians were put to death in the gulags run by the cheka.
2. The systematic destruction of Russia
The old Russia no longer exists.
In its place we have a vast desert: its intelligentsia 90% annihilated, its middle class throttled, its working class made serfs once again — but this time serfs in state-owned factories, workers who just for using the word “strike” can be put up against the wall! As for the farmer, now he is a mere beast of burden, a camel in the Soviet-made Sahara, laboring without question for his Jewish exploiters and nearly without pay.
For a non-initiate it must be entirely incomprehensible how such a mighty empire, seemingly in one night of revolution, could be set aflame at all four corners and destroyed.
However, in one night it did not happen.
The events of March 1917 — Kerensky’s middle-class overthrow of the tsar — and of November 1917 — the Bolshevik putsch against Kerensky’s government — were only the visible result of years of patient, mole-like undermining activities by the Jewish Internationale: a work which did not begin in the criminal minds of Marx, Kautsky and Engels, but instead in an earlier alliance of Jewry with the higher grades of world Freemasonry.
These lofty “idealists” have tortured and killed, in the name of Russia’s workers and peasants — and according to their very own statistics — the following numbers of victims in the first four years of the glorious Russian Revolution: 28 bishops of the Church, 1,215 priests and 6,000 monks. Why? Just because they were bishops, priests and monks, and because they believed in God — who is of course merely a disposable middle-class superstition.
Next come 8,800 Christian doctors and their aides. Why? Because they represented non-Jewish middle-class medicine.
Now come the officers: 54,650 army and naval officers, 10,500 police officers (lieutenant-rank and above) and 48,500 lower-ranking policemen. And for what reason? Because they were military and police officers, and we all know that “militarism” is no longer permissible for any nationalistic and Aryan-conscious white people. It is only allowed to Red bandits, who call themselves proletarians, to dig the real proletariat a mass grave.
Then there are 260,000 flag-loyal soldiers of the old army, all now executed. But even this statistic is trifling. Now come the intelligentsia: teachers, professors, engineers, building contractors, writers and judges — especially judges, because these were the most dangerous for a state ruled by convicted felons.
To them let us add lawyers, district attorneys and all the college-educated occupations — to reach the number of 361,825 murdered members of our most mentally demanding professions. I will not even tarry over our annihilated class of large landowners, consisting of 12,950 persons.
And when someone asks me how the Russian intelligentsia can bear the Bolshevik yoke, I always answer that the Russian intelligentsia is either literally six feet under or in exile, and that the tiny remainder left over has suffered such a blood-letting and systematic humiliation through the communist steamroller that they have forfeited every last bit of self-esteem and personal honor.
Finally, we come to the modest numbers of workers and peasants executed by the worker-and-peasant state. They amount to only 192,350 workers and 815,000 peasants. All these figures are official statistics published by the Cheka [forerunner of the KGB] and printed in easily obtainable Bolshevik newspapers during this period when the anti-communist White Russian forces were fighting Trotsky and the Red Army, [1917-1921].
All these facts can be verified in the complete volumes of information or excerpts published in 1922 by the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Kingdom of Serbia, the only country in Europe which is fighting mercilessly against the disease of communism.
Even this enormous number of casualties is small compared to the mentally ill persons now running around free in Soviet Russia — four million eight hundred thousand of them. But this is no surprise. Even the old Russia did not have enough sanatoria and hospitals for them. Now the whole country has become a madhouse.
The murders continue and the blood flows on, albeit only Christian and Aryan blood.
When during the 1922 Famine, 30,000 human beings were dying every day, Jewish leader Trotsky made the sarcastic remark: “All the better — look at the paperwork that will save us now!”
3. Tsars assassinated by the Jews
After Nicholas I, his son Alexander II mounted the throne, a true friend of his people. In 1861 he abolished serfdom and gave the peasants land. This reform happened through the mir arrangement of village communities — an institution far closer to true and sincere communism than the capitalistic, tax-exploitative system we see in Soviet Russia today.
This same tsar, Alexander II, who in 1864 gave his people a whole new trial procedure for their court system — then the fairest and most progressive in Europe — underwent seven attempts to assassinate him, until finally, in an eighth attempt perpetrated by Goldmann, Liebermann and Zuckermann — can anyone mistake their race? — successfully carried out the wishes of London.
[Great Britain was by this time in the control of the Jewish bankers of the City of London.]
Alexander II, the great benefactor of his nation, was dynamited on March 1, 1881 — the very day that he was to bestow on his country a new, constitutional form of government.
Alexander II was gone.
Alexander III now became tsar. With respect to this monarch who preserved European peace, we Russians were all convinced that when he died in 1894, he had succumbed to a normal illness — in this case an acute kidney infection. How great was afterward our amazement when we learned — on the run, in exile, and from Jewish sources — that this tsar too had fallen victim to the criminal minds of the tribe of Judah.
The Jew Saltus exults over this fact in his book The Imperial Orgy, published in New York in 1920. In·his foam-mouthed delirium over the successful downfall of the Christian-Aryan world he explains in his book how the Jews, working with the Entente powers — England, France, the U.S. and Italy — got rid of the tsars one after the other.
He further relates that, at the same time as Russian churches were praying for the health of the tsar, he was being cursed in the synagogues.
To the bedside of the sick tsar his personal physician, Zakharin, was summoned. Zakharin, a perfectly good Russian name, and yet — a Jew. When he arrived to see the tsar in Livadiya, he had the medicine all ready for him in his vest pocket. The kind of medicine is easy to imagine: a one-way ticket into the next world.
After the trusting tsar had swallowed the medication and was rolling in pain on his bed, Zakharin bent over-him — according to Saltus — with a diabolical grin on his face.
The tsar choked out the words “Who are you?”
Zakharin’s answer: “I am a Jew!” And with enormous chutzpah, he then turned to the empress and the tsar’s ministers and said: “Not to worry, his majesty is only talking in a fever!”
Then he bent over the dying man and grinned at him again: “You are breathing your last breath—and we have won!”
This comes straight from the Jew Saltus in his book The Imperial Orgy.
4. The murder of millions of Christians by the Cheka
And then the Russian Revolution came.
Who were these friends of the common people who in the name of freedom, equality, and democracy began annihilating the Christian-Aryan population?
Undoubtedly there were among them some true idealists who really believed that they could use murder and manslaughter, robbery and theft, to make a happier world and a new paradise of equality. The well-known result, however, was a living hell consisting of hunger, deprivation, despair and an equality only in one’s right to be murdered by the Jewish-controlled Cheka [forerunner of the KGB].
The word “Cheka” is not only an acronym in Russian for “Special Commission for Fighting Counter-Revolution,” but also a Yiddish expression for animal slaughter. How fitting this expression! We Christians, who are called “goyim” or cattle, are in the Jewish view mere animals. Yahweh gave us human faces, however, so as to spare the Jews the distress of having servants who looked like animals. [Paraphrased]
The first provisional government [after the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II and just before the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution] consisted exclusively of Freemasons of Romance-language initiation, from France or Italy, and funded by English money. The criminality of this “provisional government” knew no bounds, because it did the most despicable thing a government can do. It ignored the promises, purposes and ideals for which it was put in power—and for which it had overthrown the Tsar, head of state.
The nine months of this “government” was nothing but a gestation period, and horribly pregnant Russia gave birth to the miscarriage from hell on October 27, 1917. It can rightly be said that power was lying there on the street and the Bolsheviks merely picked it up. To provide a show for the friendly democracies abroad, there had to be street battles in Russia. And so the prime minister Kerensky, a half-Jew whose real name was Kirbis, meaning “pumpkin”, deliberately sent a battalion of women and young officer cadets into the jaws of a howling and murderous mob, where they were sadistically annihilated. Meanwhile Kerensky, dressed in a sailor suit, fled St. Petersburg.
Just before that, Kerensky had signed — for publicity reasons — an arrest warrant against the “traitor Trotsky” [Bronstein]. But when General Polovtsev showed up with his Cossacks in Trotsky’s apartment to arrest him, there sitting in a plush armchair with Trotsky was Kerensky, sipping a liqueur. He took the arrest warrant from the astonished general’s hand, theatrically tore it up, and sent the general on his way — a man who lacked the courage to simply arrest both these scum — for in a revolution, the first one to pick up his stick is on top.
In any case, the Russian and foreign publics were to be treated to scenes of urban warfare and bloodshed.
Aryan blood, of course.
5. Lenin, a syphilitic psychopath
The Mensheviks, or “majority people”, wanted a peaceful socialist welfare state and limited state ownership of industries as in Sweden. The Bolsheviks, or “minority people” [i.e., mostly Jews] wanted a reign of terror and total nationalization under Lenin and Trotsky.
The Mensheviks made only one condition: that Lenin explain himself with respect to allegations of theft from the Party. When the convention began and Lenin was challenged to give an account of himself, he stood up, stuck his hands in his pockets and proclaimed that his standing was so high in the party that he owed no one any answers.
When Lenin first arrived in Russia from Germany, he was already demented from untreated or poorly treated syphilis.
With this softening of the brain — a sort of gumming of the tissues — he was now fully qualified to pour his criminal fantasies into the ears of the foaming mob.
Russia already stood in flames, and the shabby gang of brigands were encouraged by Lenin’s slogan, “Rob back what they robbed from us!”
And so the mob hurled themselves upon the meager remains of Russian society. Under the joyful croakings of Jewry, Mother Russia was submerged.
The brain disease which afflicted Lenin continued to take its course. One insane idea after another issued forth from his government. The most renowned doctors in Germany boarded airplanes in an attempt to jerry-rig this decrepit swindler statesman, but he descended further and further into mental confusion. It is said that before his death he experienced a few shafts of mental light during which he crawled on all fours on the carpet and whimpered pitifully “Forgive me, Lord, forgive!”
Truly, truly the “international proletariat” can be proud: its leader a thief, its prophet a syphilitic, its greatest man a mass murderer.
Instead of leading mankind into the bright light above the clouds, it has jammed humanity down into the sewer, and it is no accident that his mausoleum —“Lenin’s tomb” — looks today like a public lavatory.
After the February Revolution of 1917, Nicholas II abdicated his throne and took refuge with his family in a house in Yekaterinburg. The Czar, his wife, his son, his four daughters, his servants and family doctor were all killed in the same room by the Bolsheviks on the night of July 17, 1918. It has since been confirmed that Lenin ordered the clandestine killings from Moscow.
Veteran British journalist Robert Wilton explains in his cult classic, The Fall of the Romanovs, how the murder of the Tsar and his family was orchestrated entirely by Jews:
“The whole record of Bolshevism in Russia is indeliby impressed with the stamp of an alien invasion. The murder of the Tsar, deliberately planned by the Jew Sverdlov, and carried out by the Jews Goloshchekin, Syromolotov, Safarov, Voikov, and Yorovsky, is the act not of the Russan people, but of this hostile invader.” (Robert Wilton, The Fall of the Romanovs, p.148).
6. Trotsky, another killer of Christians
Lenin’s great rival was a man who nearly exceeds him in treachery, viciousness and sadistic love of executions: the Jew Laibe Bronstein, who now calls himself Leo Trotsky.
This Bronstein-Trotsky character formerly was an ultra-radical writer of gall-dripping articles for Jewish newspapers. But long before the war he was an agent of the tsarist secret police in Vienna, reporting on Russian Jews who had deserted from the Russian armed forces.
Trotsky, a full-blooded Jew, betrayed his racial brothers to the Russian government for 150 gold crowns a month [about $200]. This perhaps tells us all we need to know about him.
He moved to St. Petersburg and founded a very bourgeois and capitalist freight-moving business. Later he got into the business of lopping off heads when it became more advantageous to be a communist. The whole communist system under Soviet Judea is shot through with bizarre values. While pure communism is said to promise a community of sharing, the slogan of Russian communism seems to be: “What’s mine is mine — and what’s yours is mine, too!”
“This anti-Bolshevik propaganda poster, dated to 1919, shows Leon Trotsky (born Lev Davidovich Bronstein) as a devil. Elements of the imagery reveal anti-Semitism: a popular anti-communist tactic was to overplay the role of Jews in the Russian Bolshevik Revolution.” (From a Zionist website, attempting to minimize the role played by Jews in the Bolshevik Revolution. See here).
The Chinese soldiers, presiding here over a mound of corpses and shooting Russian Christians to death, were hired mercenaries for the Jewish Bolsheviks. They did the Jews’ dirty work for them. Their reputation for sadistic torture on behalf of their Bolshevik employers was legendary. Thus they were responsible for introducing into Europe the infamous “rat torture”, a variation of which was to appear later as the horrendous climax of Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty Four.
FAMOUS TROTSKY QUOTE (1917):
“We must turn Russia into a desert populated by white negroes upon whom we shall impose a tyranny such as the most terrible Eastern despots never dreamt of. The only difference is that this will be a left-wing tyranny, not a right-wing tyranny. It will be a red tyranny and not a white one. We mean the word ‘red’ literally, because we shall shed such floods of blood as will make all the human losses suffered in the capitalist wars pale by comparison. The biggest bankers across the ocean will work in the closest possible contact with us. If we win the revolution, we shall establish the power of Zionism upon the wreckage of the revolution’s funeral, and we shall became a power before which the whole world will sink to its knees. We shall show what real power is. By means of terror and bloodbaths, we shall reduce the Russian intelligentsia to a state of complete stupefaction and idiocy and to an animal existence.”
— From the ‘Memoirs of Aron Simanovich’, quoted in The Nature of Zionism by Vladimir Stepin, Moscow, 1993, and translated from Russian into English by Clive Lindhurst.
7. Fiendish tortures devised by the Jewish Cheka
For all time these names — the Jew Trotsky, the Pole Dzherzhinski, the Russian Moros, the Latvians Lazis and Peter — all these being the original creators of the infamous Cheka — will stand out in world history as mass murderers.
Even the bloodiest persecutions of Christians under Tiberius or Nero and the most grotesque tortures of the Spanish Inquisition under Torquemada — a converted Jew — pale by comparison with the indescribably gruesome deeds committed by the Jewish and Latvian run Cheka.
A whole shelf of books with both written and photographic documentation has been published on this theme.
I need mention only The Blood Intoxication of the Bolsheviks by Nilostonsky, The Battle Against Bolshevism by Avalov, The Plague over Russia by Albert Rosenberg, Soviet Russia by Katharina Haug-Houg, and The Cheka by Georg Popov.
[Here now are some of the gruesome tortures devised by the Jewish Cheka for its mostly Russian Christian victims.]
When the Reds occupied a city, they took hostages — such as people wearing ties or workers in their Sunday best. They stripped them naked and then bound onto the stomach of the murder victim an empty flower pot into which a ravenous, starving rat was placed. Through the small water hole in the base of the flower pot a red-hot iron rod was pushed to torment the rat and make him wild, causing him to try to burrow himself away from the rod — and deep into the abdomen of the horrified human victim.
They lined up other victims in military formation, then ordered the first row to place one hand upon a wooden table. A nail was driven through the hand into the wood. Then they cut a full circle around the wrist skin, drenched the hand in boiling water and pulled the hand and finger skin right off. This they called “making gloves”.
Interestingly, each torture chamber had its own special torture lady, always a Jewess or Latvian female, usually with a nickname such as “Dora, the glove maker” or “Rosa, the glove lady.”
It comes as no surprise to us to learn that the chief justice of a criminal court in Moscow is also a Jewess, Anya Glusmann, who is said to love pronouncing death sentences above all else, and, according to a fawning newspaper article about her, she loves flowers and perfume after a “hard day’s work.”
There is more: such as placing a man’s head on an anvil, then slowly exploding it using a huge iron hammer with ever-increasing weights.
Those fated to suffer the same death the following day were ordered to pick up the brain and bone pieces, the nerve tissue and blood which they witnessed flying around the room. When ordered to their work they were told: “You are digging your own grave. You must be happy that tomorrow your own kind will be picking up the pieces of your cadavers.”
As for men of the cloth, they would bring priests into a church, marry them with a sow or mare in a sarcastic ceremony and then nail them to the cross over the altar.
The bishop of Voronesh was plunged live into a giant kettle of boiling water and his monks were forced at revolver point to take spoonfuls of this “soup”.
High-ranking clergymen had their eyes gouged out, the tongue severed, and the ears sliced off.
Then they were buried alive.
Or their abdomen was opened with a knife and the first section of their intestines was nailed to a telephone pole. They were then forced to run around the pole as their entrails unwound until death came.
Officers of the Russian navy were steamed to death in their own engine rooms.
They were chained to cement blocks and hurled off the piers so that their tethered corpses, decomposing and rising under the waves, formed hideous, tossing forests of the dead.
General Viren of Kronstadt had both his arms hacked off and was then paraded around the downtown area until it became boring, whereupon he was shot.
Human beings had burning cigars pushed into their open eyes until they were blind, their entire body being roasted on spits.
Heads were squeezed slowly to the bursting point with special brain vises.
The German Army discovered a chamber full of these and similar devices, including a testicle-cracker, in an underground chamber in Ukraine in 1941. Adapted dentist drills were used to drill deep into the brain.
They sawed off the top of people’s skulls and forced others to eat their brains, whereupon the eaters then came under the saw and in turn had their own brains eaten. [Paraphrased]
Entire families were arrested and children tortured before the eyes of their bound parents, or the wife was tormented before the eyes of her husband or the reverse.
The Bolsheviks drove nails into empty wooden barrels, then jammed human beings inside, rolling the barrels around merrily.
Mass graves of people buried alive were found by the White Army. Victims of live burial usually have dirt in their mouth and nostrils from trying to breathe. The writhing bodies of these people were found in the most bizarre contortions.
And all this in the sweet name of freedom and democracy!
* * *
(Further corroboration for these horrendous crimes will be found in this recent article by Dr Lasha Darkmoon. The most detailed and impassioned account, however, remains Eustace Mullin’s classic The Secret Holocaust. The real holocaust was a Christian Holocaust by Jews of sixty-six million, mostly Christians.)
Pass it on . . . please send this article to someone you know